The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Dori on January 04, 2014, 10:18:41 AM
-
LFR's sheepish and indirect quest to tell us what she thinks of conservatives in general, and CC specifically, she posts a false screed by Lawrence O'Donnell Jr. on how wonderful liberals are and how terrible Republicans are. (By her understanding)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024272732
“What did liberals do that was so offensive to the Republican Party? I’ll tell you what they did.
Liberals got women the right to vote.
Liberals got African-Americans the right to vote.
Liberals created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty.
Liberals ended segregation.
Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act.
Liberals created Medicare.
Liberals passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act.
What did Conservatives do? They opposed them on every one of those things, every one. So when you try to hurl that label at my feet, ‘Liberal,’ as if it were something to be ashamed of, something dirty, something to run away from, it won’t work, because I will pick up that label and I will wear it as a badge of honor.â€
I have no idea if O'Donnell was attempting to call Republicans liberals or what his original purpose was when he wrote this.
-
I guess they don't teach history at librul arts college.
-
I guess they don't teach history at librul arts college.
They do but it's fiction.
-
No mention of those racist Southern Democrats who refused to pass any civil rights bill...
-
LFR's sheepish and indirect quest to tell us what she thinks of conservatives in general, and CC specifically, she posts a false screed by Lawrence O'Donnell Jr. on how wonderful liberals are and how terrible Republicans are. (By her understanding)
I have no idea if O'Donnell was attempting to call Republicans liberals or what his original purpose was when he wrote this.
How typical of LFR to steal the words to make a pointless statement with no comment. Just like her real life where she bilks taxpayers to support her lazy a$$ to provide shelter, food and everything else. The parasite can't even bother to add to the leftist lemming followups.
-
And Abraham Lincoln was a democrat.
-
Amber,
In light of your "facts", can you explain what the platform of the Radical Republicans was during Reconstruction?
Let me help you, so that you know what I am talking about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_Republicans
Once you've read that, you might understand this illustration from that time period:
(http://www.freestaterevolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/racist_democrat_poster.jpg)
-
LFR spreads liberal lies. Or LFR spreads for liberals. :fuelfire:
Liberal Edukation is all it takes to be sucksessful in her trade as a shot girl at the titty bar.
SO ... Who's up for jello shots off the tummy?
-
LFR spreads liberal lies. Or LFR spreads for liberals. :fuelfire:
Liberal Edukation is all it takes to be sucksessful in her trade as a shot girl at the titty bar.
SO ... Who's up for jello shots off the tummy?
You could stack a s***load of shots on that tummy.
-
(http://specularphoto.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/HistoryLesson.jpg)
You were saying, DUmmy?
CMD
-
LFR's sheepish and indirect quest to tell us what she thinks of conservatives in general, and CC specifically, she posts a false screed by Lawrence O'Donnell Jr. on how wonderful liberals are and how terrible Republicans are. (By her understanding)
I have no idea if O'Donnell was attempting to call Republicans liberals or what his original purpose was when he wrote this.
Really...suffragists were liberal eh? As I recall many were pro-life as well or at that time anti-eugenics which stands in the face of modern day liberalism. Suffragists also were more 'stately' women who had the fight the view of women being far too emotional to make rational decisions regarding the fate of the nation in election policy. Every liberal women I know is nothing if not an overemotional harpy with few exceptions proving the point not of the suffragists but those who opposed them. Suffragists fought to prove that women were more then hormones encased in skin ready to have the 'vapors' at any offensive content.
Civil rights act? Passed by a larger PERCENTAGE of republicans then democrats. I know silly things like proportion don't matter to liberals, but they are helpful when evaluating things like this. The reality is at that time there were more DEMOCRATS in office, but of both parties, REPUBLICANS voter for it by a larger percentage of party members then did democrats so considering the composition of the overall sitting officials, if the republicans had not voted in the numbers they did, it likely would not have passed.
Social Security does shit to lift anyone out of poverty, let alone the elderly. LFR do you actually know of an elderly person surviving on social security alone? They do not do well.
You are not only devoid of good common sense, but of any grasp of real history. You also are proof of what many liberals have done to us--created or ARE a society of leeches ready to topple the country into the abyss because of their own selfishness and inability to delay or work towards their own long term gratification.LFR YOU are part of the problem, not conservatives. God this piece of trash pisses me off.
Hey LFR, you bear no resemblance either to those for whom many of those social programs were meant to benefit in the great depression. Go look up depression era photos and look at yourself in the mirror and tell me the HUGE difference between the two--well there are a few differences. Look at the weight which is evidence of the availability of food or resources to purchase food versus the very well fed well you. Look at the number of men back then who wanted WORK not charity versus those ie you actively seeking taxpayer funded charity instead of work. Look at the sadness in their faces versus the glee at taking advantage of the taxpaying public and then telling them they are assholes.
YOU LFR bare no resemblance to those faces and should be ashamed with even equating yourself in anyway to the fine working(or wanting to work) people of the past and present who have actually struggled through REAL poverty instead of CREATED poverty.
***Why do I read her shit? She makes me sick to my stomach. What a despicable human being.***
-
Social Security does shit to lift anyone out of poverty, let alone the elderly. LFR do you actually know of an elderly person surviving on social security alone? They do not do well.
^^^^ This.
And consider that 1--it was NEVER considered as a sole source of retirement income, 2--people under 50 will not see the money they put in given back to them given the average lifespan (negative rate of return) if they see anything at all, 3--it actually HARMS the economy, as people who would otherwise be allowed to invest in the market or other means of their choosing would almost certainly do better than SS in the long run, 4--unfunded liabilities in the SS system will ensure that fewer and fewer workers are supporting more and more retirees who live longer than they were ever intended to, 5--were I to offer this type of retirement plan as a private employer, I'd be in the jail cell next to Bernie Maddoff.
Go ahead, LFR. Keep talking your drivel. I can keep this shit up all day.
-
^^^^ This.
And consider that 1--it was NEVER considered as a sole source of retirement income, 2--people under 50 will not see the money they put in given back to them given the average lifespan (negative rate of return) if they see anything at all, 3--it actually HARMS the economy, as people who would otherwise be allowed to invest in the market or other means of their choosing would almost certainly do better than SS in the long run, 4--unfunded liabilities in the SS system will ensure that fewer and fewer workers are supporting more and more retirees who live longer than they were ever intended to, 5--were I to offer this type of retirement plan as a private employer, I'd be in the jail cell next to Bernie Maddoff.
Go ahead, LFR. Keep talking your drivel. I can keep this shit up all day.
HI5 up Sparky!