The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on February 09, 2014, 03:21:56 PM

Title: Oh Nads...
Post by: formerlurker on February 09, 2014, 03:21:56 PM
Quote
   nadinbrzezinski    2 hrs ago    #1

Response to RandySF (Original post)

Sun Feb 9, 2014, 02:05 PM

nadinbrzezinski (129,444 posts)
1. Yup, good politics USA is covering my local nooz

I don't have to bother, nor would I bother for DU.

Nor will go into why these elections might signal a change. If it is not on national news, it does not matter.

http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024470258


Yet you go out of your way to post on the local news threads though don't you Nads?  :yawn:

Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: NHSparky on February 09, 2014, 04:10:56 PM
Has anything this hag ever said made any sense?  Even just once?
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Dori on February 09, 2014, 04:17:33 PM
She's still butt hurt about being chastised for posting local news.





Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Skul on February 09, 2014, 04:39:27 PM
She's still butt hurt about being chastised for posting local news.
Is that a local butt-hurt, or national?  :???:
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: NHSparky on February 09, 2014, 04:41:44 PM
Is that a local butt-hurt, or national?  :???:

Doesn't matter if it's "crunchy."
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 09, 2014, 04:46:10 PM
Has anything this hag ever said made any sense?  Even just once?

Well, there was this one time...

At journo camp...

 :-)
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 09, 2014, 10:18:33 PM
I really WANT to know if the dead weeds in a San Diego vacant lot catch fire!

I WANT to see blurry, uncentered shots from The Good Rig!

And it's great to see a journo/photog put the bullies in their place!

Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Crazy Horse on February 10, 2014, 04:44:26 PM
Well, there was this one time...

At journo camp...

 :-)

Oh, that's just disgusting
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: 67 Rover on February 12, 2014, 08:03:18 AM
Quote
   nadinbrzezinski    2 hrs ago    #1

Response to RandySF (Original post)

Sun Feb 9, 2014, 02:05 PM

nadinbrzezinski (129,444 posts)
1. Yup, good politics USA is covering my local nooz

I don't have to bother, nor would I bother for DU.

Nor will go into why these elections might signal a change. If it is not on national news, it does not matter.


I think this is probably what it is referring to.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/feb/11/alvarez-faulconer-mayor-election-results/

"Faulconer had 55.2 percent compared to Alvarez’s 44.8 percent with 86 percent of the city's precincts counted."

Feinstein, Boxer and Obama all endorsed Alvarez.  Bwahahahahahaha!  :rofl:
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: franksolich on February 12, 2014, 08:13:14 AM

I think this is probably what it is referring to.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/feb/11/alvarez-faulconer-mayor-election-results/

"Faulconer had 55.2 percent compared to Alvarez’s 44.8 percent with 86 percent of the city's precincts counted."

Feinstein, Boxer and Obama all endorsed Alvarez.  Bwahahahahahaha!  :rofl:


WHOA-HO!

The cousin's Democrat candidate lost, and by a wide margin!

The comments are pretty good, at that link.

<<<doing a happy dance.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: JakeStyle on February 12, 2014, 08:19:27 AM
nadin did her election night coverage here (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10405526) kinda funny.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: 67 Rover on February 12, 2014, 10:27:47 AM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (129,577 posts)
14. Ok that was wild

channel ten, was there an election today? MEHH!

Now channel five, (that be fox) extensive coverage, and... either a slip of the tongue...

The reporter pointed to the stage at the US Grant where Faulconer will give "his concession speech."

They have been in the field all day, so there is a chance they know something we don't. Oh and from Wu at the Registrar, turnout is between 45-50%, higher than the primary to be exact.

If my tea leaves skills are right, we might even have a short night. Turnout is not favoring Kevin Faulconer.


 :rofl:  Remove Tea leave reader from the list of Nads accomplishments.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 12, 2014, 10:41:16 AM
Quote
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 05:43 PM
nadinbrzezinski (129,577 posts)
I will abstain why I think this, on this site. It really matters not to DU.

Though I expect a long night tomorrow, going over returns.
 
Again, none of that will be posted here. Unless NBC covers it, it does not matter to DU.


Quote
Response to nadinbrzezinski
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 07:25 PM
sad-cafe (1,090 posts) (One of the few DUmmies with zero hearts)
6. why bother

if we are so bad? Why bother?
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 12, 2014, 11:12:45 AM
Quote
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 09:12 PM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)

If my tea leaves skills are right, we might even have a short night. Turnout is not favoring Kevin Faulconer.
Faulconer is the repuke candidate for San Diego mayor. The crazy bald dwarf hates him.


Quote
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:22 PM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
23. Well early returns match exactly what I expected

Faulconer is ahead... no whoopy doo. Alvarez people said that if they are at a five point differential by 8:30 they expect to do well.
Alvarez is the democrat candidate. DUmp loves him.


No problem. nadin has it under control.
Quote
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 11:10 PM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
22. Not surprising

Precincts: 582
Counted: 9
Percentage: 1.6%


KEVIN FAULCONER
94354
56.64%
DAVID ALVAREZ
72245
43.36%
Vote totals make no sense. 166,000 total votes from just nine precincts?
Is there a chance nadin screwed this up?


Uh oh.
Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 12:23 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
26. FINALLY update

THESE RESULTS ARE UNOFFICIAL
Last updated on: 02-11-14 at: 21:16:52

Precincts: 582
Counted: 14
Percentage: 2.4%
 
KEVIN FAULCONER
94993
56.63%
DAVID ALVAREZ
72741
43.37%



Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 12:48 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
27. Next update

still early, but this was not expected by me


Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:06 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
28. Next update

but the South of Eight have not come in yet

THESE RESULTS ARE UNOFFICIAL
Last updated on: 02-11-14 at: 22:02:23

Precincts: 582
Counted: 117
Percentage: 20.1%

Vote for: 1
KEVIN FAULCONER
102182
56.70%
DAVID ALVAREZ
78035
43.30%


Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:37 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
29. Not good

THESE RESULTS ARE UNOFFICIAL
Last updated on: 02-11-14 at: 22:33:23

Precincts: 582
Counted: 366
Percentage: 62.9%

Vote for: 1
KEVIN FAULCONER
120199
55.39%
DAVID ALVAREZ
96805
44.61%

This is way too strange, Ok, they were within margin of error.

So we will see. One in the morning is when they expect to have it counted it up
We need TruthIsAll! The repukes are stealing this election!


Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 01:44 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
30. As expected Faulconer is declaring victory
"As expected"??

Just a few hours ago it was: "If my tea leaves skills are right, we might even have a short night. Turnout is not favoring Kevin Faulconer."


Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 02:07 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
31. Ok I will call it now for Faulconer

I did not read the tea leaves right.
Is this the first time she's admitted being wrong?

Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on February 12, 2014, 11:20:06 AM
Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 02:07 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
31. Ok I will call it now for Faulconer

I did not read the tea leaves right.

Someone alert CBS/CNN/FOX/ABC/MSNBC!!!! Nads made a call in an election!
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 12, 2014, 11:30:06 AM

"As expected"??

Just a few hours ago it was: "If my tea leaves skills are right, we might even have a short night. Turnout is not favoring Kevin Faulconer."

Is this the first time she's admitted being wrong?


It's not her fault, really; as we all know, tea comes from Bushes.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Dori on February 12, 2014, 11:31:51 AM
Quote
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 09:12 PM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)

If my tea leaves skills are right, we might even have a short night. Turnout is not favoring Kevin Faulconer.

You used the wrong kind of tea.
 
It was an Earl Gray night.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: obumazombie on February 12, 2014, 12:03:53 PM
I'll have an LGBLT sandwich. Hold the lettuce, nadin will need it for her word salad.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Karin on February 12, 2014, 12:22:01 PM
Oh, this was on national news this morning alright.  A southern CA city elects a repuke mayor!  It's historic.  Nadin, I thought of you right away.  

Congrats to the victor!   :cheersmate:

Someone in a comments section haz a rant:

Quote
What moves you to think that it is well and good that your candidate receives backing of any kind by people who support him but that our candidate is somehow tainted because he has people who support him in various ways.

Do not speak to me about big business, because tax money is funded through your voters digestive tract and reproductive organs and turned over to the Big Businesses, who also support your candidate. Your cabal of parasites and slugs and malingerers and hordes of 28 year old grandmothers are not better because they choose to be parasites.

Our people generally produce. I remember when the Latin group was among the most industrious in the United States. In Texas it used to be 96% were almost afflicted with a positive work ethic and a tendency to do well in small business. After 50 years of the Great Society, AFDC, Head Start, WIC, Medicaid, section 8, food stamps, and the invitation to anchorbabymothers of the world to whelp on Tierra Americana so as to gain a perpetual free ride with my children and grandchildren paying for it, we can see the Latin cohort falling into the septic pit of slavery the same as the Black folks who chose bondage instead of liberty during the past 50 years.

Amen, brother!
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: AllosaursRus on February 12, 2014, 12:39:05 PM
I'll have an LGBLT sandwich. Hold the lettuce, nadin will need it for her word salad.

Heh! The only way I eat an LBT! **** a bunch 'o rabbit food! Mmmmmmmmmmmmm BACON! I left the "G" out since I'm not of that persuasion.

Quote
Wed Feb 12, 2014, 12:48 AM
nadinbrzezinski (129,578 posts)
27. Next update

still early, but this was not expected by me

Call the national Guard!!!! NadaBrain was wrong!!!
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Tess Anderson on February 12, 2014, 11:18:00 PM
 :rotf:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024489347

so this may be what she's babbling about:

Quote

Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #12)

Wed Feb 12, 2014, 05:12 PM

 nadinbrzezinski (129,607 posts)

13. Manny I am beyond doing any analysis here

any more.

