The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Skul on November 21, 2013, 03:26:09 PM

Title: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Skul on November 21, 2013, 03:26:09 PM
This OP might prove to be fun.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024071026
Quote
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:04 PM
Star Member Tx4obama (34,756 posts)

Republicans have already found a way to F*CK up the judicial nominees !!!!!!!!!! YAY!!1!11!!!
   
Last edited Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:15 PM - Edit history (1)
 
Today the Senate Judicial Committee  had an Executive Business Meeting schedule to vote 10 nominees out of committee so that they would be sent to the full Senate.

Looks like perhaps the republicans on the committee did not show up so there was no quorum!

The Senate Judiciary Committee held an executive business meeting to consider pending nominations and legislation on November 21, 2013. A quorum was not present, and the Committee was not able to complete action on pending matters. The meeting recessed subject to the call of the Chair.

http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/

Current members of the Senate Judiciary Committee:

Democrats: 

 Patrick Leahy, Vermont, Chairman
 Dianne Feinstein, California
 Chuck Schumer, New York
 Dick Durbin, Illinois
 Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island
 Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota
 Al Franken, Minnesota
 Chris Coons, Delaware
 Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut
 Mazie Hirono, Hawaii

Republicans:

 Chuck Grassley, Iowa, Ranking Member
 Orrin Hatch, Utah
 Jeff Sessions, Alabama
 Lindsey Graham, South Carolina
 John Cornyn, Texas
 Mike Lee, Utah
 Ted Cruz, Texas
 Jeff Flake, Arizona

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Senate_Judiciary_Committee 
Naturally, the little Nazis are not pleased.
Quote
Response to Tx4obama (Original post)
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:11 PM

KamaAina (48,404 posts)

1. Oh dear FSM, you're right!  :panic: :panic: :panic: :panic: :panic: :panic:

http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/committee-rules.cfm

III. QUORUMS

1. Six Members of the Committee, actually present, shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of discussing business. Eight Members of the Committee, including at least two Members of the minority, shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting business.

Is there some way to force them to attend? No.
Quote
Response to Tx4obama (Original post)

Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:12 PM

Star Member warrior1 (10,431 posts)

3. Do it without them Please try.

The poor primitives are not happy.  Attempt to project.
Quote
Response to Tx4obama (Original post)

Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:14 PM

Star Member HappyMe (15,864 posts)

4. I'm not surprised.

It's their way of stamping their feet and hollering No! like a 2yr. old. Look at the reaction of your fellow primitives, DUmbass.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Chris_ on November 21, 2013, 03:29:00 PM
Quote
Response to Tx4obama (Original post)
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:14 PM
Star Member HappyMe (15,864 posts)

4. I'm not surprised.

It's their way of stamping their feet and hollering No! like a 2yr. old.
You mean like the Democrats in Madison, WI fleeing to the Illinois border to avoid facing Scott Walker?  I guess two can play that game.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Freeper on November 21, 2013, 03:32:10 PM
You mean like the Democrats in Madison, WI fleeing to the Illinois border to avoid facing Scott Walker?  I guess two can play that game.

Exactly my thought.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: jukin on November 21, 2013, 03:38:34 PM
You mean like the Democrats in Madison, WI fleeing to the Illinois border to avoid facing Scott Walker?  I guess two can play that game.

That's fine and noble. Because......DEMOCRATS!!!

I also think that if no republican votes for the nominee to get out of committee the nominee never goes to the floor for vote. The pederast, Harry Reid played with fire and now he gets burned.

In the mean time another few hundred thousand people lost their health insurance and the train wreck of policy called Obama Care is destroying families.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Rebel on November 21, 2013, 03:51:17 PM
Quote
spanone (74,051 posts)

2. they are shrewd assholes. they hate this President beyond reason.

Yeah, I feel the same way. I'm an asshole and hate that idiot you fools elected. I wouldn't piss down that Marxist asshole's throat if his guts were on fire.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Skul on November 21, 2013, 04:19:32 PM
They lit off.
More demands of force.
More demands that the pederast change to rules to fit their agenda.
Let's see how the primitives like it in maybe a year.  :-)
To quote that one primitive....
Quote
It's their way of stamping their feet and hollering No! like a 2yr. old.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Delmar on November 21, 2013, 05:17:06 PM
Quote
1. fleebagger
Popularized by Michelle Malkin, it refers to a politician that flees their home state to avoid a quorum, and thus stifle legislation from being passed. In the original context, the term referred to Democrats who fled the state of Wisconsin to avoid the passing of a bill that would rescind collective bargaining rights for Wisconsin public sector unions.
"Scores of Fleebagger Democrats are now in hiding in neighboring Illinois, the nation’s sanctuary for political crooks and corruptocrats." -Michelle Malkin, "Fleebaggers" (NRO; 23 Feb 2011)
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fleebaggers

The shoe is on the other foot now, DUmmies.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on November 21, 2013, 05:38:30 PM
What goes around, comes around, DU beyotches.

