The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on July 10, 2013, 05:56:12 PM
-
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
TX Police Officer Shot and Killed With Assault Rifle By Gun-Dealing Child Molester [View all]
blah-blah-blah
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
47. So having failed so spectacularly in every other debate you now reach for
comparing 80 million people to a homicidal pedophile. This is simply unhinged.
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
64. Thanks to gun folk, I have learned an important lesson
That the right of indicted rapists to bear arms is more important than the right of children to be free from rape or sheriffs to remain alive. Evidently the Second Amendment now means that an indicted gun owners have all weapons necessary to kill and rape whenever he wants. Liberty required that sheriff to die, just as it required Zimmerman to kill Trayvon Martin. Freedom is measured in corpses, which is why America is the freest country in the industrialized West.
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
81. Rapists don't have a right to own guns. They have a right to be shot by one.
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
82. a poster above disagrees
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
83. You'll have to be more specific.
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
84. see
post 48
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
85. Nothing he said detracts from my statement people have a right to use deadly force against rapists.
Last edited Wed Jul 10, 2013, 11:57 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Nor does it distract from the fact you've made a sad attempt to equate all gun owners with cop-killing child molesters because you can't make a qualified argument to support your position.
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
86. Not even close
Last edited Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:02 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)
No where did I do that. I posted a news article you would like to see suppressed. That is entirely your problem.
The other poster's point directly contradicts yours. He argues quite strongly that the indicted rapist should be able to keep his guns. Oh, let me guess. You want the children to have guns too so they can defend themselves from rapists? That didn't work so well for the sheriff, did it? You can hardly argue he wasn't armed.
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
87. Then perhaps you would like to state plainly and unequivocably that
you in no way wish to infer that the actions of the suspect in the OP being a cop killer and child molester are indicative of the general behavior of the 80 million gun owners in the US. If that is not your point than saying as much would be easy -- right?
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
88. He used his gun to kill
Last edited Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:12 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Far too many gun owners do that, but then of course that is what guns are designed for. I see no particular correlation between gun owners and pedophiles or rapists, (other than a gun can come in handy in forcing someone to submit to rape), but nor do I see how owning a gun makes it any less likely a man is a pedophile or a rapist.
It takes an unusual mind to read a news story about one person and assume that is intended to apply to all of a particular group of people. Do you often have that problem?
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
89. Criminals will use whatever they can to further their objectives.
Guns allow their would-be victims to resist them on equal or superior terms. It is the criminal you should be dealing with, not those who would defend themselves. Over 70% of rapes are perpetrated by an unarmed attacker. Less than 5% of rapists employ a gun. That means a woman who chooses to arm herself has a 5% chance of being on equal terms with her attacker and a 95% of possessing superior force.
The diseased criminal in the OP does nothing to convince me that those women ought to be disarmed in some ridiculous charade that pretends the rapists of the world will mysteriously vanish once she has been disarmed.
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
90. I realize that guns are not necessary or even common in rape
They come in handy for killing, however. Criminals, or those with prior felonies, are not the only ones who kill. Toddlers have been fairly prolific of late, and even dogs have discharged guns. Then there are upstanding citizens like George Zimmerman and the other 500 plus CCW holders who have killed. I know of no evidence to suggest that most killers have prior felony convictions, but I welcome data that shows otherwise.
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
91. Is it seriously your contention that any thing that can be misused or abused
that may result in death of an innocent be banned from society?
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
92. Where did I say guns should be banned?
I challenged your argument that all homicides are committed by felons.
There is a difference between regulation and reasonable control and banning.
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
93. Definitionally, anyone committing a homicide is a felon.
Weird.
I'm somewhat skeptical of your use of the term "reasonable." I would think it would be reasonable to focus on factors that reduce a greater number of non-defensive killings (regardless of weapon used), not factors that account for the fewest number of non-defensive killings. I would also consider it reasonable to simultaneously protect the civil and natural rights of as many people as possible. I would consider it reasonable to eschew inconsequential, token political fights. And I would definitely consider it reasonable to only lay blame where blame is due: at the feet of those who commit actual malicious crimes.
BainsBane (12,515 posts)
94. Oh, so you're talking about after the fact of the killing
Not the oft repeated excuse that all gun owners are law abiding.
So what is your solution for the toddlers who kill? The death penalty?
Nuclear Unicorn (7,359 posts)
95. I dream that some day that those who advocate "reasonable" gun control
will actually say something reasonable.
No. Not all gun owners are law-abiding but those who are law-abiding have every right to not be presumed guilty of some future wrongdoing. Why? Because not all gun owners are law-abiding and those who are law-abiding have every right to adequately protect themselves against criminals, armed or otherwise.
Death penalty for toddlers? Seriously? Grow-up. Then discuss things I have actually said. I will not be browbeaten into silence by raving hysterics who have to fabricate nonsense in order to salvage their own shrinking arguments.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023189684
-
Ban pedophiles and gays, problem solved.
-
Ban pedophiles and gays, problem solved.
The Redundant US Department of Redundant Redundancies is working on that.
-
I didn't realize that PhDs came mail order.
Huh. Have to check Amazon.
-
I didn't realize that PhDs came mail order.
Huh. Have to check Amazon.
Cracker Jack's box. :lmao:
-
I didn't realize that PhDs came mail order.
Huh. Have to check Amazon.
Her's was earned spread-eagle with sweaty old rich white men who use "social justice" as a pick-up line with coeds.
-
She tries too hard to be intelligent, and it's just not something of which she is capable.
.
-
She tries too hard to be intelligent, and it's just not something of which she is capable.
.
She's got pompous down to an art, though.