Hell, after a few encounters over the last few I am beyond engaging most of DU.


I say, let the chips fall and all that

PLONK!!!
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Dori on February 12, 2014, 11:28:07 PM
Oh, this was on national news this morning alright.  A southern CA city elects a repuke mayor!  It's historic.  Nadin, I thought of you right away.  

Congrats to the victor!   :cheersmate:

Someone in a comments section haz a rant:

Amen, brother!

OMG.....that rant needs to be framed - epic

Is there a link for it?
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: RobJohnson on February 13, 2014, 05:51:52 AM
She's still butt hurt about being chastised for posting local news.








I doubt there is much that could hurt her butt.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Karin on February 13, 2014, 07:14:02 AM
OMG.....that rant needs to be framed - epic

Is there a link for it?


http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/feb/11/alvarez-faulconer-mayor-election-results/

It's in the comments section, about half way down. 

Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: RobJohnson on February 13, 2014, 08:41:02 AM
I'll have an LGBLT sandwich. Hold the lettuce, nadin will need it for her word salad.


 :lmao:
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: RobJohnson on February 13, 2014, 08:44:54 AM
Someone alert CBS/CNN/FOX/ABC/MSNBC!!!! Nads made a call in an election!

Update her resume.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: seahorse513 on February 13, 2014, 11:57:44 AM
I have a gnads headache!!.... :thatsright:
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 13, 2014, 06:04:54 PM
Quote
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #1)
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 05:19 PM
sad-cafe (1,093 posts)
3. why do you call it nooz?

really, I am asking.

A bully!
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: obumazombie on February 14, 2014, 02:34:08 AM

A bully!

Because it is so boring reporting that it induces short snoozes...nooz !
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: franksolich on February 14, 2014, 03:35:08 AM

A bully!


Quote
nadinbrzezinski (129,667 posts)    Mon Feb 10, 2014, 05:43 PM

5. Of course you need to apply individually for absentee ballots

Hell, lord knows I considered it after missing the last election due to a family emergency.
 
But after that... pretty much. I will abstain why I think this, on this site. It really matters not to DU. Though I expect a long night tomorrow, going over returns. Again, none of that will be posted here. Unless NBC covers it, it does not matter to DU.

Quote
sad-cafe (1,093 posts)    Mon Feb 10, 2014, 07:25 PM

6. why bother

if we are so bad? Why bother?
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Skul on February 14, 2014, 06:55:05 AM
Skimmer needs to create a new forum just for her.....gNads gNooz.
Everybody is on ignore, and it remains permanently locked.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: obumazombie on February 14, 2014, 07:44:26 AM
She might be better of starting all over as a cub reporter.
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: vesta111 on February 14, 2014, 07:53:49 AM
Skimmer needs to create a new forum just for her.....gNads gNooz.
Everybody is on ignore, and it remains permanently locked.


I have a question here-------How did the Chief on board a Submarine ever get involved with Nads and the Democrats ?

From what I gather he has retired and now working some kind of security, armed or unarmed.

To me the story of his life is much more interesting then his wife's,  What is he thinking ?

No divorce, married so long his pension and # SS could go to her. What to do if she divorced him---- Bad Day at Black Rock Mountain.

His time has passed the 10 year marriage clause to divorce her and move on. No kids and just run away.  

Reason I ask is I know of and known for 25 years a couple much like them.   Poor guy, slavery or murder is the result for the Male.  

What you want to bet she came into the marriage slugging away as a minority who was excused from any actions and bullied her way to become president of the Chiefs wives club.

When husband retired and she went back to work in a company she began in years ago, to take in food and do favors for all in the office staff while demanding they heir her husband.

Finally a place was opened that had nothing to do with husbands military training,  Her husband came in, a good looking fella and she was a Nads clone that pushed and bullied her way to get what she wanted.

I would like to hear the other story from the men that manage to survive and why they did from a life of interesting possibilities.    
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 14, 2014, 11:35:25 AM
Quote
Though I expect a long night tomorrow, going over returns. Again, none of that will be posted here.

And then she proceeded to post every few minutes on election night, including her reading of the tea leaves (which failed to detect a huge landslide).
Title: Re: Oh Nads...
Post by: Charles Henrickson on February 14, 2014, 01:16:17 PM
Quote from: Know-it-all Nadin
If my tea leaves skills are right, we might even have a short night. Turnout is not favoring Kevin Faulconer. . . . .

still early, but this was not expected by me. . . .

As expected Faulconer is declaring victory. . . .

Ok I will call it now for Faulconer. I did not read the tea leaves right.

Nadstradamus got it WRONG??? Call Ripley!!

No, Nadin, you did not get it wrong. You and I both know what happened:

(http://www.northcantonstem.org/images/diebold.jpg)

VOTER-VERIFIED PAPER BALLOTS! DU IT FOR ANDY!