The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on February 16, 2014, 03:45:30 PM
-
boston bean (19,311 posts)
Hey women
I don't like being compared to an ape, and that my sex life is the same as an ape, do you.
For that matter, I would think most men wouldn't like to have their sex life compared to an ape either.
hobbit709 (29,715 posts)
3. Bonobos, like humans are apes, not monkeys.
boston bean (19,311 posts)
6. humans are not apes by the way and apes aren't human, btw.
hobbit709 (29,715 posts)
10. Learn a little biology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape
We share 99% of our DNA with chimps.
And they're off!
(their meds)
Nika (472 posts)
86. We are apes, many biologists agree with this.
It is speciocentric to consider humans not apes for spiritual/religious reasons. As far as taxonomic nomenclature goes, we are definitely apes. Screw the "we are the pinnacle of creation bullshit. And we are apes that are destroying this planet, we deserve extinction more and more as time goes on.
1. What other species could ever be accused of being speciocentric in a negative way?
2. How do we "deserve" anything in a world supposedly fashioned by nothing more than randomness?
3. If humanity is the only species that can be speciocentric and capable of deserving Fate A or Fate B then does hat not make humanity the pinnacle of creation"?
seabeyond (92,379 posts)
219. i am talking the real issue, and do not give a shit what we call ourselves. but i do care about men
using this to once again, organize a religion in the name of science to dominate and control women, demanding we be submissive.
Shivering Jemmy (693 posts)
273. Humans are apes
Gorillas, chimps, orangutans, bonobos and humans are all great apes.
boston bean (19,311 posts)
419. Are apes humans?
And then there's a big fight over the D-word vs. the C-word.
seabeyond (92,379 posts)
160. omg. so you use a highly vulgar, vile word toward women because men made sure that word was vile
and vulgar toward women. and if us women CHOOSE to be offend with you using a vile, vulgar, insulting word toward women, knowing that is just what you are doing, it is our fault.
sexism. live and well and an example on your part in privilege.
how dare women say they do not want to hear the c word, it steps on YOUR toes of privilege and entitlement.
Bonobo This message was hidden by Jury decision. Hide
183. Sea, you're a ****ing liar and THAT disgusts me.
You said i used the c-word repeatedly and often and now can't be bothered to back it up. That makes you a cowardly liar. Much more vile of an attack than using a word not aimed at someone. Shame on you for lying about me.
A Jury voted 4-2 to hide this post on Sun Feb 16, 2014, 12:45 PM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
And it goes on
and on
and on
and on
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024508865
-
And a shoutout to our NonCom lagomorph?
Star Member RiffRandell (4,080 posts)
544. Well, I wouldn't mind rabbits.
544 responses to the OP. They are an entertaining bunch, aren't they?
:rofl:
-
It's w-a-a-a-a-y too early, but I bet if the voting for Top DUmmies of 2014 were taking place right now, the seabitch'd be a runaway landslide winner for top spot.
-
Can anyone argue that they are insane?
Amusing though,guess that means any reference to Okong can no longer be racist. :fuelfire:
-
Response to msanthrope (Reply #483)Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:15 PM
Star Member boston bean (19,314 posts)
491. really, could you pm me those feminists who are anti evolution? nt
Response to msanthrope (Reply #509)Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:34 PM
Star Member boston bean (19,314 posts)
510. wow, hostile much?
I asked you to pm me the names of anti evolutionary feminists.
And this is the response?
Response to msanthrope (Reply #516)Sun Feb 16, 2014, 03:45 PM
Star Member boston bean (19,314 posts)
520. by all means, respond with the names here.
I was only offering that in an attempt to be sensitive to your concerns.
If you think I'm an anti science person after reading through this thread... well, think what you want. I don't know what else to tell you. So, I assume I am one of the ones you would put in that category.
I have no idea what you mean by jersey # 46.
Response to msanthrope (Reply #530)Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:58 PM
Star Member boston bean (19,314 posts)
567. Yes, I need the names, cause I don't know who you are talking about.
Secondly, really I have no idea what you mean by jersey # 46.
(http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i475/Delmar59/hB13C7167_zps06e31b67.jpeg) (http://s1095.photobucket.com/user/Delmar59/media/hB13C7167_zps06e31b67.jpeg.html)
-
Many of the posters in that thread mentioned apes and humans share some great amount of DNA, and inasmuch as they were all quite fond of calling the former President "chimp", one wonders why their panties become so wadded if they see a photo of the current President photo shopped with a banana?
-
I would suggest that one of the "humans are speciocentric " primitives go to the zoo and hope in to the gorilla exhibit and find out how speciocentric gorillas are.
-
Can anyone argue that they are insane?
No. The science is settled.
-
All mammals have some genetic traits in common. That's because they're all MAMMALS. Same for every other species group. That doesn't mean we're apes. Of course, in the DUmmie's case, many of them are whales.
Cindie
-
hobbit709 (29,715 posts)
We share 99% of our DNA with chimps.
That makes you an eeeevil one percenter- doesn't it, DUmmy?
-
That makes you an eeeevil one percenter- doesn't it, DUmmy?
That, sir, is Hi-5 worthy...
-
All mammals have some genetic traits in common. That's because they're all MAMMALS. Same for every other species group. That doesn't mean we're apes. Of course, in the DUmmie's case, many of them are whales.
Cindie
Hell, why restrict it to mammals? Humans share 97% of their DNA with frogs (the beady-eyed amphibians, not the Frenchmen).
-
Hell, why restrict it to mammals? Humans share 97% of their DNA with frogs (the beady-eyed amphibians, not the Frenchmen).
Actually, humans share considerably less DNA with Frenchmen.
:rimshot:
:rocker2:
-
I wonder if Seabeyond watches LMN (Lifetime Movie Network aka Lousy Men Network)?
From what I've seen on most LMN movies if a man does something bad it is because he is a lousy man and if a woman does something bad it is because a lousy man drove her to it.
-
seabeyond (92,379 posts)
160. omg. so you use a highly vulgar, vile word toward women because men made sure that word was vile
and vulgar toward women. and if us women CHOOSE to be offend with you using a vile, vulgar, insulting word toward women, knowing that is just what you are doing, it is our fault.
sexism. live and well and an example on your part in privilege.
how dare women say they do not want to hear the c word, it steps on YOUR toes of privilege and entitlement.
Yo, scrunt, make me a sammich, and make sure the beer is cold and open when you fetch it.
Get the laundry done, too, you lazy waste of oxygen.
Personally, I don't think even Stevenumbers would do that. :puke:
-
All mammals have some genetic traits in common. That's because they're all MAMMALS. Same for every other species group. That doesn't mean we're apes. Of course, in the DUmmie's case, many of them are whales.
Cindie
And, in one case, a walrus.
-
And, in one case, a walrus.
An unemployed walrus. :-)
-
An unemployed walrus. :-)
...with a remote but no TV.
-
And, in one case, a walrus.
An unemployed walrus. :-)
...with a remote but no TV.
Calling in bomb threats... :rotf:
-
Judging by the amount of shit they throw at each other, no wonder they think they are apes.
-
Judging by the amount of shit they throw at each other, no wonder they think they are apes.
Exactly. It seems like every thread, no matter the topic, turns into a flame war over there.
-
Exactly. It seems like every thread, no matter the topic, turns into a flame war over there.
Bunch of whiny little bitches, and those are the males.
-
Bunch of whiny little bitches, and those are the males.
You missed this emoticon:
:gay: