The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on March 27, 2014, 10:21:35 AM
-
Star Member WilliamPitt (56,531 posts)
The used car salesman strikes again
"Moreover, Russia has pointed to America’s decision to go into Iraq as an example of Western hypocrisy. Now, it is true that the Iraq War was a subject of vigorous debate not just around the world, but in the United States as well. I participated in that debate and I opposed our military intervention there. But even in Iraq, America sought to work within the international system. We did not claim or annex Iraq’s territory. We did not grab its resources for our own gain. Instead, we ended our war and left Iraq to its people and a fully sovereign Iraqi state that could make decisions about its own future."
- Obama, in Brussells, yesterday
An amazing amount of bullshit in one paragraph. We ran roughshod over the international community to get that war going. If an invasion and ten-year occupation isn't annexation, then nothing is. We totally, totally grabbed their resources, because the oil was supposed to "pay for the war," as I recall...and there were gas lines in Iraq for years after the invasion, because we were sitting on their oil like it was our own private piggy bank. And as for the state we left Iraq in, thousands upon thousands of people have been killed in the sectarian strife we left behind. They aren't making decisions about their future. They're running for their damned lives.
The used car salesman is trying to sell the lemon that was the Iraq war in order to avoid sounding like a hypocrite about Russia.
Utterly nauseating.
Will Pitt, you racist scumbag! Disagreeing with your Master!!!! (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024734511)
-
(http://dealbreaker.com/uploads/2012/03/ihadguestswhogunsnroses.jpg)
-
WilliamPitt
The used car salesman strikes again
"Moreover, Russia has pointed to America’s decision to go into Iraq as an example of Western hypocrisy. Now, it is true that the Iraq War was a subject of vigorous debate not just around the world, but in the United States as well. I participated in that debate and I opposed our military intervention there. But even in Iraq, America sought to work within the international system. We did not claim or annex Iraq’s territory. We did not grab its resources for our own gain. Instead, we ended our war and left Iraq to its people and a fully sovereign Iraqi state that could make decisions about its own future."
- Obama, in Brussells, yesterday
An amazing amount of bullshit in one paragraph. We ran roughshod over the international community to get that war going. If an invasion and ten-year occupation isn't annexation, then nothing is. We totally, totally grabbed their resources, because the oil was supposed to "pay for the war," as I recall...and there were gas lines in Iraq for years after the invasion, because we were sitting on their oil like it was our own private piggy bank. And as for the state we left Iraq in, thousands upon thousands of people have been killed in the sectarian strife we left behind. They aren't making decisions about their future. They're running for their damned lives.
The used car salesman is trying to sell the lemon that was the Iraq war in order to avoid sounding like a hypocrite about Russia.
Utterly nauseating.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024734511
The Magistrate
1. The 'You Did It Too' Line Taken Against Criticism Of Putin In Crimea, Sir
Pretty much required some such statement from the President. I agree what he said is a stretch and a half, but it does not bother me much. I can understand why it was done.
IOW Dear Leader can say whatever he wants and no consequences from the cult followers. They understand.
.
-
I think Bill's asking for trouble.
-
MineralMan (62,542 posts)
17. Doubling down on calling the President ugly names
isn't my idea of DU discussion, Will.
What's next?
Looks like calling PrezBO names isn't going over to well at the collective. Pittstains days at the hive may be numbered. :rotf:
-
Star Member Skinner (59,179 posts)
34. Disappointed to see you doubling down on calling the president names.
No, I'm not telling you to stop. I just figured you might want to know that some people don't appreciate seeing that here. Just in case you care about that sort of thing.
What a HOMO. Guess Skinner knows where is bread is buttered.
-
I always knew Skin's was a mindnumbed robot, but not often you get to see him come out and admit it.
.
-
What a HOMO. Guess Skinner knows where is bread is buttered.
Pitt has ties to pedophiles...perhaps skins is worried about loose lips.
-
loose lips
You just got stevenumbers's attention.
-
What a bunch of racists.
-
gNads calls the hive dwellers "the swarm" :lmao:
nadinbrzezinski (131,831 posts)
18. This us not for you, but the swarm
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.â€
Teddy Roosevelt said this during World War 1. It truly still applies today.
Oh and they will not be happy until either you shut up, or go away.
Star Member rudolph the red (284 posts)
28. Loudmouth drunken assholes often have the best advice.
:o
stg81 (288 posts)
52. Trashing President Obama is against the DU rules - a banning offense.
-
And as for the state we left Iraq in, thousands upon thousands of people have been killed in the sectarian strife we left behind.
And the violence in Iraq has gotten extremely worse after Obama worked his magic there. I think Afghanistan is going to suffer the same fate after Obama finishes up there, too.
-
Pitt's tirade is so bizarre it's becoming harder to distinguish the low-post trolls from the moles :rofl:
-
stg81 (288 posts)
52. Trashing President Obama is against the DU rules - a banning offense.
Only for the serf class of DUmmieland. Exalted members as the Pittstain are exempted from such petty rules. :rotf:
-
Only for the serf class of DUmmieland. Exalted members as the Pittstain are exempted from such petty rules. :rotf:
So within the Democrat party.... Willy would be a super delegate then? All are equal, but some are more equal than others.
-
Only for the serf class of DUmmieland. Exalted members as the Pittstain are exempted from such petty rules. :rotf:
And Pittstain is aware of the 'exalted member exemption', inasmuch as he was welcomed back into the hive following his tirade/threats made to Bobolink quite some time ago.
I think Pittstain is teflon coated insofar as banning is concerned. He'll bluster, they'll threaten/warn/chastise, he'll back off and apologize and all will be fine until the next breakdown.
-
Somebody ring the bell. I just found the winning comment. :lmao: :rotf:
Response to Skinner (Reply #34)
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 11:57 AM
nadinbrzezinski (131,837 posts)
62. I am shocked you forgot to capitalize the word President <------ :lmao:
Or follow the archaic (only the NYT uses it anymore,) Mr. President.
I will quote Former President Teddy Roosevelt to you too. Skimmer can hardly wait.
<snip for brevity>
gNads is now the grammar/spelling expert. :mental: :loser:
-
62. I am shocked you forgot to capitalize the word President
Or follow the archaic (only the NYT uses it anymore,) Mr. President.
The crazy bald dwarf is wrong as usual, despite being a pro journo and photog.
The New York Times stylebook refers to the jug-eared muslim as President Obama or Mr. Obama.
It uses the honorific "Mr." when referring to any man in a story, even criminals which is very unusual in contemporary journalism.
The term "Mr. President" is universally used when addressing any American President in person.
Every journalist, White House employee, congressman, and courteous citizen addresses the President that way in person.
Its use is certainly not confined to the New York Times. I guess the nutcase has never been to a White House presser.
-
Pitt has ties to pedophiles...
Yup. He sees one in the mirror every morning, poor bastard. :fuelfire:
-
gNads calls the hive dwellers "the swarm" :lmao:
:o
And Pitt should listen to the wisdom coming from ol' Ben Franklin Nads.
-
Will Pitt, you racist scumbag! Disagreeing with your Master!!!! (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024734511)
So, I take it that I can bank it that he didn't park it.
Is that the gist of it?
(http://cdn.smosh.com/sites/default/files/ftpuploads/bloguploads/drunk-santas-bar.jpg)
Merry Fitzmas
-
Yup. He sees one in the mirror every morning, poor bastard. :fuelfire:
Willy's little willy? :???:
:bolt:
-
Willy's little willy? :???:
:bolt:
Willy's little willy was the reason he had to bring his budding career as a substitute teacher to a screeching halt. :thatsright:
-
Found another good one. :lmao:
Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 02:50 PM
Star Member ecstatic (19,156 posts)
403. #plonk. Good riddance. nt
I can't believe that one popped up. :rotf:
-
Many people are asking why nadin's writing is so classy, while Pitt is such a racist for criticizing the jug-eared Kenyan.
So she explains to set their minds at ease:
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 02:36 PM
nadinbrzezinski (131,883 posts)
384. So calling the current President "a used car salesman" is not ok
but calling the previous one "baboon" is a-ok?
Will Pitt is an editorial writer. I can guarantee you that in my writing no names will appear, but that is because I write straight reporting.
nadin is a straight journo. And a photog. And she's not a partisan. And she's dumber than a stump.
Pitt's last attempt at being a journo was when he stole Leopold's story about the Rove indictment.
-
Will Pitt is an editorial writer. I can guarantee you that in my writing no names will appear, but that is because I write straight reporting.
That sounds more like yellow tabloid journalism and gossip mongering than true reporting.
"An unnamed cit councilman from an unnamed city is sleeping with an unnamed person."
-
You just got stevenumbers's attention.
Or Ben Burch.
Cindie
-
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 02:36 PM
nadinbrzezinski (131,883 posts)
384. So calling the current President "a used car salesman" is not ok
but calling the previous one "baboon" is a-ok?
Will Pitt is an editorial writer. I can guarantee you that in my writing no names will appear, but that is because I write straight reporting.
Straight reporting?
That should being out the Lavender Mafia with the pitchforks and torches.
-
I was curious about what the DUmpster guests were viewing.
If it's any thread related to Pittstains drunken rage, they're looking at it. :rotf: