The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on July 30, 2013, 03:47:42 PM
-
Star Member dixiegrrrrl (32,293 posts)
Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say
Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant†and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.
The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons†and do not have a “moral right to lifeâ€.
The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.
The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article's authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal societyâ€.
Link to rest of story and to Journal article itself:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9113394/Killing-babies-no-different-from-abortion-experts-say.html
This feels like a false flag story, to me.Note the use of "liberal society" being painted as supporting infanticide.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023374262
Why should the woman's right to choose end when the feet clear the vagina?
Star Member Just Saying (1,359 posts)
10. Thank you
Wow pretty disgusting stuff.
How is it any different than doing it inside the womb?
You think that inside the womb it is fine and dandy, and a sacred right, yet outside the womb it is all of a sudden disgusting.
GlashFordan (136 posts)
16. Yes, they commonly make the argument
That if you allow an elective 3rd trimester abortion then there is no substantive difference from murdering a newborn infant.
There is no difference, except for the location of the blob of cells.
Star Member BainsBane (14,086 posts)
17. What crap
First off, the telegraph is a RW rag. I don't believe a world of this.
You have to get up pretty early in the afternoon to fool jugs.
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023374262
You have to get up pretty early in the afternoon to fool jugs.
You can get up 2 minutes before midnight and still fool jugs. :hammer:
Too bad her brains aren't as developed as her...sweater. :lmao:
-
You can get up 2 minutes before midnight and still fool jugs. :hammer:
Too bad her brains aren't as developed as her...sweater. :lmao:
That was kind of my point. :-)
-
:banghead:
Tis a shame how disturbed much of society is, that something like this would even seriously be pondered or discussed. Yet alone, that we actively engage in the murder of children in utero. :(
-
“fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal societyâ€.....yeah, well I'm also a gun hugging terrorist too......I don't thump my bible, just DUmmie heads.
-
GlashFordan (136 posts)
16. Yes, they commonly make the argument
That if you allow an elective 3rd trimester abortion then there is no substantive difference from murdering a newborn infant.
And the rebuttal is...???
-
And the rebuttal is...???
You bunch of reich-wing morans. It's a baby when we SAY it's a baby. It's a clump of cells otherwise.
Duh.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
-
I can think of 206,456 DUmmies that I wouldn't mind if abortion were retroactively allowed.
-
I can think of 206,456 DUmmies that I wouldn't mind if abortion were retroactively allowed.
I have considered a career as a retroactive abortionist. It's the next logical step after Tiller the baby killer. It's also a basic human right.
-
Response to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)Tue Jul 30, 2013, 04:35 PM
SheilaT (12,809 posts)
14. Read the book
Unwind by Neal Shusterman. It's a YA, but don't let that put you off. Sometime in the future an actual war between pro-life and pro-choice armies is settled by passing a "Bill of Life". It says "human life may not be touched from the moment of conception until the child reaches the age of thirteen. However, between the ages of thirteen ad eighteen, a parent may choose to retroactively "abort" a child." The process in which a child is retroactively aborted is called "unwinding".
A spooky and fascinating read.
Democrat underground hardest hit.
-
Personally, I think this is great. I can now get to perform some 300 trimester abortions.
-
Democrat underground hardest hit.
If the reference is to emotional age, the DUmp would be cleaned out today.
-
Democrats the murder of unborn babies, post crap like the OP in this thread...and yet have the unmitigated GALL to call people like BSS, myself and other veterans here "baby killers"?
:whatever:
-
Notice that none of them attempts to refute the argument.
-
Democrats the murder of unborn babies, post crap like the OP in this thread...and yet have the unmitigated GALL to call people like BSS, myself and other veterans here "baby killers"?
:whatever:
Tx, it's times like this when one has to consider the source of the comments--the DUmp.
Then, distribute the source of the comments far and wide, saying, "This is representative of the Democrat Party of today." Eventually, the dam will break.
-
Tx, it's times like this when one has to consider the source of the comments--the DUmp.
Then, distribute the source of the comments far and wide, saying, "This is representative of the Democrat Party of today." Eventually, the dam will break.
It truly is representative of the evil democrat party. The leadership of the evil democrat party thinks exactly the same, they are just cunning enough not to say it in public. That. Is. The. Only. Difference.
-
Tx, it's times like this when one has to consider the source of the comments--the DUmp.
Then, distribute the source of the comments far and wide, saying, "This is representative of the Democrat Party of today." Eventually, the dam will break.
I send links to some of the more reprehensible stuff from DU out on Twitter and Facebook. I just wish more people followed me to see it.