The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: BannedFromDU on December 15, 2013, 12:49:16 AM

Title: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: BannedFromDU on December 15, 2013, 12:49:16 AM
Quote
Star Member BainsBane (21,332 posts)

Test links Winston's (Heisman trophy winner) DNA to accuser
Thanks to NYC_Skp for finding this article.

Not quite he said she said. There was also a medical report showing bruises and wounds on the victims body. And another article posted on DU earlier this week said that a team mate of Winston's deleted a video of the alleged assault.


November, 20, 2013
NOV 20
11:50
PM ET
By Mark Schlabach | ESPN.com
RECOMMEND600TWEET257COMMENTS51EMAILPRINT


TALLAHASSEE -- A DNA analysis completed by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement on Tuesday confirmed that DNA provided by Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston matched the sample taken from the underwear of a woman who has accused him of sexual battery.

According to the DNA analysis report, a copy of which was viewed by ESPN.com on Wednesday, the Florida state crime lab determined that the chances of the DNA in the woman's underwear are a match for someone other than Winston was one in 2.2 trillion.

Police obtained a sexual assault kit on Dec. 7, 2012, when the accuser reported the alleged incident had occurred at an off-campus apartment. Winston's DNA was recently obtained through a buccal swab he provided to authorities investigating the case.

The DNA match alone does not prove that Winston, a leading Heisman Trophy candidate, sexually assaulted the woman, as the accuser's family claimed in a statement released by a Tampa-based attorney on Wednesday. But it does indicate that Winston, who has yet to talk to Tallahassee police or the state attorney investigating the case, had his DNA associated with the accuser on Dec. 7, 2012, when the accuser claimed she was sexually assaulted at an off-campus apartment.

http://espn.go.com/blog/acc/post/_/id/63665/test-winstons-dna-matches-accuser

3
      
   


There you have it - solid proof that a man had sex. The problem for :jugs: is that the man, you see, failed to have sex with her. (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024179298#post3)


Quote
BainsBane (21,332 posts)
4. It's clear authorities threw the case

http://www.tampabay.com/sports/college/state-attorneys-report-video-of-jameis-winston-encounter-deleted/2155871




Response to BainsBane (Reply #4)

Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:03 AM

Blanket Statements (123 posts)
5. Of course, because he couldn't possibly be innocent

He was accused, therefore he must have done it





Star Member BainsBane (21,332 posts)
6. Read the ****ing article

would it kill you?



Blanket Statements (123 posts)
7. I read it, along with many others

He may have done it, he may not have.
Either way, he wasn't charged with a crime of any kind


Star Member BainsBane (21,332 posts)
9. Like 97% of rape cases

Last edited Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:15 AM - Edit history (1)
the rapist gets away. The police didn't even try to retrieve the video from Potbelly's for more than 30 days. They failed to interview suspects. They collected urine rather than blood samples. They obviously didn't want the guy to face charges. God forbid rape actually be illegal and someone be expected to seek consent before penetrating a woman.

The guy is a rapist and will reoffend, while his fans cheer him on as he does it. That is what rape culture is. That is why rape in endemic and rapists operate with impunity and why 20% of women in this country are raped. It is then systemic violation of the human rights of rape victims, 90% of whom are women.


     Methinks thou doth, well, you know. BainsBane, I wish you the deepest of dickings this holiday season.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: obumazombie on December 15, 2013, 01:15:07 AM
Wasn't the Duke Lacrosse team accused of rape ?
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: dane on December 15, 2013, 03:51:22 AM
Quote
God forbid rape actually be illegal and someone be expected to seek consent before penetrating a woman.

:jugs: is obviously sexist.  The DUmmies recently had a thread about this very thing, where a DUde said he was raped so ask 'him' anything.  (talked about here http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,93066.0.html )
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: BlueStateSaint on December 15, 2013, 06:02:58 AM
Wasn't the Duke Lacrosse team accused of rape ?

Yeah--and what recently happened to the accuser? O-)
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: Carl on December 15, 2013, 06:08:37 AM
Yet eyewitness testimony and physical evidence that Trayvon the thug was pounding the crap out of George Zimmerman should have been ignored because a political verdict was desired.

Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: miskie on December 15, 2013, 06:41:11 AM
*Obviously, the phDD is a racist, -since she wants to prosecute the black man for allegedly raping (as possible photographic evidence suggests) a white girl -even though the DA tossed out the case.

What other reason could there be ?

*See DUmmies, I can play this game too.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: Big Dog on December 15, 2013, 07:45:32 AM
If Obama had a little brother...
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: Dori on December 15, 2013, 12:52:19 PM
I haven't followed this story.  Were drugs and/or alcohol involved again?

Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: GOBUCKS on December 15, 2013, 01:29:19 PM
I haven't followed this story.  Were drugs and/or alcohol involved again?

Has there ever been a sex act between college students that did not involve alcohol?
 
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 15, 2013, 01:46:08 PM
According to DUmmie wymins, men should only have sex when DUmmie wymins rape them.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: jukin on December 15, 2013, 02:12:09 PM
In all seriousness, if the guy had been white and the girl black there would be charges.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 15, 2013, 02:17:40 PM
In all seriousness, if the guy had been white and the girl black there would be charges.
Yeah, and 24/7 news coverage.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: Dori on December 15, 2013, 02:19:36 PM
In all seriousness, if the guy had been white and the girl black there would be charges.

That's true
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: GOBUCKS on December 15, 2013, 02:50:10 PM
Quote
In all seriousness, if the guy had been white and the girl black there would be charges.

Unless money changes hands, that combination is less common than a three-headed kitten.

It's always the other way around.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: AprilRazz on December 16, 2013, 09:18:19 AM
The thread title lead me to think that some primitive male has blessed a woman with the most awkward 2 minutes of her life.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: JohnnyReb on December 16, 2013, 09:34:26 AM
The thread title lead me to think that some primitive male has blessed a woman with the most awkward 2 minutes of her life.
If you subtract the time for undressing and redressing, it comes to 8 seconds or less.
Title: Re: Tests prove a dude had sex; :jugs: is JEALOUS
Post by: landofconfusion80 on December 16, 2013, 10:40:09 AM
If you subtract the time for undressing and redressing, it comes to 8 seconds or less.

I'd imagine those skinny jeans are hard to get out of.