The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on May 27, 2013, 09:56:04 AM
-
Omaha Steve (35,885 posts)
Anti-Muslim actions rise in UK over slain soldier
Steve just does a cut and paste. No comments from the Steve-oh.
BUT- as you knew they would, DU blames the West and Colonial oppression... in the fourth reply. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014493084
facismrising (8 posts)
4. This is going to be a cyclical continuous problem.
When a regions is continually invaded and plundered(as the middle east has been since the rise of Catholic Europe, followed by the discovery of oil and occupation by France, England and now America) the people of that region are going to radicalize against the occupiers.
The west could easily end this by repaying the Middle Eastern nations for the value of the plunder taken since ancient times, then set up a sustainable energy infrastructure in their own nations so they are no longer dependant on Middle Eastern oil to cheaply power their economies.
In the western economies there are many intellectuals calling for such actions. Men such as Michael Parenti, Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, John Perkins, Howard Zinn etc. have all written on the subject, and many others pertaining to the effects of occupation and war on native populations.
Movements such as Occupy, Zeitgeist, The Venus Project advocate economic security, environmental sustainability and energy independence.
Ridding ourselves of Dependance on Middle Eastern oil is an absolute necessity to guarantee the safety of our nation both economically and from a security stance.
Catholic Europe has been around since the 4th century, DUmbass. Yes, Not mentioning that there was NOTHING to plunder in the POS part of teh world till oil was found. Oh, yeah- and we pay them for that. ****-stick.
obama4socialism (4 posts)
6. Of course it is completely alright for the west to indiscriminately kill Middle Easterners and wage
Last edited Sun May 26, 2013, 04:27 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
economic and other forms of warfare against defenseless nations simply because you require CHEAP ACCESS TO THEIR OIL?
You, like many westerners, seem to hold the opinion that it is only alright to fight to protect your sovereignty if you're of European descent.
No wonder the richest nations in the world voted against or abstained from U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_on_the_Rights_of_Indigenous_Peoples#Criticism
:thatsright: I can't get too mad at this DUmpmonkie. He's a mole.
Of course, the US has more oil in it's own territory than the ME, if the government would let us drill for it we would be free of the ME problem.
JOHNNY ENGLISH (1 post)
14. EVERYBODY INVOLVED IS WRONG.
We shouldn't be in the middle east,we have **** all business there, I agree they should come out of there save british tax payers millions, I think the big problem are the agitators,like chaudhry,the mans an idiot,if he thinks the "English" will bow to his laws he is a fool ,and if hes still confident then crack on! eventually he will be on a plane back to his own country,can only take so much of this horse shit before something has to be done.And why do young muslim males give you dirty looks in the street? strange,and dangerous.As another guy has already said on here,pissing off the british is a really bad move.dont do it. I have muslim friends and they agree the gobshytes trying to take over in the u.k are just a joke its never gonna happen. As for the young guy they killed in Woolwich ,two against one,they had to run him over to make sure the odds stayed with them,who knows,if they had faced him as men,maybe he might have kicked **** out of the pair of them,in the end, a female police officer takes them down! .If you cause trouble in London or anywhere else in the u.k prepare to reap the whirlwind of OUR LAW ! remember as the old song says,there will always be an England..ruled by the English .if you don't like it,you know where the airport is..
another mole. soon to be dead...
obama4socialism (4 posts)
19. No people don't have a right to be upset!?!? The same scene plays out daily
in countries where there is oil to harvest! The same events daily are inflicted upon innocents through the propagation of radicalism and hatred which is FUNDED by rich western nations that refine and extract tons of oil, and require cheap compliant access to maintain MASSIVE PROFITS.
We use warfare to squash state owned ventures to saying we are freeing people from DICTATORS, all while we maintain wonderful relations with other dictators and monarchies that prop up the petrodollar system.
The people that the bombs are getting dropped on don't care anything about this. They hate us, and rightfully so. THEY ARE BEING TERRORIZED EVERYDAY TO MAINTAIN THE WESTERN WORLDS CHEAPNESS.
If we REALLY want to enjoy SAFETY we need to remove our troops from any and all foreign territories and worry about our own wastelands of unemployment, underpaid and undereducated at home.
DUmbass thinks that American Soldiers run people over and cut their heads off in Afghanistan every single day!
jessie04 (276 posts)
12. No one can be that surprised.
One isolated incident and now they want to harass the entire Muslim population. Why do they want to offend them ?
I'm against this attack but we have to look deeper into the situation. They want to live under sharia law and have their own land in and now the UK. offends them.
Remember 7/7 ?
I mean.....It's bigoted to criticize his religion, right .
Ft Hood was one isolated event. So was Paris. So was Boston. So was....
Franker65 (257 posts)
20. Two nutcases, normal muslims shouldn't take the blame
Seems like a random act if you ask me. As sad as it was, there is no need for a backlash against the entire muslim population.
I almost hope the mussies win, just so I can see them murder all the leftists, gays and perverts.
-
jessie04 (276 posts)
12. No one can be that surprised.
One isolated incident and now they want to harass the entire Muslim population. Why do they want to offend them ?
Franker65 (257 posts)
20. Two nutcases, normal muslims shouldn't take the blame
Seems like a random act if you ask me. As sad as it was, there is no need for a backlash against the entire muslim population.
The gruesome murder yesterday of a soldier outside London by a Muslim convert, Michael Adebolajo, brings to mind that throat slitting and beheading are Islamically sanctioned forms of execution. Although these occur particularly often in the course of family-related crimes – think, for example, of the case of Aasiya Hassan in suburban Buffalo, N.Y., killed by her husband in 2009, stabbed with two hunting knives more than forty times in the face, back and chest, then beheaded – this monstrous form of violence is also used in non-family instances. Some of those that took place over the past decade in the West in chronological order include:
•Ariel Sellouk – Houston, August 2003: throat slit attempted but incomplete beheading.
•Sébastien Selam – Paris, November 2003: throat was slit twice; his face was mutilated with a carving fork and his eyes were gouged out by a Muslim neighbor who boasted "I killed my Jew, I'll go to paradise."
•Theo Van Gogh – Amsterdam, November 2004: shot, throat slit, and five-page paper pinned to his body.
•Hossam Armanious, Amal Garas, Sylvia Armanious, and Monica Armanious, – Jersey City, N.J., January 2005: necks, throats and bodies stabbed, mutilation of Coptic tattoo. (A non-Muslim was found guilty of this crime; I do not accept that verdict.)
•Brendan Mess, Erik Weissman, and Raphael Teken - Waltham, Massachusetts, September 2011: throats slit, probably by Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bombers.
•Hany F. Tawadros and Amgad A. Konds – Jersey City, N.J., February 2013: shot, decapitated, hands severed.
•Lee Rigby – Woolwich, England, May 2013: run over by car, mutilated, beheaded.
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2013/05/muslim-acts-of-beheading-in-the-west
-
The west could easily end this by repaying the Middle Eastern nations for the value of the plunder taken since ancient times, then set up a sustainable energy infrastructure in their own nations so they are no longer dependant on Middle Eastern oil to cheaply power their economies.
Hey you idiot....how far back do you want to take this little plan? To the Roman Empire?
Without oil, just how profitable would the desert dwellers have been through the past century? It's not like their religion has allowed them and their victims much progress for the past century and a half.
Your such a miserable collection of unthinking oxygen wasters.
-
I can get behind the DUmmies point of getting off ME oil and telling them "**** you, and the donkey you... well, **** you, you're already ****ing the donkey."
My plan for that is a little closer to Dutch's though, aka drill for what we have here while developing replacement technologies.
-
When a regions is continually invaded and plundered(as the middle east has been since the rise of Catholic Europe)
The Crusades were a response to Muslim aggression.
Face the facts, Muslims are always at war with someone, there comes a point where people on the left need to start pointing a finger at the problem.
-
The Crusades were a response to Muslim agression.
Face the fact, Muslims are always at war with someone, there comes a point where people on the left need to start pointing a finger at the problem.
When it comes to aggression, history begins with the crusades, nothing before that matters to the DUmmies.
-
Franker65 (257 posts)
20. Two nutcases, normal muslims shouldn't take the blame
Seems like a random act if you ask me. As sad as it was, there is no need for a backlash against the entire muslim population.
Just a few weeks ago almost all of the DUmp was demanding the incarceration of all conservatives over the baseless speculation that the Boston bombing was RW.
-
The Crusades were a response to Muslim aggression.
Face the facts, Muslims are always at war with someone, there comes a point where people on the left need to start pointing a finger at the problem.
And when they aren't at war with "infidels", they're at war with each other. Sunni vs. Shia, anyone?
-
And when they aren't at war with "infidels", they're at war with each other. Sunni vs. Shia, anyone?
Brings to mind the problems in America when Europe found her. The indigenous people clung to their old ways refused to make treaty's with each other for the common good. Instead of uniting together they still waged war on each other for slaves, hunting grounds and goods. Tribes were afraid of each other and tried to fight against the Europens on their own. The French came in and gave them weapons and goodies they could not make for themselves to wage war on the English. It was the French that gave bounty's for scalps originally.
The Muslims are much like this, they still war against each other and side with those that can get them weapons and goodies. If history repeats, the Muslims are now at each others throats and will destroy their own culture.
Hang in there, we will have riots and blood shed, thousands will be killed, but in the end the Muslims will loose and those non Muslims will come out of their hide hole to rebuild the world.
-
The Muslims are much like this, they still war against each other and side with those that can get them weapons and goodies. If history repeats, the Muslims are now at each others throats and will destroy their own culture.
They have a saying in the ME: "Me and my brother against my cousin, me and my cousin against the world."
-
I know I shouldn't be amazed, but I am.
I guess conquista and reconquista are terms with no meanings to the DUmmies. Ditto for the siege of Vienna.
Oddly enough, the Dhimmi's claim that an a somebody was robbed. looted, and enslaved by a poorer culture seems to have been right in one instance. What the Muslims did to India was inexcusable, and still is.
-
jessie04 (276 posts)
12. No one can be that surprised.
One isolated incident and now they want to harass the entire Muslim population. Why do they want to offend them ?
Well dummie... how about we play a little game? This game is called name the sides in all armed conflicts around the world. Now dummie... let me let you in on a little secret. In about 90 percent of the armed conflicts going on in the world, the muzzies are on at least one side of it.... if not both!
Now dummie... I know logic is not your strong suit, but to any reasonable person, with an IQ above 80, that would say that this is not an "isolated incident".
Stupid dummie. Really stupid dummie.
Now lets go off on a tangent here dummie. I want you to think for a minute you idiot. Use your one brain cell and think. If the muzzies take over the world, do you really think they are going to be tolerant of you? If the answer is yes, then I suggest you go to Iran and speak truth to power.
-
I can get behind the DUmmies point of getting off ME oil and telling them "**** you, and the donkey you... well, **** you, you're already ****ing the donkey."
Actually Doc... I think it is camels, not donkeys. :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:
:-)
-
Paris Muslim Prayed Before Stabbing French Soldier in the Neck (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/paris-muslim-prayed-before-stabbing-french-soldier-in-neck/)
Yeah, they're just misunderstood. ::)
-
I guess that now Steve can't stir the shit up at the old water treatment plant he has to do it on DU. Sucks to be him.
-
Actually Doc... I think it is camels, not donkeys. :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:
:-)
No quadruped is safe!
:sheep: :sheep: :sheep:
-
No quadruped is safe!
:sheep: :sheep: :sheep:
Dogs, too.
(Watch your 6!)
-
No quadruped is safe!
:sheep: :sheep: :sheep:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
H5 Big Dog. You made me laugh!!!
-
Dogs, too.
(Watch your 6!)
:lol: :lol: :lol:
H5 DD!! That one made me spit my beer all over my monitor.
-
If muslim terrorists formed a union, Steve would be all over it. He would be in love.
-
If muslim terrorists formed a union, Steve would be all over it. He would be in love.
Right up to the time they cut his head off.
-
Dogs, too.
(Watch your 6!)
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Hi5!