-
90. I realize that guns are not necessary or even common in rape
They come in handy for killing, however. Criminals, or those with prior felonies, are not the only ones who kill. Toddlers have been fairly prolific of late, and even dogs have discharged guns. Then there are upstanding citizens like George Zimmerman and the other 500 plus CCW holders who have killed. I know of no evidence to suggest that most killers have prior felony convictions, but I welcome data that shows otherwise.
Okay - Ill bite.
I'm going to give you the best standing possible, and inflate your "500 Plus" figure to the maximum - 599.
I'm also going to add to that benefit by only using Florida's current CCW figure, not the entire country.
From http://legallyarmed.com/ccw_statistics.htm the number of active CCW permits in Florida as of 05/31/2013 totals 1,090,017
Basic math comes in at 0.055% total. And remember - that figure is inflated to your advantage. So, like the prosecutors in the Zimmerman trial - you damaged your own case with your own evidence.
-
So, like the prosecutors in the Zimmerman trial - you damaged your own case with your own evidence.
Kinda shot herself in the ass, as it were?
-
There's an old axiom that goes, "You can't win an argument with an idiot", because no matter what you say, they just shovel up some more idiocy to obscure the point. It is thus with most DUmmies, especially this one. In fact, the entire gun control crowd over there are supercilious, emotion-laden idiots.
-
PhDD
Then there are upstanding citizens like George Zimmerman and the other 500 plus CCW holders who have killed.
Okay - Ill bite.
I'm going to give you the best standing possible, and inflate your "500 Plus" figure to the maximum - 599.
I'm also going to add to that benefit by only using Florida's current CCW figure, not the entire country.
From http://legallyarmed.com/ccw_statistics.htm the number of active CCW permits in Florida as of 05/31/2013 totals 1,090,017
Basic math comes in at 0.055% total. And remember - that figure is inflated to your advantage. So, like the prosecutors in the Zimmerman trial - you damaged your own case with your own evidence.
PhDD is a silly old twat.
The 599 number makes no distinction between lawfully justified killings (defensive use of a firearm by a licenseholder against a deadly threat) and unlawful killings.
As a statistic, it is meaningless.
-
God, she is so stupid!!!! :mental: She seems to be really obsessed about gun control and get ripped up over it.
-
PhDD is a silly old twat.
The 599 number makes no distinction between lawfully justified killings (defensive use of a firearm by a licenseholder against a deadly threat) and unlawful killings.
As a statistic, it is meaningless.
Worse, if there were a statistically significant percentage of homicides being committed by CCW holders, you could bet the farm that the anti-gun fascists would be buying up every available second of broadcast ad space to crow that figure from the rooftops.
They don't do that, ergo you may also bet the farm that 99.99999% of CCW shoots are as clean as wind driven snow.
-
PhDD is a silly old twat.
The 599 number makes no distinction between lawfully justified killings (defensive use of a firearm by a licenseholder against a deadly threat) and unlawful killings.
As a statistic, it is meaningless.
It absolutely is -
But even if all 599 killings are unlawful -and all of them are in Florida- the statistical percentage is still damn near zero.
-
Worse, if there were a statistically significant percentage of homicides being committed by CCW holders, you could bet the farm that the anti-gun fascists would be buying up every available second of broadcast ad space to crow that figure from the rooftops.
They don't do that, ergo you may also bet the farm that 99.99999% of CCW shoots are as clean as wind driven snow.
Even Zimmerman scored 1 shot=1 kill. :II:
I know it was from 4 inches away, but stats is stats.
-
It absolutely is -
But even if all 599 killings are unlawful -and all of them are in Florida- the statistical percentage is still damn near zero.
Good point.
-
A particularly annoying (and childish) feature of her style is the use of "Oh so...." followed by a goofy strawman. I can't read her stuff.
PhDD, you put me in the mood to go gun shopping.
-
Okay - Ill bite.
I'm going to give you the best standing possible, and inflate your "500 Plus" figure to the maximum - 599.
I'm also going to add to that benefit by only using Florida's current CCW figure, not the entire country.
From http://legallyarmed.com/ccw_statistics.htm the number of active CCW permits in Florida as of 05/31/2013 totals 1,090,017
Basic math comes in at 0.055% total. And remember - that figure is inflated to your advantage. So, like the prosecutors in the Zimmerman trial - you damaged your own case with your own evidence.
Also keep in mind that the actual number cited above of CCW holders in Florida is probably much less as in my case I have a non -resident CCW from Florida even though I have not been there in > 10 years.
BTW Florida has excellent reciprocity with other states so when you add in my Mass, NH, R.I and Maine CCW licenses then I am legal to carry in 32 states.
-
Her's was earned spread-eagle with sweaty old rich white men who use "social justice" as a pick-up line with coeds.
And waving her large, once-attractive tits in their faces.
I'm surprised she didn't hit the alert button over the extremely-accurate but sex-based characterization of 'Hysteric,' though.
-
And waving her large, once-attractive tits in their faces.
I'm surprised she didn't hit the alert button over the extremely-accurate but sex-based characterization of 'Hysteric,' though.
I wish :jugs: :yahoo: would pick up a new cause to obssess over; this is getting rather old and stale.
Maybe natural feeding of infants should get her attention and concern.
-
I didn't realize that PhDs came mail order.
Huh. Have to check Amazon.
Hers is from a matchbook. The other side of the matchbook said "Can You Draw This Bunny?"
-
Hers is from a matchbook. The other side of the matchbook said "Can You Draw This Bunny?"
A filthy sodomite bunny.
-
I wish :jugs: :yahoo: would pick up a new cause to obssess over; this is getting rather old and stale.
Maybe natural feeding of infants should get her attention and concern.
Don't encourage her. :o :lmao: