The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Texacon on June 29, 2013, 09:21:56 AM
-
That's it. Mr. Dorkio has spoken and this case is SETTLED! (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023126347)
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 09:57 AM
Star Member MrScorpio (55,844 posts)
What kind of person would think that Zimmerman had the right to...
Last edited Sat Jun 29, 2013, 09:58 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
While armed, walk up to a complete stranger who was doing absolutely NOTHING wrong and initiate a confrontation with that person?
If Travon Martin was left unmolested to walk home, who doesn't think that he would have gotten to his destination without getting into a fight and getting shot?
Who had more to fear, the unarmed person who was being chased or the armed person who was doing the chasing?
There's only one victim here and he's dead.
A person who carried a loaded weapon into a confrontation, that he was the only person who was intent on having, and then shoots that person that he initiated the confrontation with should face the consequences of his actions if he shoots and kills the unarmed person that he confronted.
Even if Zimmerman was on the losing end of a fight, it was a fight that was only STARTED from his actions alone.
Being armed didn't given him the right to avoid getting his ass beat when he started the *******ed fight in the first place.
Other than the lawyers who he's paying, I can't see how anyone can honestly defend any of Zimmerman's actions here.
Yup, there it is in a nutshell folks. If you can't see that you must be blind.
Recursion (26,912 posts)
3. Even when armed, you have a right to talk to people in public
This case can't end soon enough.
burnodo (604 posts)
5. You have a right to talk to people in public?
What law or amendment covers that?
LOL, they're so cute when they try to be smart. Hey, DUmbass ever heard of the 10th amendment or is that one you don't like so you don't pay attention to? Let me give you the text;
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
You see, the founders were smart enough to realize they couldn't (and shouldn't) cover everything SO if it is not covered guess who has the power based on the amendment above.
It's a new fire but it may grow since it's early.
KC
-
MrScorpio
What kind of person would think that Zimmerman had the right to, while armed, walk up to a complete stranger who was doing absolutely NOTHING wrong and initiate a confrontation with that person?
No evidence that Zimmerman initiated a confrontation.
Strawman defeated, boy primitive.
.
-
Facts and evidence are not permitted to dissuade the DUmmies from their appointed rounds.
-
What liberals say: "The police will protect you."
What really happens: The UUSC says the police are under no obligation to protect you.
What Liberals say: "I believe in 2nd amendment rights."
What really happens: You have no right to self defense under liberal rules.
-
I guess if you're packing you better carry "The Maxwell Smart Dome of Silence".
-
This is as good a place to post this as any I suppose.
I watched a clip of the Nancy DisGrace show where one of Zimmerman's friends talked about Zimmerman preventing his (the friend's) house from being robbed while walking his dog. He mentioned that Zimmerman had his pistol with him when he walked the dog. Nancy went after that wondering why in the world he'd have a gun while walking his dog.
She knows that one of the reasons for owning a gun is for personal protection. As a former prosecutor she also knows that the bad guys will not give you a pass just because you're walking a dog.
I saw another show (not Nancy DisGrace) where the friend mentioned that the neighbor had suffered several robberies and the perpetrators had been young, black males. For this he was labeled a racist and a member of the Klan.
This intellectual dishonesty really irks me.
I'm beginning to think that it is not just a coincidence that "liberal", "left" and "liar" all begin with the letter L.
-
She knows that one of the reasons for owning a gun is for personal protection. As a former prosecutor she also knows that the bad guys will not give you a pass just because you're walking a dog.
I'd lay dollars to doughnuts that Nancy has a CCW.
KC
-
I would argue that it would be the First Amendment.
What amendment in the Constitution makes it illegal to be offended?
**** off you stupid DUchebag.
-
That's the world they live in. They form a preconceived notion based on their own prejudices and political desires, build a narrative around it, repeat it over and over until it becomes "fact" in their minds, slap a coat of quick-dry varnish on it and pronounce it gospel. And no amount of reasoning or evidence to the contrary this side of Hell is going to dissuade them. They'll use every psychological defense mechanism in the book to prevent their little fantasy from crumbling, so emotionally invested in it they are. We see it to one degree or another over there every day.
Take for instance the meme that "the police ordered Zimmerman not to follow Martin". It doesn't matter how many times they are corrected, the correct quotes provided, the call transcript linked to, etc., in the very next post you'll see someone state it again, as if they didn't even see the evidence to the contrary posted there and in a hundred other threads. It's the same thing as in the Duke rape case. There was practically zero objectivity. It wouldn't surprise me if there were DUmmies that stayed in bed for days in a darkened room sucking their thumbs after the truth of that one came out, so fragile are their psyches.
-
Creepy ass crackers have no rights.
-
The pineapple-headed DUmmy doesn't read cursive.
-
Well, Dorkio, if I'm armed and you jump on me...no matter why, your face is getting blown through the back of your ugly head. Only crime would be your stupidity.
-
burnodo (604 posts)
5. You have a right to talk to people in public?
What law or amendment covers that?
This is what allows us to shoot bums and pan-handlers.
-
No evidence that Zimmerman initiated a confrontation.
Strawman defeated, boy primitive.
.
Oh now, Dorkio probably drank some organic pineapple juice. While it makes the she-male-human-cat hybrid remote view, it makes pineapple-heads see into the past.
-
Hi5 to Jukin.
-
What kind of person would think that Zimmerman had the right to...
(http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i475/Delmar59/this-guy_zps7523d204.jpg) (http://s1095.photobucket.com/user/Delmar59/media/this-guy_zps7523d204.jpg.html)
-
Star Member MrScorpio (55,844 posts)
What kind of person would think that Zimmerman had the right to...
Last edited Sat Jun 29, 2013, 09:58 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
While armed, walk up to a complete stranger who was doing absolutely NOTHING wrong and initiate a confrontation with that person?
Just about everyone in my neighborhood if they didn't know the person. See dickhead, here in West by God Virginia we don't take kindly to strangers walking around... especially after dark. You ain't from around here, someone will ask you why you are here. You wanna be a billy bad ass? You gonna be a billy dead ass.
That's why we got a really low crime rate.
And following someone is not a confrontation. The hoodlum wasn't in the hood anymore, sucks to be him. And it has not been established who initiated the contact.
Next question, dumbass?