The Conservative Cave
Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: Freeper on July 05, 2013, 07:44:19 AM
-
Found this on Face Book.
A short time ago while addressing a CEO roundtable and Business Forum in Tanzania, President Barack H. Obama, told reporters and attendees that today’s Tea Party members in the United States very closely fit the U.S. government’s profile for domestic terrorists. - See more at: http://xrepublic.tv/node/4185#sthash.H2rnni2B.dpuf
Hey Mr Preezy, we are not terrorists we were just responding to a youtube video.
Considering this guy has the sole discretion to fire up a drone and ram it up the ass of any "terrorists", this is pretty frightening.
I believe the reason he said this is to help convince the low information voters that the Tea Party deserved the treatment by the IRS and the IRS doing so was them protecting the country.
If the Tea Party is a terrorist organization we are doing a lousy job, we still have a kill rate of zero after 4 years.
-
He's right. Here's proof:
(http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4766104779622125&pid=1.7)
Oh wait. That's occupy....
-
How are Tea Partiers terrorists? Because, they support, the Constitution and all that written is therein? That they truly understand, what Old Glory is, and what she symbolizes? Though I am not a Tea Partier , myself, I still respect and support all of the above...
How does that make Tea partiers, and Conservatives, terrorists??
-
How are Tea Partiers terrorists? Because, they support, the Constitution and all that written is therein? That they truly understand, what Old Glory is, and what she symbolizes? Though I am not a Tea Partier , myself, I still respect and support all of the above...
How does that make Tea partiers, and Conservatives, terrorists??
To be fair, people who stand up to a person with dictator aspirations it is pretty terrifying to that person. So I guess technically anyone who opposes Dear Leader could be called a terrorists since we terrify him. :-)
-
And it was only five short years ago that dissent was the highest form of patriotism.
-
AP reporter Ramona Darlington, who attended the conference asked President Obama to explain what the profile of an American domestic terrorists is? Obama responded by saying, “Typically domestic terrorists in the U.S. are people who cling to obsolete beliefs from the time of the American Revolution. They are conservative Christians, reactionary Republicans and conspiracy theorists many of whom belong to racist hate groups.â€
“Tea Partiers commonly own guns and stock up ammunition and food in anticipation of starting another civil war to overthrow the will of the governing body who represent all of the American people. We are prepared for any contingency and don’t expect to see any kind of large insurrection. Americans are capitalists who are much more interested in seeing America move forward. These terrorists groups are small in size and really present little danger,†the President added.
-
AP reporter Ramona Darlington, who attended the conference asked President Obama to explain what the profile of an American domestic terrorists is? Obama responded by saying, “Typically domestic terrorists in the U.S. are people who cling to obsolete beliefs from the time of the American Revolution. They are conservative Christians, reactionary Republicans and conspiracy theorists many of whom belong to racist hate groups.â€
“Tea Partiers commonly own guns and stock up ammunition and food in anticipation of starting another civil war to overthrow the will of the governing body who represent all of the American people. We are prepared for any contingency and don’t expect to see any kind of large insurrection. Americans are capitalists who are much more interested in seeing America move forward. These terrorists groups are small in size and really present little danger,†the President added.
If 80 million gun owners present little danger......why they always trying to take away our guns?
-
Fire us up some more, why don't you, Preezy?
-
If this is true, this is huge and should be all over the media. If nothing else, at least the Blaze and Brietbart would have it.
Who is the original source for this article and where did they get Obama's exact quotes?
-
*DISCLAIMER: The National Report is an online portal for “citizen journalists”. The views expressed by writers on this site are theirs alone and are not reflective of the fine journalistic and editorial integrity of National Report. Advice given is NOT to be construed as professional. If you are in need of professional help, please consult a professional. National Report is not intended for children under the age of 18.
That’s one disclaimer that should be heeded very carefully: The Associated Press employs no reporter named Ramona Darlington, according to AP spokesman Paul Colford. “Regrettably, this happens from time to time ,” says Colford. “In this particular case, there is no AP reporter named Ramona Darlington, this is not an AP story and as best as I can tell, a few people have been had.”
Those who have seen fit to traffic in the “reporting” of “AP Reporter Ramona Darlington” can be found here and here and here, at least. The “Ramona Darlington” thing has already gone international, says Colford, noting that a blogger in Germany inquired as to whether this story was authentic.
The AP is playing a bit of defense against the story, as Colford has taken to posting rebuttals in comments sections.
New York Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/07/05/obama-terrorists-and-tea-partyers-fantasy-version/)
Hm.
-
Fake but accurate.
-
Fake but accurate.
Close enough for government work.
Didn't Nappy Janet's department say pretty much the same thing?
-
Well crap I usually check out these things more carefully, I saw it on facebook posted by someone who I figured wouldn't have been fooled.
-
Close enough for government work.
Didn't Nappy Janet's department say pretty much the same thing?
Obama may not have said it but you know he was thinking it.
-
Obama may not have said it but you know he was thinking it.
That's what makes it so believable, and parts of it may still be. I have nothing against bloggers or non MSM websites. I think sometimes they do a better job, and we actually get more "real" news than out of the MSM. It's hard sometimes to know what the truth is anymore.
Wasn't it PJ Media that broke the story on memo gate? And Drudge broke the Clinton/Monica story, the Nat'l Inquirer broke the story on John Edwards' love child.