The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dane on February 28, 2014, 06:21:33 AM

Title: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: dane on February 28, 2014, 06:21:33 AM
Quote
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024570165

The Straight Story (46,420 posts)

Woman arrested for using 911 to hit on officer

 PUNTA GORDA, FL -

A Punta Gorda woman was arrested Friday night for misuse of 911, after asking dispatchers to send an officer she found attractive back to her home for some 'extra duty.'
 
Police say the initial 911 call happened just after 6 p.m., when Maria Montenez-Colon complained that she wanted her Corvette back.
 
When the officer arrived at the Almar Drive home, he said Montenez-Colon was very drunk.
 
The 58-year-old immediately told the officer he was sexy and asked if he was married, according to the incident report. Then she started over-sharing.

This is a straight forward story, filled with opportunities for laughter.  But, what we find is :jugs:, she of everything having to do with guns, strident foe of objectification, and generally possessor of a bad mood, saying
Quote
BainsBane (23,570 posts)

9. Personally, I'd gave gone for a fireman.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Big Dog on February 28, 2014, 06:41:09 AM
So, Alex the Feminista would make a drunken 911 call, and ask for a fireman to haul out his hose and douse the burning in her bush.

I have no doubt she would howl to the heavens if one of the male DUmmies wrote something similar about a French maid or pro football cheerleader.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 28, 2014, 07:18:18 AM
So, Alex the Feminista would make a drunken 911 call, and ask for a fireman to haul out his hose and douse the burning in her bush.

I have no doubt she would howl to the heavens if one of the male DUmmies wrote something similar about a French maid or pro football cheerleader.

Dead-effin'-on.  H5.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Carl on February 28, 2014, 08:23:29 AM
Quote
BainsBane (23,570 posts)

9. Personally, I'd gave gone for a fireman.

I bet it would take more than a fire hose to douche her out. :puke:
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: vesta111 on February 28, 2014, 12:38:32 PM
I bet it would take more than a fire hose to douche her out. :puke:

Europe and Asia have for years used the shaken  up bottle of coke to do that. 

Somewhere down the line in history when Coke was trying to get their product sold to foreign company's some crafty and wise PR men spread the rumor that coke would kill the clap and syphilis germs in the Working Woman.   

After WW2  a rumor was spread that in Central and South America Coke had real Cocaine in it.  My Mother believes this to this day, we lived in Panama for a few years in the 1950 and she told me the military there stopped drinking booze and only drank Coke or Rum and Coke.

Those PR men were brilliant they did their jobs well.

Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: dane on February 28, 2014, 02:53:44 PM
Europe and Asia have for years used the shaken  up bottle of coke to do that. 

Somewhere down the line in history when Coke was trying to get their product sold to foreign company's some crafty and wise PR men spread the rumor that coke would kill the clap and syphilis germs in the Working Woman.   

After WW2  a rumor was spread that in Central and South America Coke had real Cocaine in it.  My Mother believes this to this day, we lived in Panama for a few years in the 1950 and she told me the military there stopped drinking booze and only drank Coke or Rum and Coke.

Those PR men were brilliant they did their jobs well.


There is some basis for this 'rumor', hence the "coca" in the name "Coca Cola".  A simple nadin search of *cocaine in coca cola* will give numerous sites to read, where you will find that originally there was some cocaine in the product partially made with coca leaves as an ingredient.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Bad Dog on February 28, 2014, 03:01:17 PM
This is a straight forward story, filled with opportunities for laughter.  But, what we find is :jugs:, she of everything having to do with guns, strident foe of objectification, and generally possessor of a bad mood, saying

There she goes, thinking with her snatch again.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: BadCat on February 28, 2014, 04:40:29 PM
There she goes, thinking with her snatch again.

Oh man. Not before dinner. (or after for that matter)
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Delmar on February 28, 2014, 05:02:32 PM
Quote
Response to The Straight Story (Original post)Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:42 AM
Star Member BainsBane (23,616 posts)
9. Personally, I'd have gone for a fireman.

Last edited Fri Feb 28, 2014, 05:36 PM - Edit history (1)

(For some unfathomable reason, a few folks have deiced this post was meant seriously.

I thought that maybe she had left her computer unlocked and unattended and a spiteful colleague had pulled a prank on her by posting this but I see that she edited to say it was just a joke.  I'd bet that the folks she's referring to are CC.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: dane on February 28, 2014, 05:25:57 PM
Odd, even though they proclaim themselves to be smarter than most/all others, some of us can spell correctly.  Others of us have the good sense to use spell check when we use words we obviously don't know.
Quote
For some unfathomable reason, a few folks have deiced this post was meant seriously.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 28, 2014, 06:00:31 PM
Odd, even though they proclaim themselves to be smarter than most/all others, some of us can spell correctly.  Others of us have the good sense to use spell check when we use words we obviously don't know.

What deicing compound was used?  Ethylene glycol? :???:
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: diesel driver on February 28, 2014, 06:46:35 PM
What deicing compound was used?  Ethylene glycol? :???:
I was going to post something about deicer and frigidity, but I would have been BS'd from here to Hell and back for it, so I'm not gonna.   :tongue:
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: obumazombie on February 28, 2014, 07:58:02 PM
Objectification is seems is a two way street. But it only gets approval in one direction.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: BadCat on March 01, 2014, 07:05:31 AM
I was going to post something about deicer and frigidity, but I would have been BS'd from here to Hell and back for it, so I'm not gonna.   :tongue:


Oh, I don't think Alex is frigid, in fact, she's probably a penis FREAK.  She just lashes out at men because she can't get any dick.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Big Dog on March 01, 2014, 07:42:33 AM
Oh, I don't think Alex is frigid, in fact, she's probably a penis FREAK. 

One of the  reasons I'm partial to redheads ...

Quote
She just lashes out at men because she can't get any dick.

But not every redhead. Moonbats need not apply.



Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: wasp69 on March 01, 2014, 10:08:00 AM
Quote
Response to The Straight Story (Original post)Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:42 AM
Star Member BainsBane (23,616 posts)
9. Personally, I'd have gone for a fireman.

Last edited Fri Feb 28, 2014, 05:36 PM - Edit history (1)

(For some unfathomable reason, a few folks have deiced this post was meant seriously.)

One of the hardest things to do is to be able to live up to one's own standards and, in this case, it seems PhDDs failed miserably.

Does anyone here think that this DUmmie harridan would have allowed a life support system for a penis to get away with "just kidding"?
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: dane on March 02, 2014, 01:17:01 PM
Just so I'll be perfectly clear, :jugs: has two subjects about which her panties are always wadded; objectification and guns.

Now, in this post, it appears that :jugs: has attempted to make light of objectification, and then expressed surprise that anyone would take it seriously.  Why, based on her past history of stridency on this subject, would she even attempt a joke, if that what it really was.

Unless it is a case of 'do as I say, not as I do.'

Quote
Response to The Straight Story (Original post)Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:42 AM
Star Member BainsBane (23,616 posts)
9. Personally, I'd have gone for a fireman.

Last edited Fri Feb 28, 2014, 05:36 PM - Edit history (1)

(For some unfathomable reason, a few folks have deiced this post was meant seriously.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Big Dog on March 02, 2014, 01:40:33 PM
Just so I'll be perfectly clear, :jugs: has two subjects about which her panties are always wadded; objectification and guns.

Now, in this post, it appears that :jugs: has attempted to make light of objectification, and then expressed surprise that anyone would take it seriously.  Why, based on her past history of stridency on this subject, would she even attempt a joke, if that what it really was.

Unless it is a case of 'do as I say, not as I do.'

The time stamps tell all.

Quote
Response to The Straight Story (Original post)Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:42 AM
Star Member BainsBane (23,616 posts)
9. Personally, I'd have gone for a fireman.

Posted at 1:42 AM: Alex is drunk, lonely, and horny. The batteries in her "little fireman" may have died.

Quote
Last edited Fri Feb 28, 2014, 05:36 PM - Edit history (1)

(For some unfathomable reason, a few folks have deiced this post was meant seriously.

Edited at 5:36 PM: Alex has been hoisted by her own petard, lacks the courage to admit her hypocrisy, and tries to play it off as a joke. No one believes her.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: diesel driver on March 02, 2014, 06:46:50 PM
The time stamps tell all.

Posted at 1:42 AM: Alex is drunk, lonely, and horny. The batteries in her "little fireman" may have died.

Edited at 5:36 PM: Alex has been hoisted by her own petard, lacks the courage to admit her hypocrisy, and tries to play it off as a joke. No one believes her.

As far as Alex is concerned, any petard is better than no petard.   :rotf:
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Skul on March 02, 2014, 07:07:04 PM
Yo, :jugs:  :yahoo: how they hangin' sweetcheeks?
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 02, 2014, 10:47:14 PM
Quote
a few folks have deiced this post was meant seriously.

I have no idea what that means.

Sounds like nadin, or maybe a Vesta clone.
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: obumazombie on March 02, 2014, 11:13:42 PM
I have no idea what that means.

Sounds like nadin, or maybe a Vesta clone.
Deduced perhaps ? It's all tossed into the "big" word salad.

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caBNCUmcLGA[/youtube]




It's not a regular salad
Title: Re: :juggs: objectifies
Post by: Purple Sage on March 03, 2014, 12:10:15 AM
I have no idea what that means.

Sounds like nadin, or maybe a Vesta clone.

She lives where there's so much ice, that I thought it must be a word... or something.  To de-ice is to deduce?