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: wasp69 on November 21, 2013, 07:28:00 PM
How does it taste, DUmmie bitches?
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: obumazombie on November 21, 2013, 08:27:49 PM
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fleebaggers

The shoe is on the other foot now, DUmmies.

That's awesome stuff Delmar. I'm borrowing it and using it immediately on my other thread.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on November 21, 2013, 09:32:11 PM
Proglodytes; Go nuclear!

Reality: The GOP also has nukes.

Proglodytes; Not fair!
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: diesel driver on November 21, 2013, 10:03:20 PM
You mean like the Democrats in Madison, WI fleeing to the Illinois border to avoid facing Scott Walker?  I guess two can play that game.

Don't forget how the dimrats held up GWB's judicial nominations by demanding a super majority vote to confirm instead of a simple majority.

What goes around, DUmbasses, comes around!   :rotf:
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Chris_ on November 21, 2013, 10:09:42 PM
Don't forget how the dimrats held up GWB's judicial nominations by demanding a super majority vote to confirm instead of a simple majority.

What goes around, DUmbasses, comes around!   :rotf:
Karma.

Quote
Appeals court strikes down ACA contraceptive mandate

A U.S. appeals court in Washington Friday struck down part of the Affordable Care Act, ruling mandated coverage of contraception "trammels" religious freedom.

"The burden on religious exercise does not occur at the point of contraceptive purchase," wrote Judge Janice Rogers Brown, an appointee of former President George W. Bush. "It occurs when a company's owners fill the basket of goods and services that constitute a healthcare plan."
UPI (http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/11/01/Appeals-court-strikes-down-ACA-contraceptive-mandate/UPI-70671383331434/)
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Bad Dog on November 22, 2013, 01:17:38 AM
This would seem like the ideal opportunity for "maverick" McLame and his boy "igor" Graham to reach across the isle and get all bipartisan.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on November 22, 2013, 04:00:10 AM
Proglodytes; Go nuclear!

Reality: The GOP also has nukes.

Proglodytes; Not fair!

Exactly.  The "childish" projection in that thread is breathtaking.  


Quote
they hate this President beyond reason.

Tell me (D)Upe, what is loveable about a thin-skinned, habitual to the point of psychotic, lying Marxist who treats law like it shouldn't apply to him?  Is it reasonable to assume a President is going to follow the law? 

Or, just when it suits you?

 :bird: :bird: :bird:
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Ballygrl on November 22, 2013, 07:52:29 AM
Way to go Republicans! who would've thought they had it in them?
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: I_B_Perky on November 22, 2013, 09:09:52 PM
Personally I think Harry Reid knew this. Say what you want about the asshole... but he ain't stupid. I really think it was more of sop to the dem base to get their base out in the next election.

Then again I could be wrong.

Still think he knows what he is doing. I mean look at it this way... he has got to know his side is gonna get nailed in the next election. Got to. Gotta fire up the base somehow.

Just my 2 cents.  A lot will happen between now and next November. I just hope the GOP can gets some conservative candidates that don't say stupid shit. Best thing any GOP candidate can say about abortion, and they will be asked, is this:

"Our house is on fire. When your house is on fire, you do not worry about social issues. That is for another day. Right now, we have to put the fire out. Next question?"
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Dori on November 22, 2013, 09:27:19 PM
"Our house is on fire. When your house is on fire, you do not worry about social issues. That is for another day. Right now, we have to put the fire out. Next question?"

I couldn't agree more.  We really need to get this country back on a sane financial and constitutional footing. 

I just noticed today, that the debt clock is at 17.8 trillion. We won't even make it to the end of the year when it rolls over to 18.  Seems like during the last fight over the shutdown it had just reached 17, and that was only a few weeks ago.



Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Freeper on November 22, 2013, 09:28:39 PM
I couldn't agree more.  We really need to get this country back on a sane financial and constitutional footing. 

I just noticed today, that the debt clock is at 17.8 trillion. We won't even make it to the end of the year when it rolls over to 18.  Seems like during the last fight over the shutdown it had just reached 17, and that was only a few weeks ago.

It's still Bush's fault!
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Skul on November 22, 2013, 09:34:13 PM
Personally I think Harry Reid knew this. Say what you want about the asshole... but he ain't stupid. I really think it was more of sop to the dem base to get their base out in the next election.

Then again I could be wrong.

Still think he knows what he is doing. I mean look at it this way... he has got to know his side is gonna get nailed in the next election. Got to. Gotta fire up the base somehow.

Just my 2 cents.  A lot will happen between now and next November. I just hope the GOP can gets some conservative candidates that don't say stupid shit. Best thing any GOP candidate can say about abortion, and they will be asked, is this:

"Our house is on fire. When your house is on fire, you do not worry about social issues. That is for another day. Right now, we have to put the fire out. Next question?"
You lost me on the analogy, Perky.  Didn't make any sense.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: FlaGator on November 22, 2013, 10:12:05 PM
I suspect that if you were to ask the libs why it was wrong for republicans to do this but ok for the dems the answer would be "because they're republicans"
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: biersmythe on November 22, 2013, 10:46:45 PM
Yeah, I feel the same way. I'm an asshole and hate that idiot you fools elected. I wouldn't piss down that Marxist asshole's throat if his guts were on fire.

No but I would give him a nice pint of Alcohol.......
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Skul on November 22, 2013, 10:59:15 PM
No but I would give him a nice pint of Alcohol.......
Wait a minute.
What kind, might I ask?
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: biersmythe on November 22, 2013, 11:06:04 PM
Wait a minute.
What kind, might I ask?

For HIM everclear 95 percent!....nice fire envoker.  :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire:
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Skul on November 23, 2013, 12:14:24 AM
For HIM everclear 95 percent!....nice fire envoker.  :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire:
What a waste. Big box stores sell plain methanol.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: biersmythe on November 23, 2013, 12:20:58 AM
What a waste. Big box stores sell plain methanol.


HAHA ok you win!
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Skul on November 23, 2013, 12:22:38 AM
HAHA ok you win!
We all win, in that event.  :)
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: obumazombie on November 23, 2013, 10:45:58 AM
What a waste. Big box stores sell plain methanol.

A little bit of wood alcohol goes a long way.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: I_B_Perky on November 23, 2013, 07:47:10 PM
You lost me on the analogy, Perky.  Didn't make any sense.

Well let me explain it this way Skul... your 13 yr old daughter is knocked up. What to do? Then while discussing it with all parties involved, your house catches on fire. Do you sit there and still discuss what to do about the knocked up daughter or do you get out everone out of the house and worry about the daughter's situation another day?

My 2 cents is this country has got such serious fiscal problems that social issues have to take a back burner. We can worry about abortion, the poor, etc, later. Right now we have to get our national house in order before the country collapses.
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: Skul on November 24, 2013, 05:20:59 AM
Well let me explain it this way Skul... your 13 yr old daughter is knocked up. What to do? Then while discussing it with all parties involved, your house catches on fire. Do you sit there and still discuss what to do about the knocked up daughter or do you get out everone out of the house and worry about the daughter's situation another day?

My 2 cents is this country has got such serious fiscal problems that social issues have to take a back burner. We can worry about abortion, the poor, etc, later. Right now we have to get our national house in order before the country collapses.
When I read it again it was plain as day.  Too many beers before.  :banghead:
Makes perfect sense when sober.  :-)
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: I_B_Perky on November 24, 2013, 05:06:40 PM
When I read it again it was plain as day.  Too many beers before.  :banghead:
Makes perfect sense when sober.  :-)

LOL Skul! I've been known to knock back a few too many myself from time to time... usually every Saturday nite.  O-)
Title: Re: Harry the pederast lit a fire, Repugs piddle on it.
Post by: wasp69 on November 25, 2013, 11:59:33 AM
Best thing any GOP candidate can say about abortion, and they will be asked, is this:

"Our house is on fire. When your house is on fire, you do not worry about social issues. That is for another day. Right now, we have to put the fire out. Next question?"

Reposted from here (http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,81074.msg993831/highlight,obamacare.html#msg993831), because I think it bears repeating.

Quote
So now we need to not only abandon societal issues but the unborn as well?  That projects embarrassment and an unspoken concession that the left is right and always will be about "choice".  No, I'm sorry, that will not happen.  I will not stand before the Almighty and explain why it is I felt it more convenient to abandon His word in our society and willingly walked away from His most innocent of creatures.  I won't do that and neither should anyone else.

You have to fix the societal problem before anything else will work.  I think the one thing that has frustrated the Hell out of me for the past 15 years or so have been the "fiscal conservatives" that seem to have held sway over what conservatives should put out as a message.  They told us that we can't win on social issues, concentrate on money instead, and abandon any type of societal morality to the left.  Well, that's been done, and it got us nowhere.

Anyone who tries to tell me that society and finance are separate issues is a damned fool and one not worth listening to.  By abandoning society to the left, we have allowed societal rot which will now affect us all, left and right, in the financial arena.  You cannot fix money when morality is not a factor - one does affect the other in usually disproportionate manners.

The answer is right in front of us, we just need to have the courage to lay hold of the wheel and push.