The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on June 16, 2013, 09:08:52 PM
-
kentuck (66,778 posts)
In a democracy, do not elected officials have a right to keep secrets from the people?
Under what circumstances would it be OK not to tell the people if they are under threat from some external source? Why is it OK for just a handful of people to have these secrets? What is the end result if the people don't know the secrets of the few? Who is pulling the strings in this puppet show?
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023029970
Just ask yourself what if this was happening under a Romney administration.
-
If you are pointing to the hypocrisy of the lib/dem/socialists you have company...
It's So Delicious When A Lib Roundly Criticizes Other Libs... (http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/06/16/greenwald-slams-media-backing-obamas-domestic-surveillance-when-they)
-
Ignorance is strength.
Peace is war.
Transparency is opaqueness.
BTW, the chocolate ration just got increased from 30 grams to 25.
We don't call them DUmb for nothing.
-
Ignorance is strength.
Peace is war.
Transparency is opaqueness.
BTW, the chocolate ration just got increased from 30 grams to 25.
We don't call them DUmb for nothing.
DUmmies.....naturally stupid and selectively ignorant.
-
We don't call them DUmb for nothing.
You said it.
DUmmy ken tuckunder is working hard on a DOTY nomination. Too hard, I think.
kentuck (66,778 posts)
In a democracy, do not elected officials have a right to keep secrets from the people?
Only a DUmpmonkey would believe a citizen gains rights as a result of being elected to office.
ken tuckunder begs to be ruled, not governed.