The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Revolution on July 22, 2013, 04:55:48 AM

Title: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Revolution on July 22, 2013, 04:55:48 AM
Quote
Lil Missy (13,908 posts)

Breaking: The Dutchess Kate is in labor!!!
 
I hope it's a boy! 
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023311803

I couldn't care less one way or the other about this, really. However, I find the hypocrisy of this lone thread both fascinating, and humorous.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: AprilRazz on July 22, 2013, 05:51:43 AM
I am wishing them the best. This new generation of royals seem to be on the right path.

I am also glad there is some new blood in there. They were not known as the most attractive people out there.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: JohnnyReb on July 22, 2013, 08:08:16 AM
MSM is making a big deal about having a baby.....anything to distract the DUmmies from Obama laying eggs.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Rebel on July 22, 2013, 09:22:11 AM
Quote
Chan790 (14,492 posts)
93. To Hell with the Monarchy!

F*ck the monarchists and the entire royal family. Deadbeat lot of them don't do a damn thing and sponge off the public...they should have left the royal tradition to rot with Charles II's head.

I hope she has a gremlin.

Deadbeat? Like the welfare queens you idiots produce on the left?

These people are ghouls.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: thundley4 on July 22, 2013, 10:33:46 AM
Quote
Chan790 (14,492 posts)
93. To Hell with the Monarchy!

F*ck the monarchists and the entire royal family. Deadbeat lot of them don't do a damn thing and sponge off the public...they should have left the royal tradition to rot with Charles II's head.

I hope she has a gremlin.

The Kennedy Dynasty? 

The Royal Family budget is less than the Obama's have been spending. Talk about leeches.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 22, 2013, 11:05:52 AM
Quote
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 02:41 AM
Lil Missy (13,908 posts)

Breaking: The Dutchess Kate is in labor!!!
I hope it's a boy!

No context without date and time.


Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Undies on July 22, 2013, 11:31:40 AM
The Royal Cliump of Cells Commands You!
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Wineslob on July 22, 2013, 01:11:02 PM
Don't care.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: franksolich on July 22, 2013, 02:01:36 PM
No context without date and time.

Heartily seconded, but what can one do?
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: franksolich on July 22, 2013, 02:03:06 PM
The Royal Cliump of Cells Commands You!

I've been waiting breathlessly for several hours now.

My face is turning blue.

How long is it supposed to take infants to be born?
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: GOBUCKS on July 22, 2013, 02:10:53 PM
Quote
Response to byeya (Reply #71)
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:18 AM
Atman (26,336 posts)

80. +237
I thought we fought like hell be rid of these royal douche bags!


Let's just pray the royal infant isn't named "Kaitlyn" or "Dakota".

But seriously, the two most powerful forces in shaping human civilization over the past thousand years have been the Roman Catholic Church and the British Royal Family.

Aside from their tourist value to the UK, and the occasional nut like Prince Charles, the entire world owes the royals a debt of gratitude.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Chris_ on July 22, 2013, 02:12:07 PM
I've been waiting breathlessly for several hours now.

My face is turning blue.

How long is it supposed to take infants to be born?
I've heard of labor lasting 36 hours or more.  I guess the opted not to go with a cesarean.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: BlueStateSaint on July 22, 2013, 02:25:16 PM
I've heard of labor lasting 36 hours or more.  I guess the opted not to go with a cesarean.

So have I, especially with a first-born.  My wife, when The Heiress was born, was in labor a shade over eleven hours.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: franksolich on July 22, 2013, 02:31:43 PM
I've heard of labor lasting 36 hours or more.  I guess the opted not to go with a cesarean.

Yeah, I've heard of long labors, some of them lasting even two days, but those were extraordinary cases.

I suspect however my own family was pretty "average," and it's big enough to be a representative sample.

I have all the baby books, of course, and my parents kept meticulous notes on all of us.

Eight infants, longest labor eight and a half hours, shortest labor twenty-five minutes; that was I, the seventh.

Eight infants, longest delay in scheduled time of birth, eleven days, most premature appearance can't be determined, because my younger brother was delivered by artificial means, and was yanked out five weeks ahead of time.  Only one of the eight arrived exactly on time; that was I.

Eight infants, the "average" weight which was distorted, again with my younger brother who was naturally pretty small, but usually in the seven-pounds-something.  There was one, the late one, who came in at nine and a half pounds.  I guess the ideal weight for an infant is 8 pounds, 2 ounces, and my mother did have one of those.  That was I.

I can't see where the royal family doesn't get just as good pre-natal care as my mother did, but apparently they don't.  It must be due to this "free medical care for all" thing they have over there. 
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: franksolich on July 22, 2013, 02:38:09 PM
It's a boy.

About time.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Aristotelian on July 22, 2013, 03:51:11 PM
The Royal Family budget is less than the Obama's have been spending. Talk about leeches.

I read earlier today that the Obamas cost more than every single monarchy in Europe. I know which side I'd rather have as well.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Aristotelian on July 22, 2013, 03:53:14 PM
Deadbeat? Like the welfare queens you idiots produce on the left?

These people are ghouls.

DUmmies and their 'intellectual' predecessors have been doing their best to kill off monarchies since Charles I and Louis XVI...as an English conservative it's pretty much obligatory to be a monarchist, but looking at the DUmp's hatred for the monarchy reassures me that Britain is best off keeping it for centuries to come.
Title: Re: Abortion Loving Primitives Coo Over Kate's Labor
Post by: Rebel on July 23, 2013, 08:41:50 AM
I read earlier today that the Obamas cost more than every single monarchy in Europe. I know which side I'd rather have as well.

Considering the Royal Family gets, if I'm not mistaken, 50 million per year, that's not far-fetched at all. We just spent 100 million bucks to send this dick and his brood to Africa for vacation and are about to pony up more money to send the f'ers to Martha's Vineyard for yet another vacation. Harry and Edward serving in the military, what the Queen did during WWII, sweating and toiling in the factories for her nation, the DUmbasses can't say a f'n thing about the Royal Family.