The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Mr Mannn on January 16, 2014, 06:23:17 AM
-
The Feminazi squads have been terrorizing DU. Everything is sexist, everything is rape, and All men are evil. They will mass alert on threads, shut down all dissenting opinion, and writhe in agony over their outrage.
I kinda think their is method to their madness. I think the gals are prepping the way for Hillary. After all the Republican establishment is deathly afraid of criticizing Obama for fear of being called racist. They want the same immunity for Hillary. But sexism doesn't have the same stigma as racism does. So the groundwork must be laid, and DU is the testing grounds.
On the other hand...it is DU, and the whole storm the threads thing could just be a feminist power: raw emotion with no real thought behind it.
So I put up a little poll to see what y'all think.
-
I vote for "PhDD is whipping her fellow Klams into a lather, because she was spanked so badly at the Conservative Cave."
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag72/conscave/mclintock-spanking-o_zps97150e43.gif)
-
I was torn between "no sex" and "that time" and chose the latter -- but it must be awful that EVERY DAY is that time of the month.
Actually, the right answer is "Ugly and mad at the entire Universe for making them so."
-
They (the Neo-KKK or the Klams) are acting the part of every other socialist group that has ever vied for control of any political apparatus in human history.
I voted: They LIKE the power of mass alerts
But mostly, they LIKE the power that comes from silencing any and all opposition. Their goal is to rid the hive of all moderates and all who are squeamish to their rule.
-
I was torn between "no sex" and "that time" and chose the latter -- but it must be awful that EVERY DAY is that time of the month.
Actually, the right answer is "Ugly and mad at the entire Universe for making them so."
:yeahthat: :werd: :agree:
-
BSed for forgetting one option . . .
-
They (the Neo-KKK or the Klams) are acting the part of every other socialist group that has ever vied for control of any political apparatus in human history.
I voted: They LIKE the power of mass alerts
But mostly, they LIKE the power that comes from silencing any and all opposition. Their goal is to rid the hive of all moderates and all who are squeamish to their rule.
I went with that for the same reason. I think I shall refer to them as the KKKoven.
-
They (the Neo-KKK or the Klams) are acting the part of every other socialist group that has ever vied for control of any political apparatus in human history.
The "women's movement" was started by Socialist, Marxist commies.
-
The "women's movement" was started by Socialist, Marxist commies.
Which is so ironic because like most of the Socialist Group movements they just use them to get into power then throw them to the wayside.
-
Which is so ironic because like most of the Socialist Group movements they just use them to get into power then throw them to the wayside.
Demoralization was the name of the game. And it worked.
-
Which is so ironic because like most of the Socialist Group movements they just use them to get into power then throw them to the wayside.
You mean like the dems talking about equal pay, but every dem congressman and even Obama pay their female staffers less than the men working for them?
-
You mean like the dems talking about equal pay, but every dem congressman and even Obama pay their female staffers less than the men working for them?
It's well documented in history like Hitler using the gays to get in power then making homosexuality illegal in 1933.
-
Which is so ironic because like most of the Socialist Group movements they just use them to get into power then throw them to the wayside.
Dirty girls like it that way.
-
All for hiilary.
Cry sexism enough and they figure they can pull a barryO.
-
All for hiilary.
Cry sexism enough and they figure they can pull a barryO.
I don't think that'll sell anywhere near as well as "Man of color" did with the Black and Hispanic voters.
-
I don't think that'll sell anywhere near as well as "Man of color" did with the Black and Hispanic voters.
Especially after Dianne Feinstein slapped down the puff piece on Benghazi that the New York Times wrote.
-
I don't think that'll sell anywhere near as well as "Man of color" did with the Black and Hispanic voters.
I'm sure of that. It doesn't stop the KKKlams from trying.
Sexist just doesn't have the same mass appeal as racist.
It only makes the Klams moist. :naughty:
Forgive for that. :whistling:
-
I vote for "PhDD is whipping her fellow Klams into a lather, because she was spanked so badly at the Conservative Cave."
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag72/conscave/mclintock-spanking-o_zps97150e43.gif)
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
:hi5:
...and one of my favorite movies!
The "women's movement" was started by Socialist, Marxist commies.
Most definitely.
They want Killary McPIAPS Behghazi.
-
The most viscous people I have ever seen are women on women. Well to be more precise black women on white woman. I don't think the tribalism of womanhood will be as strong as the black culture is.
-
The most viscous people I have ever seen are women on women. Well to be more precise black women on white woman. I don't think the tribalism of womanhood will be as strong as the black culture is.
Wow, just imagine if Michelle decided to run against Hillary. :yahoo:
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
As for women being nasty to women, that too is a result of sexism. The fact is women are raised in this culture to revere men and see other women as competition. That kind of sexism has to be consciously combated in oneself. Some women internalize that misogyny more than others, and as a result they can be vicious against other women. Everyone has met someone like that. They have no or few female friends, much prefer the company of men, judge other women on sexist societal standards about physical attractiveness and body image. My view is that it's not possible for them to hate other women without also hating themselves. By the way, this is something that pervades political party and ideology. One sees it among liberals, moderates, and conservatives.
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
Empirical evidence of feminazis running rampant at the DUmp suggest you have rose(?) colored glasses
As for women being nasty to women, that too is a result of sexism. The fact is women are raised in this culture to revere men and see other women as competition. That kind of sexism has to be consciously combated in oneself. Some women internalize that misogyny more than others, and as a result they can be vicious against other women. Everyone has met someone like that. They have no or few female friends, much prefer the company of men, judge other women on sexist societal standards about physical attractiveness and body image. My view is that it's not possible for them to hate other women without also hating themselves. By the way, this is something that pervades political party and ideology. One sees it among liberals, moderates, and conservatives.
So...
1) Women on women aggression is a result of male sexism
2) Women on male aggression is a result of male sexism
3) Women on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
4) Male on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
5) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEMALE SEXISM
Thanks for coming here to make our point. You summarized everything wrong with feminism better than the crazy feminazi threads at DU could ever have done.
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
Yet Skinner says that the alert system is working as designed and not being gamed in the way you describe. Does that mean Skinner is a sexist?
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
$kinner turning the common area of the asylum into an arena was a stroke of genius! Let the lunatics sort each other out, hose the feces and blood from the wall, turn 'em loose again.
Brilliant!
Who knew Lord of the Flies could come to life?
As for women being nasty to women, that too is a result of sexism. The fact is women are raised in this culture to revere men and see other women as competition.
Or it could be natural hardwiring.
That kind of sexism has to be consciously combated in oneself.
Yeah, because the most strident among the dick choppers are obviously doing the best job at it, huh?
:whatever:
Seriously, why are you back here?
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
As for women being nasty to women, that too is a result of sexism. The fact is women are raised in this culture to revere men and see other women as competition. That kind of sexism has to be consciously combated in oneself. Some women internalize that misogyny more than others, and as a result they can be vicious against other women. Everyone has met someone like that. They have no or few female friends, much prefer the company of men, judge other women on sexist societal standards about physical attractiveness and body image. My view is that it's not possible for them to hate other women without also hating themselves. By the way, this is something that pervades political party and ideology. One sees it among liberals, moderates, and conservatives.
Let me guess. You got that information from one of your women's studies classes. The second paragraph seems to describe you pretty well, Alex, given your attention-whoring tendencies here at the cave.
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah
(ruffles feathers) Squawk! Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw Caw
You silly emotional girl. Hush now. Its time for the menfolk to talk about important things.
-
So...
1) Women on women aggression is a result of male sexism
2) Women on male aggression is a result of male sexism
3) Women on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
4) Male on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
5) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEMALE SEXISM
Thanks for coming here to make our point. You summarized everything wrong with feminism better than the crazy feminazi threads at DU could ever have done.
This! :cheersmate:
-
So...
1) Women on women aggression is a result of male sexism
2) Women on male aggression is a result of male sexism
3) Women on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
4) Male on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
5) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEMALE SEXISM
Thanks for coming here to make our point. You summarized everything wrong with feminism better than the crazy feminazi threads at DU could ever have done.
^5!!! :clap: :clap: :clap:
-
So...
1) Women on women aggression is a result of male sexism
2) Women on male aggression is a result of male sexism
3) Women on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
4) Male on themselves aggression is a result of male sexism
5) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEMALE SEXISM
Thanks for coming here to make our point. You summarized everything wrong with feminism better than the crazy feminazi threads at DU could ever have done.
