The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Texacon on July 11, 2013, 11:37:40 AM

Title: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Texacon on July 11, 2013, 11:37:40 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023223712


Quote

Thu Jul 11, 2013, 09:54 AM

Star Member DainBramaged (38,458 posts)

"Poor guy was defending himself"

Poor guy, you mean Zimmerman?


Yeah, he doesn't deserve this.......


(I cut him off)


"If you knew anything except what you heard from Fox, you'd know that, in spite of the cops TELLING HIM not to pursue the kid eating Skittles, Zimmerman did and caused the confrontation that led to him shooting Travon Martin. Next time you spew shit, have your facts right not Fox wrong". (more or less)



Blank stare and no response.


I walked away from his desk with his co-workers in silence, avoiding the eyes of the resident Liberal. (me)


Douche bag

Wow, ol DB sure told him!

This looks interesting but I can't grab anymore at present. 

KC
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: blitzkrieg_17 on July 11, 2013, 12:03:27 PM
fake
not even worth calling it a bouncy. just fake
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: obumazombie on July 11, 2013, 12:04:07 PM
Yesterday Beckel floated the trial ballon that Trayvon was defending himself from Zimmerman.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: txradioguy on July 11, 2013, 12:21:24 PM
If all I had listened to about this story was what CNN International was putting out when I first heard about this whole incident...I'd sound as stupid and retarded at the Mentally Challenged primitive.

Thankfully I'm not as incurious as he is and did some research on my own.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: USA4ME on July 11, 2013, 12:39:03 PM
Dain is all talk. If he was as tough as he'd like to make himself out to be, he would have heeded the calls to reveal his name, address, and other personal information so that others could confront him in person. Has he? No. Because he's all talk.

.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: movie buff on July 11, 2013, 01:24:28 PM
"in spite of the cops TELLING HIM not to pursue the kid eating Skittles,"
That's NOT what they told him, as I recall. They basically said, "It's unnecessary for you to follow him," not "Stop following him right now!"
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Karin on July 11, 2013, 01:28:21 PM
Besides, Moviebuff, it was the dispatcher who said "we don't need you to do that." 

I waded through all the bullshit to get to the last two posts, which don't end well for Dain.

Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to DainBramaged (Original post)
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 01:01 PM
Chico Man (2,484 posts)
38. This confrontation was at work?

Funny how yesterday I was talking about how many jobs I am hiring for but I'm having a tough time finding people that WOULDN'T create a hostile work environment or are just plain strange.

Nothing against strange people, it's just that I like to avoid having to escort people out of the building for blatant disrespect of others personal space and making work quite uncomfortable for many.

There's a time and place for everything, including divisive politics and name calling.


Quote
Response to Chico Man (Reply #38)
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 01:22 PM
Pelican (649 posts)
42. Agreed...

If it were my employee he would be counseled or canned for being disruptive and difficult to work with.

The very stereotype of the abrasive know-it-all.

 :lmao:
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Chris_ on July 11, 2013, 01:34:22 PM
"in spite of the cops TELLING HIM not to pursue the kid eating Skittles,"
That's NOT what they told him, as I recall. They basically said, "It's unnecessary for you to follow him," not "Stop following him right now!"
That wasn't a cop, it was a 911 dispatcher.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: BlueStateSaint on July 11, 2013, 01:58:07 PM
That wasn't a cop, it was a 911 dispatcher.

Who later admitted under cross-examination that they had zero authority to make such an order.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Tess Anderson on July 11, 2013, 02:07:11 PM
he is such a miserable creature, but I think DB stole this from "reflection":

Quote

Yesterday
 reflection (5,040 posts)


Stupid ass co-worker just yelled down the hall
"WE SHOULD HAVE A VERDICT IN THE TRAYVON TRIAL THIS WEEK" and then snickered.

