The Conservative Cave
Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: ironhorsedriver on May 23, 2013, 05:49:20 PM
-
Obama has ordered Holder to investigate Holder. And you know he will get to the bottom of this.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/obama-orders-doj-review-of-leak-investigations/
-
“Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs,†President Obama said. “Our focus must be on those who break the law.â€
he continued, "I am therefore issuing an Executive Order today that will make pissing me off against the law."
-
I'm sure 0bama has the pen ready to sign the executive privilege order.
-
Mr. Holder will be only objective im sure and will place himself in jail if he did anything massively illegal.
jctejas
-
FoldemHolder's probably already recused himself from everything.
-
Obama comes off as a dufus. Who is pulling his strings? Jarrett? I bet she wipes his butt too.
-
What could possibly go wrong with that? ...from Holder's perspective, anyway...
:whatever:
-
What could possibly go wrong with that? ...from Holder's perspective, anyway...
:whatever:
He's such an idiot he just might slip up and convene a grand jury to investigate himself.
-
I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you that y'all could think there might be a conflict of interest here, when a noted Constitutional scholar like Dear Leader saw nothing of the sort as he gave the assignment to the AG. [/sarc]
-
I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you that y'all could think there might be a conflict of interest here, when a noted Constitutional scholar soil-er like Dear Leader saw nothing of the sort as he gave the assignment to the AG. [/sarc]
-
Holder is getting deeper and deeper into the Rosen/FOX spying scandal.
He not only discussed it with his staff, he signed the search warrant himself.
Now this;
Holder Went Judge Shopping To Obtain Fox News Subpoena (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/05/28/Holder-Went-Court-Hopping-Until-Finally-Getting-His-Fox-News-Subpoena)
He had to go through three Judges to find one to do his bidding. :mad:
-
Holder is getting deeper and deeper into the Rosen/FOX spying scandal.
He not only discussed it with his staff, he signed the search warrant himself.
Now this;
Holder Went Judge Shopping To Obtain Fox News Subpoena (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/05/28/Holder-Went-Court-Hopping-Until-Finally-Getting-His-Fox-News-Subpoena)
He had to go through three Judges to find one to do his bidding. :mad:
And Brit Humes tore Juan Williams a new asshole when Williams had the temerity of defending the schmuck.
http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/05/brit-humes-smack-down-of-juan-williams-over-eric-holder-and-the-james-rosen-case-2651356.html
-
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v675/thundley4/holderholdingholderresponsible_zps31cb986a.jpg)
-
An Executive Order is only for the president, I believe.
-
Ummm, isn't Eric Holder investigating Eric Holder somewhat redundant?
-
Ummm, isn't Eric Holder investigating Eric Holder somewhat redundant?
No, but Eric Holder arresting Eric Holder, who was then released by Eric Holder because Eric Holder didn't Mirandize Eric Holder before Eric Holder was questioned by Eric Holder can get pretty hard to keep track of without a scorecard.
-
No, but Eric Holder arresting Eric Holder, who was then released by Eric Holder because Eric Holder didn't Mirandize Eric Holder before Eric Holder was questioned by Eric Holder can get pretty hard to keep track of without a scorecard.
Or a flowchart.
-
"I have investigated myself and found that I am completely innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt", Eric Holder.
-
The most interesting aspect of AG Holder's judge shopping is the complaint itself; did they 'ante up' the charges to the to get judge#3 to issue?
-
The most interesting aspect of AG Holder's judge shopping is the complaint itself; did they 'ante up' the charges to the to get judge#3 to issue?
Probably a lot simpler than that. $5K might be enough to convince a leftie judge anyway to throw in with Holder. Random serial numbers, used and small bills, of course.
-
Probably a lot simpler than that. $5K might be enough to convince a leftie judge anyway to throw in with Holder. Random serial numbers, used and small bills, of course.
Well, I did read he was A democratic donor and the records were not made public -so
-
Holder was supposed to meet with the media today, off the record.
But, the AP, CNN, NYT, FOX and Huffpo said they won't meet with him. Politico and the Washington ComPost said they would.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/29/holder-runs-into-roadblocks-on-off-the-record-meetings-on-leaks/
-
Holder was supposed to meet with the media today, off the record.
But, the AP, CNN, NYT, FOX and Huffpo said they won't meet with him. Politico and the Washington ComPost said they would.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/29/holder-runs-into-roadblocks-on-off-the-record-meetings-on-leaks/
I think the mainstream media is catching on that they are next on the list
-
I keep wondering just how far down the toilet Barry is going to allow Holder to go before flushing him.
-
I keep wondering just how far down the toilet Barry is going to allow Holder to go before flushing him.
Barry is waiting to see what else breaks in the news before shitcannning Holder. He'd hate to use such a high profile cabinet member for just 1 or 2 scandals. Who knows, maybe they can pin Benghazi on him, too.
-
Conflict of interest. No? It would be like if in class where students check their own school work.
-
So Eric Holder is going to look into Eric Holder?
I feel much better about things now.
-
So the guy never shows up and has one of his subordinates write a response instead.
Holder misses deadline to clear up testimony on reporter surveillance (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/05/holder-faces-close-business-deadline-to-clear-up-testimony-on-reporter/)
-
So the guy never shows up and has one of his subordinates write a response instead.
Holder misses deadline to clear up testimony on reporter surveillance (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/05/holder-faces-close-business-deadline-to-clear-up-testimony-on-reporter/)
Did he know the Verizon story was going to break? The NSA was acting on behalf of the FBI which is under the DOJ. Curious.
-
Did he know the Verizon story was going to break? The NSA was acting on behalf of the FBI which is under the DOJ. Curious.
Are you suggesting a conspiracy? Nah ;-)