No, that is not what I said. I said people alert stalk HOF posters because they don't like us. I didn't say it was the result of sexism. They don't want to hear about sexism, rape, violence against women, and other related issues, and would like to get rid of people who raise those concerns.
People dislike people for all kinds of reasons. Anyone can dislike a few people or even a lot of people without its being attributed to any ism. But when someone hates all women, that is by definition misogyny.
The men's group loves to whine about misandry and pretend its on par with misogyny. A woman can dislike men. She could even hate all men, but that is an issue that stops at the individual level. It is not enforced through a power structure that perpetuates discrimination as is the case against women.
There are cases where women are in positions of power, as employers for example, and abuse their position against men in their employ in sexist ways. Men have the same recourse through the civil court system as women do in similar circumstances.
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
I serve on quite a few juries (because I'm a DU member in good standing, you know) and I always vote in favor of the HOFFER huffing heifers.
As for women being nasty to women, that too is a result of sexism. The fact is women are raised in this culture to revere men and see other women as competition. That kind of sexism has to be consciously combated in oneself. Some women internalize that misogyny more than others, and as a result they can be vicious against other women. Everyone has met someone like that. They have no or few female friends, much prefer the company of men, judge other women on sexist societal standards about physical attractiveness and body image. My view is that it's not possible for them to hate other women without also hating themselves. By the way, this is something that pervades political party and ideology. One sees it among liberals, moderates, and conservatives.
So, what you're saying is women are weak, dim-witted, infantile and have to be carefully instructed on how to think properly.
I can only imagine how much you'd be squealing if a man suggested such an opinion about women.
I guess you must think your vagina grants you special privilege or something.
-
So, what you're saying is women are weak, dim-witted, infantile and have to be carefully instructed on how to think properly.
I can only imagine how much you'd be squealing if a man suggested such an opinion about women.
I guess you must think your vagina grants you special privilege or something.
No, that is NOT what I am saying. I am saying that because we grow up in a sexist society, we are exposed to messages that value men over women. Some women develop an awareness of that, others less so. A certain percentage target other women as their enemies and attack other women in order to curry favor with men. There is nothing natural or biological about women not getting along, anymore than men not getting along. Behavior is learned.
-
No, that is not what I said. I said people alert stalk HOF posters because they don't like us. I didn't say it was the result of sexism. They don't want to hear about sexism, rape, violence against women, over and over again. Being attacked over every little thing suddenly becoming sexist. Or the idea that feminists are presenting ALL men as rapists.
Maybe feminists overreacting is the problem at DU. Stop being so emotional and start treating others as adults. Stop calling all men rapists. Stop the bullying alerts, and maybe DUers will stop alerting on you.
At DU, it's the feminists who are the bullies. Your complaint is the simple reaction to your abuse.
I really shouldn't have to explain this to you. We've been laughing at Feminazi terrorism on DU for a while now. Pity you had to hear it here and not amongst friends at DU.
-
No, that is NOT what I am saying. I am saying that because we grow up in a sexist society, we are exposed to messages that value men over women. Some women develop an awareness of that, others less so. A certain percentage target other women as their enemies and attack other women in order to curry favor with men. There is nothing natural or biological about women not getting along, anymore than men not getting along. Behavior is learned.
Yet, men seem immune to these behaviors in themselves with regards to other men.
I can't imagine you re-writing the exact same paragraph about men.
That means what you're saying is women are impressionable and weak and have to be told how to think.
You may not want to admit that is what you're saying but that is still exactly what you're saying.
"Sexist society" is paraphrasing "I accept what people around me think about me and conform to their opinions."
It's like those idiots who claim that since so many black, urban males are seen as drug-dealing, child-abandoning illiterates then they are justified in becoming drug-dealing, child-abandoning illiterates.
Way to reinforce the negative stereotype there, pal!
Either you choose who you want to be as a person or you're too debilitated to be called a person.
Want to be my equal?
PROVE IT!
Prove to me you're not helpless.
Prove to me you're not lazy.
Prove to me you're not weak.
Prove to me you're not worthless.
I don't owe you shit and go **** yourself if you think I do.
I don't need you, yet you constantly claim you need my wallet/esteem/approval.
Stupid ****. Go back to DU and instruct the women in your high moral tones about how morally nceessary it is to be raped rather than shoot a rapist between the eyes because YOU are so scared of guns they're not allowed to defend themselves.
-
No, that is NOT what I am saying. I am saying that because we grow up in a sexist society, we are exposed to messages that value men over women. Some women develop an awareness of that, others less so. A certain percentage target other women as their enemies and attack other women in order to curry favor with men. There is nothing natural or biological about women not getting along, anymore than men not getting along. Behavior is learned.
You're full of shit as a young crow.
It goes both ways you ignorant twit.
You are demanding to wear the victimhood mantle in order to advance your own sexist attitude.
If you wish to see sexism, try a mirror. The truth is there.
-
No, that is NOT what I am saying. I am saying that because we grow up in a sexist society, we are exposed to messages that value men over women. Some women develop an awareness of that, others less so. A certain percentage target other women as their enemies and attack other women in order to curry favor with men. There is nothing natural or biological about women not getting along, anymore than men not getting along. Behavior is learned.
Alex,
You admitted, and amply demonstrated, that you don't know much about economy (a dismaying admission from a PhD in a related field. How can you be an expert in slavery without understanding economy?) You also demonstrated that you don't know much about biology, either.
Male animals don't "get along". They compete for dominance and territory.
(http://m9.i.pbase.com/o6/52/748652/1/75715009.Km6TnjQe._DSC2026.mod.jpg)
(http://www.sharatjaswal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Photos-Of-Gorilla-Fighting-1.jpg)
(http://www.animalspot.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Monkey-Fighting.jpg)
(http://mattsoniak.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Adult_male_chimps_in_mahale.jpg)
Humans are animals. We are animals with the capacity for reason, but we're animals nonetheless.
-
(http://m9.i.pbase.com/o6/52/748652/1/75715009.Km6TnjQe._DSC2026.mod.jpg)
(http://www.sharatjaswal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Photos-Of-Gorilla-Fighting-1.jpg)
(http://www.animalspot.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Monkey-Fighting.jpg)
(http://mattsoniak.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Adult_male_chimps_in_mahale.jpg)
Humans are animals. We are animals with the capacity for reason, but we're animals nonetheless.
I blame white patriarchal Christo-fascist capitalism.
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b_4MlTtnGFU/TtFQFan1nsI/AAAAAAAABFI/75k2E47o33w/s1600/Less-Lip-More-Nip-Funny-Baby.jpg)
-
I blame white patriarchal Christo-fascist capitalism.
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b_4MlTtnGFU/TtFQFan1nsI/AAAAAAAABFI/75k2E47o33w/s1600/Less-Lip-More-Nip-Funny-Baby.jpg)
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
... Pity you had to hear it here and not amongst friends at DU.
"Hearing" and "Listening" are entirely different things, as she never tires of demonstrating.
-
Alex,
You admitted, and amply demonstrated, that you don't know much about economy (a dismaying admission from a PhD in a related field. How can you be an expert in slavery without understanding economy?) You also demonstrated that you don't know much about biology, either.
Male animals don't "get along". They compete for dominance and territory.
Humans are animals. We are animals with the capacity for reason, but we're animals nonetheless.
^This
No matter how much the feminazis try, they will never be happy or satisfied, because they will never be able to change the inborn instincts of the male animal. It's in their DNA.
Same for females too.
-
You all have this story completely turned around. The alert stalking is against the feminists, not by them. Juries are clearly anti-HOF and will hide posts just because they don't like the poster, and allow nasty attacks if they don't like the person the attack is directed against. One person who addressed sexism found himself the target of five hides in a single day (God knows how many alerts it took to carry that off). Not content with the fact he was flagged, the anti-feminists kept up until he had the five hides required to be gone from the site for three months.
Do you really think, on a website that archives the insanity that is DU, that statement will stand up to the slightest scrutiny? How many times would you care to be humiliated?
I would be willing to bet that if you dropped the attitude and actually contributed something to this site other than trying to convince us that you're an innocent victim of some male driven conspiracy, you might find a better place to discuss and debate.