I yelled back "TRAYVON WAS ALREADY SENTENCED TO DEATH. NOT SURE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. GET TO WORK" and a couple of nervous laughs floated down the hall.

silence, you could almost hear the gears grinding in his head. Then:

"YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT"

I yelled back "WHAT YOU JUST SAID REVEALS A LOT ABOUT YOU. NOW LET'S GET TO WORK BEFORE WE ALL GET FIRED"

silence.

This dude is going to be ecstatic if Zimmerman walks. It'll be like he got a free ice cream cone or something. Jackass.

they are just doing Obama's bidding again.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Chris_ on July 11, 2013, 02:08:19 PM
:bouncy:
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Texacon on July 11, 2013, 03:01:58 PM
 :rotf:

Quote
hfojvt (31,672 posts)

18. where did YOU hear that?

Because that is not known at all.

Zimmerman followed the kid, BEFORE he was told "we don't need you to" (which is not nearly as strong as being told NOT to btw)

and how do you know Zimmerman kept following and that he CAUSED the confrontation.

You don't, but you are quite sure of yourself and angry towards people who do not agree with you.

Did I say people? I meant douchebags.

They aren't really people, are they. Just douchebags. Fox brainwashed douchebags.

and for what it is worth - I don't even have cable TV.



Response to hfojvt (Reply #18)

Thu Jul 11, 2013, 12:51 PM

Star Member DainBramaged (38,465 posts)

31. So you aren't happy how I presented my argument to a factless slob?

Oh ****ing well.



Response to DainBramaged (Reply #31)

Thu Jul 11, 2013, 01:07 PM

hfojvt (31,672 posts)

40. your lack of concern is noted

You are not concerned about your own lack of facts, even while you call HIM a "factless slob". Since you never gave him a chance to say much of anything, how do you know he was not going to present any facts?

Your own rant includes one significant untruth and a whole bunch of conjecture.

To think there was a time DU fancied itself a "reality based community".



Response to hfojvt (Reply #40)

Thu Jul 11, 2013, 01:27 PM

Star Member DainBramaged (38,465 posts)

43. Whatever

My facts are FOREVER more accurate than his will ever be


Thanks for siding with the Left.....

Quote
Yeah, it's gotta be about politics huh Dain?  Can't be handled by the justice system.   :whatever:

Response to DainBramaged (Reply #43)

Thu Jul 11, 2013, 03:11 PM

hfojvt (31,672 posts)

45. I will side

with the truth every time and with kindness every time as well.

I would hope the left is on that side, but if not, I am not gonna embrace untruths and hate.


Response to hfojvt (Reply #45)

Thu Jul 11, 2013, 03:52 PM

Star Member DainBramaged (38,465 posts)

49. So for the sake of arguing, you'll side with the Puke at my work SIMPLY

becuse my 'facts' weren't factual enough for you, in spite of the fact he had NO intelligent knowledge of the case.


Your piety floors me. And being kind to the office jerk off, sorry, you don't work with me.


Have a nice life.

 :lmao:

KC
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: obumazombie on July 11, 2013, 03:04:41 PM
Is there any chance Dain is in a conversation with his own sock puppet ?
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Texacon on July 11, 2013, 03:19:02 PM
Is there any chance Dain is in a conversation with his own sock puppet ?

He's a DUmmie, of course it's possible.

KC
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Wineslob on July 11, 2013, 03:31:58 PM
Poor DUmbass. The "facts" of the trial supersede yours.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: ChuckJ on July 11, 2013, 04:29:28 PM
Which one of the DUmmies is it that huffs paint?
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: 67 Rover on July 11, 2013, 04:32:34 PM
Which one of the DUmmies is it that huffs paint?

Drale.
Title: Re: "Poor guy was defending himself"
Post by: Skul on July 11, 2013, 04:33:56 PM
There are many in there that mention actual facts and testimony in regards to the case.
Poor dain and a few lick-spittles do their best to denigrate them.
A by-line from *jugs*, would really be fun.
I'm surprised she hasn't jumped into this one.