The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: lastparker on April 03, 2014, 02:43:35 PM

Title: Lioness hard at work coming up with a whole new basis for litigation
Post by: lastparker on April 03, 2014, 02:43:35 PM
Any moles interested in being her guinea pig?

Quote
La Lioness Priyanka (47,021 posts)

Dear Feminists who are part of a same-sex couple. Could you please help me?


In an effort to conduct research on same-sex couples, specifically the problems they may experience in regards to workplace policies and public policies, we are conducting a research study targeting same-sex couples. Your input can help us understand the unique problems same-sex couples may face. We estimate that it will take you approximately 20 minutes to complete the survey.

In order to qualify for this survey
• You must be part of a same-sex relationship for at least 1 year
• Be above the age of 18
• Living in the U.S.A.

Please let me know if you are interested in this survey, if so, I will message you with all relevant information,

LLP

PS: If you have friends who might be interested, please let me know

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113910890
Title: Re: Lioness hard at work coming up with a whole new basis for litigation
Post by: jukin on April 03, 2014, 03:22:38 PM
When I was in business I just hired the person that appeared to be the best person for the job. I hired homos and straights, men and women, black or brown or white, never giving a thought to it. However if I were hiring people today, I would give women homos, and minorities an extra review due to the fact they could so easily sue over the most trivial event.

This shit ain't helping any special victim class in small business...well any successful non-governmental service company.
Title: Re: Lioness hard at work coming up with a whole new basis for litigation
Post by: franksolich on April 03, 2014, 03:43:43 PM
This shit ain't helping any special victim class in small business...well any successful non-governmental service company.

Tell me about it, sir.

Ever since the handicapped became a "protected class," we've been driven closer and closer to the reservation, and many have already been swallowed up.

<<<not swallowed up yet.

It happens because before deciding which job candidates to interview, employers now try to speculate beforehand if that person's "special," and hence poses a threat for litigation.  If so, he's not interviewed.

Now ask me why I, a deaf person, so strenuously opposed ADA.
Title: Re: Lioness hard at work coming up with a whole new basis for litigation
Post by: obumazombie on April 03, 2014, 03:55:00 PM
Tell me about it, sir.

Ever since the handicapped became a "protected class," we've been driven closer and closer to the reservation, and many have already been swallowed up.

<<<not swallowed up yet.

It happens because before deciding which job candidates to interview, employers now try to speculate beforehand if that person's "special," and hence poses a threat for litigation.  If so, he's not interviewed.

Now ask me why I, a deaf person, so strenuously opposed ADA.

Because you have a wonderful mind and are able to see what the law of unintended consequences can bring about. Usually when the libs try to "help" they make everything ever worse.
Title: Re: Lioness hard at work coming up with a whole new basis for litigation
Post by: franksolich on April 03, 2014, 04:20:22 PM
Usually when the libs try to "help" they make everything ever worse.

I assure you, sir, they most assuredly ****ed us up.

As Calvin Coolidge or somebody else said, "If you want to see a protected class, look at the American Indian."

Something like that, he said.