The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on September 10, 2013, 02:17:20 PM
-
No one can persuade the crazy bald dwarf that it's not a good idea to link to a known virus:
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:01 AM
nadinbrzezinski (125,698 posts)
You want to see a hacked page by the Syrian Web hackers?
Last edited Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:30 PM USA/ET - Edit history (4)
Malicious code PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK
I went to check on an ongoing incident, and walla.
It is full of videos and photos and all Assad is great, and thanks to allies
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023635849
After four hours of DUmp outrage, the nutcase reluctantly deleted the link.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:06 AM
SidDithers (29,066 posts)
1. No thanks...
if they've hacked the page, there's no telling what kind of shit they've embedded into the code.
Probably not a good idea to link to a hacked webpage. A screenshot would have been enough.
But you know best.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:07 AM
NYC_SKP (51,997 posts)
2. I'm getting a malicious code message, Nadin.
I think the hosts will be inclined to lock it unless you kill the link or post a warning.
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #2)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:12 AM
nadinbrzezinski (125,698 posts)
4. Yes, they are doing that in order to hack
Lovely IPad...
They have done this on twitter and to the NYT as well.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:38 AM
HappyMe (14,370 posts)
7. If there is malicious code involved,
please just self-delete.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:41 AM
msanthrope (18,905 posts)
8. It's amazingly bad form to directly link a page you KNOW is full of malicious code.
Please delete.
Response to msanthrope (Reply #8)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:21 PM
SidDithers (29,066 posts)
12. Amazing...
She wouldn't delete the link even after all that.
Simply putting a "malicious code" warning in Bold isn't good enough.
Response to SidDithers (Reply #12)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:25 PM
msanthrope (18,905 posts)
13. And I alerted--wonder where the Hosts are. If someone with only 10 posts had posted
a page with 'malicious code,' I have no doubt it would be blocked. Unequal enforcement isn't cool.
Response to msanthrope (Reply #13)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:27 PM
SidDithers (29,066 posts)
15. Hosts think that because the webpage has gone back to normal...
that it's safe.
That's a big assumption, as far as I'm concerned.
Response to SidDithers (Reply #15)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:30 PM
msanthrope (18,905 posts)
19. Not only is that an assumption that I would characterize as uninformed, it's
not really the point...
Either posting malicious code links is worthy of a block, or it is not. You don't make exceptions because you now think it's safe, and you don't make exceptions because this is a long-time poster. You enforce the rules, equally.
Response to msanthrope (Reply #19)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:32 PM
SidDithers (29,066 posts)
20. It's my experience that the "rules" have never been enforced equally
when this poster is involved.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 10:48 AM
whttevrr (670 posts)
9. You should remove that link
Response to whttevrr (Reply #9)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:12 PM
nadinbrzezinski (125,698 posts)
11. It does have a malicious code warning,
NOW BOLDED
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #11)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:26 PM
msanthrope (18,905 posts)
14. Why not just remove it and use a screen shot???? nt
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #11)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:28 PM
snooper2 (17,941 posts)
17. If you don't know how we can teach you
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:27 PM
Dash87 (2,371 posts)
16. Thanks, Nadine, but could you plz disable the hyperlink.
The less careful *cough cough me* might accidentally click on it and run into malicious scripts.
Also, why did they choose this website? Are they just trying random ones? Interesting.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:51 PM
TroglodyteScholar (4,675 posts)
21. "Walla"
"Voilà "
Response to TroglodyteScholar (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:59 PM
SidDithers (29,066 posts)
22. Now you've done it...
it'll be the iggy list for you. (if you're not already on it )
-
Ungrateful swine. I don't know why she puts up with them. If it weren't for her pictures and such, I would suspect Nads herself was the product of some hackers twisted mind.
-
Walla! :rotf:
.
-
More ingratitude:
Response to TroglodyteScholar (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 03:08 PM
Brother Buzz (8,842 posts)
24. No, the East County Magazine 'Journos' use the Leo Gorcey School of Journalism stylebook
Think horseshoes and hand grenades; 'Walla' is totally in the ballpark.
-
The nerve! The unmitigated gall! How dare they find fault with one of gNads' posts! Iggys will be forthcoming, and well justified.
And Walla!, the offenders are gone.
When a DUmmy reaches their 'iggy' limit, and a new one is added, is the oldest one then shifted back into view - sorta FIFO (first in, first out)?
-
Walla! :rotf:
.
I was doing the same thing when I read that. :lmao:
-
Walla!
It's a consistent nadinism, like "worst".
Some people believe she will someday learn English, but "au cntrainere", it will never happen.
-
It's a consistent nadinism, like "worst".
Some people believe she will someday learn English, but "au cntrainere", it will never happen.
She might be waiting for everyone else to learn 'nadinese'.
-
Hmmmm..... wallduding.....nadin?
I wonder if she posted this at her East County news internet blog gig? If so, her bosses may want to know that their own equipment may have been subject to such malevolent digital activity.... hmmmm???
-
Hmmmm..... wallduding.....nadin?
I wonder if she posted this at her East County news internet blog gig? If so, her bosses may want to know that their own equipment may have been subject to such malevolent digital activity.... hmmmm???
No. nadin is immune from wallduding.
The rules require that the walldudee lose a paying job.
The malicious munchkin isn't paid.
In fact, Crazy Andrea won't even reimburse her fire-chasing gasoline.
-
No. nadin is immune from wallduding.
The rules require that the walldudee lose a paying job.
The malicious munchkin isn't paid.
In fact, Crazy Andrea won't even reimburse her fire-chasing gasoline.
Fair enough. So I guess we have to come up with another term. But the effect is nearly the same. For years, she's lorded over everyone with her uncanny Lois Lane-esque journalistic professionalism and acumen, so anything that would affect that paradigm is essentially the same as walldudery.
On the other hand, playing with viruses and sending them to other primitives through her B.S. girl reporter costume is not something we would lament, either.
-
No. nadin is immune from wallduding.
The rules require that the walldudee lose a paying job.
The malicious munchkin isn't paid.
In fact, Crazy Andrea won't even reimburse her fire-chasing gasoline.
Correction!!
Terrible mistake on my part.
Crazy Andrea runs Old Elm Tree and its fabulously successful online store.
Crazy Miriam Raftery runs East County Magazine and its stable of moonbats.
It's Crazy Miriam who won't pay for the nutcase's Jeep gas, or even a crummy little voice recorder.
I got my Crazies mixed up. Sincere apologies to Crazy Andrea.
-
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #11)
Tue Sep 10, 2013, 02:28 PM
snooper2 (17,941 posts)
17. If you don't know how we can teach you Keerack!!1! :bwah:
To the iggy list for sure. :rotf:
-
So. If we start to see DU members disappear then we can conclude that the CBD was the one that did it. Posting links with known viruses should get you a ban but we all know the DU loves them some El Guapo
-
Makes perfect sense now. :banghead:
In American radio, film, television, and video games, walla is a sound effect imitating the murmur of a crowd in the background. A group of actors brought together in the post-production stage of film production to create this murmur is known as a walla group. According to one story, walla received its name during the early days of radio, when it was discovered that having several people repeat the sound walla in the background was sufficient to mimic the indistinct chatter of a crowd.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walla
-
Walla! :rotf:
Voila!
(http://www.landsat.com/street-map/washington/detail/walla-walla-wa-5375775.gif)
-
Makes perfect sense now. :banghead:
So it's an onomatopoeia! Cool!!
KC
-
Gnads IS malicious code.