The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: USA4ME on October 27, 2013, 09:07:36 PM
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v58/laura.harper/deductible_zps0495fa77.jpg)
From this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023933093
She has been saying under Obamacare her premium will be $176.19.
I've told her to inform us just what kind of subsidy she's getting.
If I'm reading this right, her premium should be $369.52, which means she's underpaying by $193.33 x 12 or $2,319.96 a year. Think of how many other moochers are out there that are dependent upon those of us who are intelligent and hard-working enough to provide for ourselves.
A free ride is always better, isn't it Grumpy?
Leech.
.
-
Hmmm... I saw this:
mbperrin (7,308 posts)
4. Great! I spent 22 years self-employed where we had no insurance of any kind.
Last 3 decades, we've been lucky enough to have insurance by teaching.
Oh, and BTW - our premiums next year are unchanged, just like the previous 3 years. I suspect most of the hollering about premium increases on existing plans is just more Fox.
It IS great to be able to get the treatment you need.
OK maybe I got this wrong and I ain't reading it correctly. It says WE have spent 22 years self employed and had no insurance. Then it said we have spent the last 3 decades having insurance by teaching.
22 years + 30 years = 52 years. 18 + 52 = 70.
65 you go on medicare, right? And your premiums are not changed just like the last 3 years?
????
If it was anybody else, I would think they were working past 65. These are dummies though. I guaren-damn-tee you that as soon as they could get on the government tit they did that.
Not to mention the dummie (supposedly) was actually self employed, for 22 years no less, and didn't get a policy?
Sorry mbperrin, your timeline just don't add up.
First of all... 22 years self employed? BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Right. Second of all... then after that you went into teaching? Or was it before? Then that puts the time line a couple 3-4 years out.
So are you telling me that you are 73 and still working?
Liar.
-
Sucks that I have to pay that much more...no wait, it doesn't. Because it went up from $0/no health insurance. Because I will actually be able to walk into a doctor's office again.
Do they seriously think that most Doctors are going to participate in Obamacare? it's going to be like Medicaid with only a limited amount of Doctors.
-
It's even more costly than initially suspected.
She's on another thread I was reading last night (I can't find it right now) saying that 3 years ago a insurance policy would have cost her $1,450/mo or $17,400/yr. That means an insurance company had accessed that given her and her son's risk, they would be paying out at least $14,000/yr on average. Now insurance, on average, is going to be paying out around $12,000/yr more than they are receiving from Grumpy.
And you know who picks up the tab.
.
-
It's even more costly than initially suspected.
She's on another thread I was reading last night (I can't find it right now) saying that 3 years ago a insurance policy would have cost her $1,450/mo or $17,400/yr. That means an insurance company had accessed that given her and her son's risk, they would be paying out at least $14,000/yr on average. Now insurance, on average, is going to be paying out around $12,000/yr more than they are receiving from Grumpy.
And you know who picks up the tab.
.
And the arrogant self absorbed bitch won't feel the least bit thankful for her fellow citizens largess.
-
And the arrogant self absorbed bitch won't feel the least bit thankful for her fellow citizens largess.
You're right. Instead, we get this:
BlueStreak
102. This is what it means to live in a nation.
I'm willing to pay more so that those with fewer resources can have real heath care.
A bunch of liberals getting subsidies telling other liberals getting subsidies they're glad to pay a little more.
.
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v58/laura.harper/deductible_zps0495fa77.jpg)
From this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023933093
She has been saying under Obamacare her premium will be $176.19.
I've told her to inform us just what kind of subsidy she's getting.
If I'm reading this right, her premium should be $369.52, which means she's underpaying by $193.33 x 12 or $2,319.96 a year. Think of how many other moochers are out there that are dependent upon those of us who are intelligent and hard-working enough to provide for ourselves.
A free ride is always better, isn't it Grumpy?
Leech.
.
She's saying it will go UP $176 a month
-
She's saying it will go UP $176 a month
Of course she is given that currently she's paying nothing.
She still fails to mention that given the risk of her and her kid, the policy would have been higher minus the subsidy and would have been much higher given normal risk assessment.
She's a mooch.
.
-
calimary
113. A single line from your post here that blows shit all over the GOP's objections:
"In other words, when people complain that they don’t want to be subsidizing “freeloaders†through Obamacare, they don’t understand that they are already paying for the care of the uninsured." No DUH! That's the whole point. You're already paying for all the so-called "freeloaders," dumb-ass! That's THE reason why we need the Affordable Care Act.
Too stupid for words.
If we were paying for freeloaders to the degree you suggest, wouldn't everybody paying in to help support these freeloaders cause those who already had insurance premiums to go down? Now everyone is supposed to be paying in something, right? Even the freeloaders suppose to be paying something.
And yet premiums are going up 50%+ for way too many people. Never heard of an insurance pool where I've been paying in to cover myself and the excessive cost of freeloaders, only to have more participants in the pool and rates going up. Nope, now that freeloaders are pitching in, premiums should be dropping for those who already had insurance with deductibles staying the same. But they're not.
.
-
All leftists are moochers.
-
mbperrin (7,308 posts)
4. Great! I spent 22 years self-employed where we had no insurance of any kind.
Meaning that mbperrin spent 22 years not having health insurance because he didn't have someone else to pay for it.
-
I'm willing to pay more so that those with fewer resources can have real heath care.
I'm not.
-
I'm willing to pay more so that those with fewer resources can have real heath care.
I'm willing to pay less if it means deadbeat democrats will die.