nadinbrzezinski (129,857 posts) Wed Feb 19, 2014, 02:28 PM
13. There we are seeing a possible split
Between the army and the police, these are echoes of both the 1905 uprising and the Russian Revolution. (Ukraine was part of the Empire and it's bread basket)
In 1905 the Navy sided with the rebels. Why the Navy was never trusted by the Soviets. In 1917 the army broke for the people while the police was still breaking skulls. Army units formed the first Soviets, (people's councils). As the civil war broke the army did as well. It was between the white forces under Alexandr Kerensky and the Red Forces.
Piece of trivia US Forces landed in Sebastopol in support of White Forces. So yes, we technically invaded mother Russia. Oh and Kerensky died penniless in NYC in the 1920
.....based on a Russian History course taken in graduate school.....
Still want to know about that purse she carry's so close to her belt.That's where she keeps the submariners balls. :rimshot:
Every picture I see of her had her hand bag tucked under her arm or in her lap. Like she was protecting an infant.
Question, does she have a carry permit and is afraid some of her lib friends will find out ?
Why this shielding action of a woman's purse unless she carry's ?
nadinbrzezinski (129,857 posts) Wed Feb 19, 2014, 02:28 PM
13. There we are seeing a possible split
Between the army and the police, these are echoes of both the 1905 uprising and the Russian Revolution. (Ukraine was part of the Empire and it's bread basket)
In 1905 the Navy sided with the rebels. Why the Navy was never trusted by the Soviets. In 1917 the army broke for the people while the police was still breaking skulls. Army units formed the first Soviets, (people's councils). As the civil war broke the army did as well. It was between the white forces under Alexandr Kerensky and the Red Forces.
And then all was right with the Bolshevik war!!!!!
Well, until about 70 ****ing million people were murdered under that brutal philosophy that you stupid Damn moonbats want to usher into this nation. Just one problem. Before that revolution, they were all ruled by the Tsars. Here? We were free. Kinda hard to start a dictatorship among free people. Some, many, a TON are gonna die. It may be me, but I'll die free. That I can guaran****ingtee you, you bald, fugly, troll-looking bitch.
Holy shit. That's what she looks like?
Balding/thinning hair? I just wish liberals would stop thinking that it is oppressive to actually give a **** about your femininity.
The cousin's historical.
She looks like Benjamin Franklin on the old fifty-cent piece (1948-1963).
Every time someone posts a picture of one of the primitives, it always exceeds my wildest expectations.
Is she the one with the thick accent???
Okay, now sometimes sob-sisters here whine that it’s “not nice†to “make fun of†the way nadin looks.
And to a point, yes, they’re correct; it’s bad taste, and doesn’t reflect well.
However.
However.
However.
The ways in which an individual conducts himself usually determines the ways in which others see that person. Someone who’s physically ugly but pleasant in manner successfully minimizes, or even obliterates, the physical ugliness; one doesn’t see that person as ugly at all.
A smile on any fat woman’s face evaporates about a hundred pounds of her, the way one sees her; a gentleness in her manner magically uncrosses the eyes; a comforting word softly spoken removes a garish blemish.
On the flip side of the coin, someone who’s physically ugly and has a piss-poor attitude to match, well, that exaggerates and exacerbates the physical ugliness, making one appear grotesque.
A good attitude about people and things beautifies one; a sour attitude uglifies one.
Well, as the cousin isn’t exactly known for any pleasantness, for any mellowness, for any laid-backness, for any welcoming acceptance of all those people and ideas coming her way, for any warm self-deprecating humor, for any charity and kindness (although one will admit nadin’s probably kind to animals, especially birds), for any tolerance and the admission that she’s human, fallible, well, one can imagine why people see nadin the ways they do.
It’s her own fault; if she were a more pleasant sort of person, some might even think her aesthetic.
You're asking the wrong person on that, sir.
<<<deaf; has no idea what the cousin sounds like.
<<< Wishes he had never be exposed to the pictures and audio of Nadin.
The cousin makes me vomitous, alleging to know something about history.From the wayback machine, here she is talking about Teapot Dome and the after-effects
The cousin may get things right once in a while--such as the date of the Norman Invasion of England or the date of the Declaration of Independence--but it's always better to check with a second source.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1517974And here, the explanation, with a link, which she obviously did not read
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore
Mon Jul-18-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message where it is first mentioned
4. teapot dome?
Oh, rats, someone who actually knows history, or read the link says
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore
Mon Jul-18-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. US History the scandal that led to the Sherman Anti Trust
Act... Short version... it went all the way to the Cabinet where land was given to an oil company. and there was a tiddy, bity of corruption... it almost brought Harding down. If we had a Parliamentary system it would have.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teapot_Dome_scandal
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore
Mon Jul-18-11 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sherman Anti-trust was enacted in 1890
The Teapot Dome scandal was in the 1920s.
In 1905 the Navy sided with the rebels. Why the Navy was never trusted by the Soviets. In 1917 the army broke for the people while the police was still breaking skulls. Army units formed the first Soviets, (people's councils). As the civil war broke the army did as well. It was between the white forces under Alexandr Kerensky and the Red Forces.
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore
Mon Jul-18-11 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sherman Anti-trust was enacted in 1890
The Teapot Dome scandal was in the 1920s.
Every time someone posts a picture of one of the primitives, it always exceeds my wildest expectations.
Is she the one with the thick accent???
From the wayback machine, here she is talking about Teapot Dome and the after-effectsand the explanation, with a link, which she obviously did not readOh, rats, someone who actually knows history, or read the link says.....
(http://s29.postimg.org/4hejrrgjr/nadin_meme.jpg)
(http://s29.postimg.org/4hejrrgjr/nadin_meme.jpg)
Oh damn.
This really makes me cringe, the cousin alleging herself to know something about history.
Now, one doesn't expect the average person to know, for example, that the English Civil War preceded the Glorious Revolution by fifty or so years, because the average person isn't that much into English history of the 17th century.
And so if the average person makes a mistaken assertion about it, it's forgiveable.
But for someone who claims to be a "trained historian," damned near Infallible, smarter than God, such a mistake wouldn't be forgiveable.
And this opens up a whole big Pandora's box--if the cousin alleges herself to know something about history, and obviously doesn't, what else is she "expert" in, that she really doesn't know shit about?
Holy shit. That's what she looks like?
Balding/thinning hair? I just wish liberals would stop thinking that it is oppressive to actually give a **** about your femininity.
(http://s29.postimg.org/4hejrrgjr/nadin_meme.jpg)
Especially since today's "trained historians" have google. No excuse for this at all when about the only thing she does well is google.That ability is now in question. :)
Cindie
Oh, there's worse, and you'll probably see them, the longer you're around.
That ability is now in question. :)
Especially since today's "trained historians" have google. No excuse for this at all when about the only thing she doeswellis google.
Cindie