The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Tucker on November 19, 2013, 06:44:50 PM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014652539
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 06:33 PM
mc51tc (120 posts)
Supreme Court won’t block Texas abortion restrictions
Source: Dallas Morning News
"WASHINGTON — A divided U.S. Supreme Court refused Tuesday to block new Texas restrictions on abortion clinics.
Planned Parenthood and other groups turned to the high court two weeks ago after losing at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
On Oct. 28, U.S District Judge Lee Yeakel issued an injunction, blocking implementation of the law, which requires abortion providers in Texas to have admitting privileges at a local hospital. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott appealed to the 5th Circuit, which lifted the injunction on Oct. 31. That court will hear the case in January.
In the meantime, more than a dozen clinics across the state have halted abortion services. The procedure is no longer available in about one-third of the state.
Abortion providers turned to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping to have the 5th Circuit ruling overturned.
Justices supporting the ruling wrote here. They argued that those see
“Reasonable minds can perhaps disagree about whether the Court of Appeals should have granted a stay in this case,†they wrote, but those seeking to block the Texas law pending trial fell far short of the required legal standards for the high court to step in. “It would flout core principles of federalism by mandating postponement of a state law without asserting that the law is even probably unconstitutional.“
Four liberal justices dissented. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote: “Although the injunction will ultimately be reinstated if the law is indeed invalid, the harms to the individual women whose rights it restricts while it remains in effect will be permanent.â€
Abortion rights advocates were deeply disappointed."
Read more: http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2013/11/supreme-court-wont-block-texas-abortion-restrictions.html/
Response to mc51tc (Original post)
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 06:48 PM
Star Member grilled onions (1,684 posts)
1. Have They Ever Documented The Non Choice Decisions?
I shudder to think how many of these are born into extreme poverty or perhaps a dangerous situation with a menacing husband/boyfriend. Will these babies have enough food? Is the mother so young that she has little interest in raising another since she's raising hell herself. What about those who fear a certain medical condition for herself or something the baby could inherit?
These dictators of female reproduction never even think beyond what THEY want. Be it something in the name of their religion or just to be able to dominate the female species the main thing is their job is done once the baby is born. That is also when they lose all interest in the future of that new born.
This reply is the reason I brought this over. So far it's the only reply.
I need to ask grilled onions one simple question, you think that not being allowed to live is a better option?
-
I need to ask grilled onions one simple question, you think that not being allowed to live is a better option?
That's a very good question, and one I've often asked.
I'll bet Ms. Ed, the unappellated eohippus, the High Priestess of Moloch to the primitives, is having a cow about this. The bitch lives in Texas.
-
So "what ifs" is a valid reason to kill a baby? And don't we have laws on the books against abusing infants and children who do get to live? And what the hell is "extreme poverty"?
-
Why don't DUmmies embrace giving an unwanted child up for adoption rather than being so eager to embrace murdering it?
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014652539
This reply is the reason I brought this over. So far it's the only reply.
I need to ask grilled onions one simple question, you think that not being allowed to live is a better option?
Tucker, you do realize that you're much more apt to get an intelligent answer by asking actual grilled onions that question instead of the DUmmie known as grilled onions?
-
Grilledbunions, your "life experience" is not everyone elses.
:urmeds:
-
Lets look at this from a purely medical standpoint. The law states that doctors performing abortions (a surgical procedure) must have admitting privileges at a local hospital or they have to close their clinic. How is this law itself in anyway objectionable? Libs are upset that it will "restrict" access to abortions, but it doesn't actually put any limits on abortions, it just says that if a physician is going to perform abortions, they need to have the ability to admit their patient to a hospital in the case of an emergency. Is there any other sort of surgery that any medical professional could perform without the ability to transport their patient to the hospital if something went wrong? Even Midwives have to work with hospitals if they are assisting with a home birth, because something can always go wrong.
DUmmies, do you know how many things can go wrong during a surgery? There is a reason that patients need to sign a consent before receiving anesthesia and before having any sort of surgery performed.
-
So having 20 weeks to decide to murder a baby is not long enough?
-
So having 20 weeks to decide to murder a baby is not long enough?
Must be dealing with very slow learners.
-
So having 20 weeks to decide to murder a baby is not long enough?
Believe it or not, some woman do not know until the baby is by today's standards viable that the baby is viable and in fact are pregnant.
Some of the larger hospitals have post natal units with baby's born at less then a pound. Un freaking believable that we with technology have progressed so far that we can keep alive a baby just over the edge of 6 months gestation. I had a early birth child as did my grandchild, such a awesome experience to watch them grow inside incubators covered with tubes and eyes wrapped to shield them from the unnatural light.
If I had my way in life , I would demand all children male and female to from 3 rd. grade and each year there after until they graduated from high school be required to once a year get suited up and taken into these neo natal units to see for themselves what human life looks like. Then the kids their age outside playing and showing them the results of being kept alive.
Be interesting to have a group of boys playing BASKET BALL AGAINST EACH OTHER WHEN ONE TEAM HAD HAD WATCHED THE OTHER GO FROM LESS THEN A POUND OF BUTTER TO NOW CHALANGING THEM.
Piss me off, we have all this sex education on how to have sex in all forms, but we have no training about the results of sex, or push homosexuality to prevent the males from experience of the most remarkable act on earth---reproduction.
Some States forbid the showing of a sonogram of the baby the mother wants to abort. Why, will the truth change the mothers mind and take away the money the abortionist wants to make on killing the child ???
-
Must be dealing with very slow learners.
Clearly, they voted for King Barky the Liar.....twice.
-
Clearly, they voted for King Barky the Liar.....twice.
Only twice?
Think about that... :whatever: