Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:30 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
And big Eddie is making this about Snowden
Well time to turn the tv off.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:32 PM
Skidmore (29,289 posts)
2. It is about Snowden.
He made a choice to collect and disseminate information about the NSA and who knows what else. How can it not be about him? He put himself at the eye of a storm.
Response to Skidmore (Reply #2)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:34 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
5. Nope and if you don't get it at this point
I can't help you.
So have a good day.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #5)Her intention is to get it.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:01 PM
MjolnirTime (1,462 posts)
43. You're intention is not to help, is it?
Response to MjolnirTime (Reply #43)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:03 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
44. We have had many posts explaining why
At this point it's willful
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:35 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
6. Yup
He's scared of the mean terrorists under his bed
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:37 PM
sad-cafe (779 posts)
13. but I don't understand
your last 5 OPs have been about Snowden (which I stayed clear of)
why can't Ed Shultz talk about it?
Response to sad-cafe (Reply #22)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 06:10 PM
hrmjustin (10,729 posts)
33. If you don't like the OP you can always put her on ignore.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:39 PM
Tx4obama (30,063 posts)
14. It will continue to be about Snowden until he turns himself in or is arrested & brought back to USA
Snowden is a narcissistic spot-light-loving criminal.
Response to jazzimov (Reply #41)Nadin gets it.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 06:57 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
42. At this point you either get it, or you don't
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #42)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:03 PM
MjolnirTime (1,462 posts)
45. you've been duped, and you're too stubborn to admit it.
Snowden can do no wrong in your eyes.
Response to MjolnirTime (Reply #45)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:07 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
47. It's not about Snowden. Hell, it is not about the other footnote in history
Either (that be Greenwalk). Hell, even Reuters gets it.
It is so much more beyond those two...and about the Constitution too.
I will repeat this, you either get it, or you don't
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #47)I think fifty is a conservative estimate.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:12 PM
Tx4obama (30,063 posts)
50. Of course it is about Snowden otherwise you wouldn't have posted 50 OPs about him. n/t
Response to Skidmore (Reply #54)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:23 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
56. Some do get it, some do not
Even Reuters gets it.
Response to Skidmore (Reply #57)I think nadin could give this answer to any normal person on any subject.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:29 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
58. Independent from this issue
This will be my last response to you on this matter. I think we are simply done. What separates us is not a stream, or an ocean, but galactic distances.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #58)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:34 PM
Skidmore (29,289 posts)
60. I think you are wrong about this.
Response to Skidmore (Reply #60)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:38 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
64. And that is your opinion
And you are entitled to it. For the record I think you are dead wrong too...history and police states are a record we have still available. You can chose to learn from it, or not.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:36 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
62. Hmm you either get it or not
Reuters does
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #62)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:41 PM
ProdigalJunkMail (10,154 posts)
69. you either get it or you don't you either get it or you don't
you either get it or you don't you either get it or you don't you sound like a ****ing parrot. you've written that about 30 times in this thread alone.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #62)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:41 PM
ProdigalJunkMail (10,154 posts)
69. you either get it or you don't you either get it or you don't
you either get it or you don't you either get it or you don't you sound like a ****ing parrot. you've written that about 30 times in this thread alone.
When it comes to gettin' it, gNads is a gettin' it machine.Get what?! Oh noes! I'm on the iggy list!
Get it?
I just wish I knew what this "it" is, where I can find "it," how much "it" costs, and whether i can get "it."
Response to Skidmore (Reply #57)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:29 PM
nadinbrzezinski (122,136 posts)
58. Independent from this issue
This will be my last response to you on this matter. I think we are simply done. What separates us is not a stream, or an ocean, but galactic distances.
I just wish I knew what this "it" is, where I can find "it," how much "it" costs, and whether i can get "it."
If you have to ask, you can't afford "it".
Skidmore (29,289 posts)
2. It is about Snowden.
He made a choice to collect and disseminate information about the NSA and who knows what else. How can it not be about him? He put himself at the eye of a storm.
Bradley Manning sold national secrets that entailed our collection of data on terrorists, and you ****ing retards called him a hero. Snowden revealed to the American people that WE were being spied on, and you call him a traitor.They're both clearly traitors.
They're both clearly traitors.
Just look at ALLLLL the shit that's come out. IRS targeting conservatives. IRS giving confidential PII to liberal organizations. Domestic wiretaps that have not a damn thing to do with terrorists. Collection of "meta data", and I seriously doubt that was the extent, for the purpose of what exactly? Talk of drones being used, well, actually, they're already being used to spy on Americans. Just read about all the LEO's out there admitting to it.
