The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dane on March 09, 2014, 06:45:46 AM

Title: Question re DUmmy lack of consistency. There is no DU OP.
Post by: dane on March 09, 2014, 06:45:46 AM
There have been many DU OPs the last few weeks about the possibility/probability of Sen Sanders seeking the Democrat nomination, and even winning the WH.

Many of the DUmmies don't seem to hate this idea.

My question is this:  Sanders was born in 1941, McCain 1936.  That would make Sanders *about* the same age at swearing in that McCain would have been.

The DUmmies were all over McCain's age, saying he was too old.  Why not the same objection for Sanders?  Can they not see this inconsistency?

edited to fix the subject line
Title: Re: Question re DUmmy lick of consistency. There is no DU OP.
Post by: franksolich on March 09, 2014, 06:52:46 AM
Can they not see this inconsistency?

No, they can't.

Mules and donkeys and asses are more reasonable than primitives.
Title: Re: Question re DUmmy lick of consistency. There is no DU OP.
Post by: BlueStateSaint on March 09, 2014, 07:39:53 AM
No, they can't.

Mules and donkeys and asses are more reasonable than primitives.

Too true.  I'd like to add that ideology trumps all for the primitives.
Title: Re: Question re DUmmy lack of consistency. There is no DU OP.
Post by: movie buff on March 09, 2014, 08:30:47 AM
Of course not. They never realize how hypocritical they are.
Title: Re: Question re DUmmy lack of consistency. There is no DU OP.
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 09, 2014, 08:55:37 AM
Of course not. They never realize how hypocritical they are.

It's a woman's prerogative to change her mind......and all democrats have PMS....ergo, can change their minds as the situation requires.
Title: Re: Question re DUmmy lick of consistency. There is no DU OP.
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 09, 2014, 02:14:29 PM
Too true.  I'd like to add that ideology trumps all for the primitives.

And among what politically-involved group is that not true?

I'd vote for a ham sandwich if it would prevent a democrat from appointing Supreme Court justices and regulatory agency heads.
Title: Re: Question re DUmmy lack of consistency. There is no DU OP.
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on March 09, 2014, 02:17:59 PM
Consistency as you use the word here, and the self realization of it and its importance, only materializes in individuals to which principle is of high importance, because principle is the well from which consistency springs.

Without principle, the only thing an individual is consistently capable of being, is wrong.

In spending ten plus years among the primitives, nothing (and I do mean nothing ) becomes more obvious, than the fact that they as a group, are the most unprincipled bunch that ever existed. It couldn't be more so if their admin made it a written requirement for membership.



CMD