The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Skul on March 21, 2014, 07:21:54 AM

Title: The site that shall not be named
Post by: Skul on March 21, 2014, 07:21:54 AM
Just ran into this, and it cracked me up.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024701279
A seemingly innocent question, right?
Quote
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:26 AM
reformist2 (6,143 posts)

So DU selectively censors sources of information? Wow. A list of unacceptable sources might be good.
   
Apparently anything this Paul Joseph Watson guy says is unacceptable, apparently because he's an Infowars guy (never mind that I didn't even link to Infowars.)

Just so I know, does this also mean DU'ers are not to talk about anything said on Michael Savage's show as well? 
Here we go.  :rotf:
Quote
Response to reformist2 (Original post)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:39 AM

Whisp (22,576 posts)

2. It's been this way as long as I remember.
Some objectionable sites like Freeperville are okay to link to because they provide laughs and tales of horror and moronicness for entertainment value. But the other conservative one is Not okay to link to, for some reason. Really??? :whistling:

It's kind of a park by feel thing - you'll know it when you hit it I guess but I don't think there will ever be an official list.

I have not a clue who that guy is you are talking about but infowars is a definite no no.
A wee bit of derpage.
Quote
Response to Whisp (Reply #2)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:53 AM

ChazII (3,557 posts)

9. What is the other conservative site?

Sorry for being ignorant but I really don't know.  Riiiiiight
Quote
Response to Whisp (Reply #2)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:14 AM

Star Member JHB (19,437 posts)

15. hazarding a guess...

Over half their total postings are about DU (they conveniently put the forum post totals on their homepage), and it's a repeated source of trolls. That's MOLES, you DUmbass.

The place's main reason for existing is as a clubhouse for a gaggle of conservative cranks to obsessively giggle over what is said here. Links there would just encourage more trolling, and there's enough already.
I'm obsessively giggling right now.  :rotf: :hyper: :hyper: :lmao:  :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: franksolich on March 21, 2014, 07:23:51 AM
Hmmmm.

They must be talking about www.conservativeunderground.com

It has that "Best/Worst of DU" forum, and it's pretty good.

Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: USA4ME on March 21, 2014, 07:37:01 AM
Quote from:
Whisp

I have not a clue who that guy is you are talking about but infowars is a definite no no.

Infowars was a definite yes yes during the Bush43 years when they were in agreement with Alex Jones and all his kooky nonsense about the evils of the BFEE. But since Bush43 left office, the primitives have changed their tune about infowars. Come to think of it, they've done the same thing with ditch witch Cindy Sheehen and several others.

I wonder what's different now?

.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: Carl on March 21, 2014, 07:37:29 AM
Quote
Response to Whisp (Reply #2)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:14 AM

Star Member JHB (19,437 posts)

15. hazarding a guess...

Over half their total postings are about DU (they conveniently put the forum post totals on their homepage), and it's a repeated source of trolls. That's MOLES, you DUmbass.

The place's main reason for existing is as a clubhouse for a gaggle of conservative cranks to obsessively giggle over what is said here. Links there would just encourage more trolling, and there's enough already.

If you don`t say stupid,hateful things DUmbass then no one would laugh.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: dane on March 21, 2014, 08:00:51 AM
Quote
Response to Whisp (Reply #2)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:14 AM

Star Member JHB (19,437 posts)

15. hazarding a guess...

Over half their total postings are about DU (they conveniently put the forum post totals on their homepage), and it's a repeated source of trolls. That's MOLES, you DUmbass.

The place's main reason for existing is as a clubhouse for a gaggle of conservative cranks to obsessively giggle over what is said here. Links there would just encourage more trolling, and there's enough already.
If they would actually read what the other DUmmies post, they too would giggle.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 21, 2014, 10:19:02 AM
If they would actually read what the other DUmmies post, they too would giggle.
No they wouldn't. What we giggle at is some serious $hit to them.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: Skul on March 21, 2014, 10:26:13 AM
Just out of curiosity. Seven guests are viewing this topic.  :lmao:
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: BannedFromDU on March 21, 2014, 10:34:26 AM
Quote
Response to Whisp (Reply #2)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:14 AM

Star Member JHB (19,437 posts)

15. hazarding a guess...

Over half their total postings are about DU (they conveniently put the forum post totals on their homepage), and it's a repeated source of trolls.

The place's main reason for existing is as a clubhouse for a gaggle of conservative cranks to obsessively giggle over what is said here. Links there would just encourage more trolling, and there's enough already.


     So? Well over half of YOUR posts are from and about the following:



     Are you guys still under the impression that ANYTHING you do or say has ANY impact on ANYTHING? DU is your LIFE. This is a TIME KILLER for most of us.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: Cats on March 21, 2014, 11:51:58 AM
Quote
Whisp (22,593 posts)
16. JHB in the post down has it right.

I'll type it out for you, but in white type :

conservative cave
a real bad batch of oozing stench there.

I think their love of BO is affecting their minds... :yahoo:
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: BannedFromDU on March 21, 2014, 11:55:07 AM
Quote
Whisp (22,593 posts)
16. JHB in the post down has it right.

I'll type it out for you, but in white type :

conservative cave
a real bad batch of oozing stench there.


     What a bunch of pathetic dick-tucking nancy boys you DUmmies are.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: Skul on March 21, 2014, 12:11:22 PM
When someone goes to a circus, that someone is expected to laugh and giggle at the clowns.  :hyper:

Just a short visit over there, is an illustration.
Fizzgigs stinky feet.
How to eat peanut butter.
Pittstains drunken rant.
Cat fight over whether Pittstain is drunk or stupid.  (the answer is "yes", DUmpmonkeys)
Dog whistle racists.
Dead DUmmies
Ku Klux Klams
on.
and on.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: Rebel on March 21, 2014, 12:22:07 PM
Difference between CC and DU is this, lurking DUmbasses; we come here for entertainment. You idiots go to DU to have a purpose in your life. Not one of us log off of CC with a feeling that we accomplished some goal that completes our life. gNads is THE perfect example of that, but every one of you fruitbats do it to some extent. We get that from our jobs, our families, and our daily lives. We don't live for the sole purpose of acting high and mighty and to constantly display what our interwebs IQ is......or what you fools think it is.

To sum up the difference between the two sites, and how we use/view them? Entertainment vs. meaning for life. You fools are the latter.
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on March 21, 2014, 01:41:03 PM
Quote
aikoaiko (18,144 posts)
18. Locking.

Creating an OP to complain about a host decision is not permitted in GD. You might have more success posting it in Ask the Administrators if you think you've not been served well.

 :jerkit:
Title: Re: The site that shall not be named
Post by: BannedFromDU on March 21, 2014, 01:45:22 PM
:jerkit:

      Oh, yeah, DUmmies, there's that other thing: our mods don't tell you what you can and can't read.