There was once a great experiment known as America. THIS.IS.NOT.IT.
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree. How about this scenario. The government is running a top secret program testing chemical agents on it's own citizens. An employee doesn't think it's right, but he's bound by his security clearance. Seeing as how this is unconstitutional as hell, any protest by him could have disastrous consequences. He goes public and goes into hiding. Is he a traitor for revealing a program "the government" deemed "top secret"? And no, this doesn't have a thing to do with chem-trails. I'm talking about things like the Tuskegee experiment, and no, not the one that involved planes. When our own government is violating their oath of office and targeting it's own citizens, AKA it's EMPLOYERS, I think it's imperative that it come out and be investigated.
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree. How about this scenario. The government is running a top secret program testing chemical agents on it's own citizens. An employee doesn't think it's right, but he's bound by his security clearance. Seeing as how this is unconstitutional as hell, any protest by him could have disastrous consequences. He goes public and goes into hiding. Is he a traitor for revealing a program "the government" deemed "top secret"? And no, this doesn't have a thing to do with chem-trails. I'm talking about things like the Tuskegee experiment, and no, not the one that involved planes. When our own government is violating their oath of office and targeting it's own citizens, AKA it's EMPLOYERS, I think it's imperative that it come out and be investigated.
Bruce Campbell is da man...
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af1OxkFOK18[/youtube]
Response to Skidmore (Reply #3)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:35 AM
nadinbrzezinski (122,277 posts)
4. You know, I think it's time to send you to the ignore list
Have a good life.
*plonk*
Response to snooper2 (Reply #8)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:52 AM
nadinbrzezinski (122,276 posts)
10. You have been so wrong on this
So I guess it is time to say our good byes. *plonk*
I am really tired of the shit
:rotf:
Response to arely staircase (Reply #17)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:59 AM
nadinbrzezinski (122,276 posts)
20. Good bye
I like to deal with the facts on the ground...not your Natasha and Rockies Cold War bad imitation.
And free hint, we are not free either.
*plonk*
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023091335
I think nadin has a new catchphrase:
:rotf:
I like to deal with the facts on the ground...not your Natasha and Rockies Cold War bad imitation.
That's Natasha and BORIS, you nimrod!Yeah, Bullwinkle and Rocky were the GOOD guys !
Response to snooper2 (Reply #8)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:52 AM
nadinbrzezinski (122,286 posts)
10. You have been so wrong on this
So I guess it is time to say our good byes. *plonk*
I am really tired of the shit
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #10)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 11:58 AM
snooper2 (16,988 posts)
18. At least I don't think the government is watching us through our TV
PLONK!
Yeah, Bullwinkle and Rocky were the GOOD guys !
Plonk is the sound of a Nad post hitting the toilet water where it belongs.
Why is it the more I read of her, and the more I watch Big Bang Theory, that nads is just a not-funny version of Mrs. Wolowitz?That's pretty scary. But then she did get someone to marry her. Poor bastard probably puts up with all kinds of shit.
That's pretty scary. But then she did get someone to marry her. Poor bastard probably puts up with all kinds of shit.
Time to make a few phone calls around Pearl and SD. IIRC, he's as nutty as she is.He's either crazy or he's Forrest Gump.
He's either crazy or he's Forrest Gump.
He's either crazy or he's Forrest Gump.Nah, he's got brain damage. Oxygen deprivation.
Nah, he's got brain damage. Oxygen deprivation.
He was on a long submerged cruise with a defective O2 sensor.
It's the only explanation that makes sense.
To serve as quartermaster on a nuclear submarine, he had to at one time have been normal.
Now he's as loony as nadin.
It wouldn't surprise me if everyone who was on that boat has gone as crazy as Abbott.
That's pretty scary. But then she did get someone to marry her. Poor bastard probably puts up with all kinds of shit.I have always wondered if theirs was a green card wedding.
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag72/conscave/pwonk11_zps98b80823.jpg)
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag72/conscave/pwonk11_zps98b80823.jpg)
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag72/conscave/plonkmao_zps88cdf097.jpg)
Hey Nads -
'Occupy' supports Snowden. The Obama administration doesn't.
..What to do, what to do......
If I recall, not all DUmmies supported Occupy. The Occupy crowd is younger, while DUmmies are older.