The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on May 22, 2013, 05:39:06 PM
-
bigtree (49,253 posts)
Republican Holdover Petraeus Betrayed Obama on Benghazi to Protect His Own Reputation
from PoliticsUSA:
____ The bombshell that Republican hero David Petraeus was behind changes in the Benghazi talking points is another reason why Obama should not only clean out the Bush appointees, but should stop trusting Republicans in general.
The Washington Post reported late Tuesday that the emails released by the Obama administration reveal a rather shocking surprise. No, the Obama White House did not craft the Benghazi talking points to protect their reputation or that of the State Department. Nor did the State Department protect their image with “changes†to the talking points.
It was Republican hero, General David Petraeus, then the head of the CIA, who sought to burnish his image with demands to change the talking points. In fact, his version put him at “odds†with the State Department, the FBI, and officials within his own agency . . .
A close reading of recently released government e-mails that were sent during the editing process, and interviews with senior officials from several government agencies, reveal Petraeus’s early role and ambitions in going well beyond the committee’s request, apparently to produce a set of talking points favorable to his image and his agency.
The information Petraeus ordered up when he returned to his Langley office that morning included far more than the minimalist version that Ruppersberger had requested. It included early classified intelligence assessments of who might be responsible for the attack and an account of prior CIA warnings — information that put Petraeus at odds with the State Department, the FBI and senior officials within his own agency.
Ironically, given Republican claims going back to just hours after the attacks that killed four Americans, it was not the White House that tried to take over the talking points or craft them to appear in a more favorable light. In fact, the White House “played the role of mediator in the bureaucratic fight that at various points included the CIA’s top lawyer and the agency’s deputy director expressing opposition to what the director wanted.â€
. . . So even by their own argument, at the end of the witch hunt, they are face to face not with their mortal enemies of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, but their own hero and a Republican staffer or member of Congress.
read more: http://www.politicususa.com/gop-hero-petraeus-obama-changed-benghazi-talking-points.html
Kingofalldems (11,079 posts)
1. Never trust a republican is my motto.
indepat (18,907 posts)
5. If only the President had not been saddled with this right-wing prima donna
If only Republican appointees would serve their democratic President rather than just furthering their right-wing causes. If only our President would come to grips with ubiquitous and holistic Republic treachery, disloyalty, and sedition.
gopiscrap (2,456 posts)
2. ****er should be court martialed
remember when the war mongers were all over the liberals for running that ad "General Petreaus, don't betray us"? Well there was a good reason they ran it!
Cha (124,561 posts)
6. So much for Patraeus' valuable "reputation".. how long after
that did he resign amid an adultery scandal? I'm talking a real scandal here.
thanks bigtree
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022885420
-
Ironically, given Republican claims going back to just hours after the attacks that killed four Americans, it was not the White House that tried to take over the talking points or craft them to appear in a more favorable light. In fact, the White House “played the role of mediator in the bureaucratic fight that at various points included the CIA’s top lawyer and the agency’s deputy director expressing opposition to what the director wanted.â€
. . . So even by their own argument, at the end of the witch hunt, they are face to face not with their mortal enemies of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, but their own hero and a Republican staffer or member of Congress.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022885420
I was delighted to see you this brought over. It highlights just how out of touch and unable to comprehend the DUmmies are. When I read the article I went to the article site to see if perhaps the article had been poorly edited, it was not.
If it is damning to tell the truth:
The information Petraeus ordered up when he returned to his Langley office that morning included far more than the minimalist version that Ruppersberger had requested. It included early classified intelligence assessments of who might be responsible for the attack and an account of prior CIA warnings — information that put Petraeus at odds with the State Department, the FBI and senior officials within his own agency.
Then Petraeus was asking to be damned. He argued to get out the actual information not Press-t-tute Susan Rice with a cock and bull story about an inflammatory Youtube video no one had seen. Dummy FAIL and OP source FAIL. Surprised? No, not really, DUmmies try real hard, bless their hearts, but it just ain't in the cards for 'em.
-
I was delighted to see you this brought over. It highlights just how out of touch and unable to comprehend the DUmmies are. When I read the article I went to the article site to see if perhaps the article had been poorly edited, it was not.
If it is damning to tell the truth:
Then Petraeus was asking to be damned. He argued to get out the actual information not Press-t-tute Susan Rice with a cock and bull story about an inflammatory Youtube video no one had seen. Dummy FAIL and OP source FAIL. Surprised? No, not really, DUmmies try real hard, bless their hearts, but it just ain't in the cards for 'em.
That's my take, also Petraeus wanted the truth to be put out, but the Whore House over rode that with their lies to protect Obama. Then Petraeus is ousted for daring to want to tell the truth.
We've seen too many life long military members forced out under Obama. That is one of the things that needs to be investigated when he is gone.
-
What the eff world do these lunatics live in?
The leftist blog sited flat out lies by asserting he changed the talking points and then prove they lied in the article itself.
He wanted more detail and the State department wanted it removed because it was politically damaging.
-
May I suggest the perfect scapegoat............Obama.
-
Cha (124,564 posts)
6. So much for Patraeus' valuable "reputation".. how long after
that did he resign amid an adultery scandal? I'm talking a real scandal here.
thanks bigtree
The real scandal in that was 0bama and his thugs knew all about Petraeus and his affair before he was appointed. They had hoped to use that information to keep him in line, and instead of allowing them to control him, he resigned. Now don't get me wrong the affair was a bad thing morally, and a bad thing since that left him open to blackmail and other bad things. He is to blame for getting naked with that woman, but I have no doubt in my mind that the 0bama thugs tried to exploit his problem.
What the eff world do these lunatics live in?
The leftist blog sited flat out lies by asserting he changed the talking points and then prove they lied in the article itself.
He wanted more detail and the State department wanted it removed because it was politically damaging.
It was the white house, including the chief propagandist, Jay Carney, and the state department who went around blaming the video. I am unaware of Petraeus or anyone else talking about the video. So the DUmmies want to believe that Petraeus was the one who cooked up this scheme and 0bama and his thugs were dumb enough to fall for it. For the smartest president ever he sure gets fooled by the repukes an awful lot.
-
The cynic in me says the BHO admin had been holding the blackmailable (is that a word?) knowledge of Petraeus' affair for just the right time. And keeping Obama's ass out of the fire on Benghazi, was "just the right time".
-
NYTimes has an op-ed from their editorial board saying the same thing, and saying the Republicans are on a witch hunt.
I wonder if these talking points came from closed door white house meeting a few journalists attended yesterday (Talking Points Memo guy, Ezra Klein, and someone else).
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/opinion/the-cias-part-in-benghazi.html
-
NYTimes has an op-ed from their editorial board saying the same thing, and saying the Republicans are on a witch hunt.
I wonder if these talking points came from closed door white house meeting a few journalists attended yesterday (Talking Points Memo guy, Ezra Klein, and someone else).
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/opinion/the-cias-part-in-benghazi.html
JournoList
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
JournoList (sometimes referred to as the J-List)[1] was a private Google Groups forum for discussing politics and the news media with 400 "left-leaning"[2] journalists, academics and others. Ezra Klein created the online forum in February 2007 while blogging at The American Prospect and shut it down on June 25, 2010 amid public exposure and controversy. He controlled the forum's membership and limited it to "several hundred left-leaning bloggers, political reporters, magazine writers, policy wonks and academics".[2] Posts within JournoList were intended only be made and read by its members.[3] Klein defended the forum structure saying that it ensures "that folks feel safe giving off-the-cuff analysis and instant reactions".[2]
They are now more open and Obama gives them their talking points directly.
-
The real scandal in that was 0bama and his thugs knew all about Petraeus and his affair before he was appointed. They had hoped to use that information to keep him in line, and instead of allowing them to control him, he resigned. Now don't get me wrong the affair was a bad thing morally, and a bad thing since that left him open to blackmail and other bad things. He is to blame for getting naked with that woman, but I have no doubt in my mind that the 0bama thugs tried to exploit his problem.
And, GEN Petraeus did the right thing by 'falling on his sword' and depriving the OThugs of their weapon against him.
-
May I suggest the perfect scapegoat............Obama.
Don't forget his lapdog, Hillary.
Misery loves company.
-
to quote poor, stupid beth -
'lol'
Two days a go this was a 'non-scandal' and a 'nothing burger', and now ?
It's Bush's Fault. Just like everything else that Team Obama does wrong. If Bush hadn't appointed Petraeus, none of this would have happened...
'lol'
-
They are now more open and Obama gives them their talking points directly.
Journolist - yep, that's the group. I'd love to see that whole group of clowns go down with their master.
-
NYTimes has an op-ed from their editorial board saying the same thing, and saying the Republicans are on a witch hunt.
I wonder if these talking points came from closed door white house meeting a few journalists attended yesterday (Talking Points Memo guy, Ezra Klein, and someone else).
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/opinion/the-cias-part-in-benghazi.html
Makes me think there is a bomb about to be dropped on obinga and he's getting his press lackeys out in front to try and minimize the damage by smearing the messenger.
Give a liberal enough time and they'll tell you exactly what they're afraid of, and Patraeus scares the shit out of them.
-
Makes me think there is a bomb about to be dropped on obinga and he's getting his press lackeys out in front to try and minimize the damage by smearing the messenger.
Give a liberal enough time and they'll tell you exactly what they're afraid of, and Patraeus scares the shit out of them.
The rumor around DC is that there's something that will come out that is scaring the shit out of the WH senior aides.
-
The rumor around DC is that there's something that will come out that is scaring the shit out of the WH senior aides.
Arms deals? I swear I saw a story on that that disappeared almost as soon as it appeared. It would also go a long way to explaining why the Republicans don't really want to go all boots and saddles into investigation of Benghazi ( if they knew of covert arms deals with Syria via Turkey ).
-
Makes me think there is a bomb about to be dropped on obinga and he's getting his press lackeys out in front to try and minimize the damage by smearing the messenger.
Give a liberal enough time and they'll tell you exactly what they're afraid of, and Patraeus scares the shit out of them.
That's what I'm thinking. He has all the Soros funded yapping pups trying to deflect and/or discredit. Recent polls show that Americans are waking up to all the scandals and Obama, I think, is in panic mode.
The Dems just have to be shitting their pants over what's going on and how it's going to affect them in 2014. Obama may soon have bus treadmarks on his face.
Poor ol' ProSense, Cha, BigDUmbDarryl, and a few others are going overboard with their posts trying to protect Chicago Jesus. The failure is funny.
-
Arms deals? I swear I saw a story on that that disappeared almost as soon as it appeared. It would also go a long way to explaining why the Republicans don't really want to go all boots and saddles into investigation of Benghazi ( if they knew of covert arms deals with Syria via Turkey ).
Why wouldn't they, though? Arming AQ via obinga's State Dept and CIA seems like it would be a prime candidate for exploration.
-
That's what I'm thinking. He has all the Soros funded yapping pups trying to deflect and/or discredit. Recent polls show that Americans are waking up to all the scandals and Obama, I think, is in panic mode.
The Dems just have to be shitting their pants over what's going on and how it's going to affect them in 2014. Obama may soon have bus treadmarks on his face.
Can we call him "President Pirelli" after that? :fuelfire:
I think his meeting with the three leftist journos the other day is for this reason. They're scared, but doing the wrong damn thing to push it away. I think even some of the low information slaves are starting to pay attention and see past the BS.
-
Can we call him "President Pirelli" after that? :fuelfire:
I think his meeting with the three leftist journos the other day is for this reason. They're scared, but doing the wrong damn thing to push it away. I think even some of the low information slaves are starting to pay attention and see past the BS.
President Pirelli. Haha and H5!
2 of the journalists had stories on the IRS and Lois Lerner. I think they both said heads should roll at the IRS. Then the stories about Petraeus and CIA talking points from NYTimes and another lefty site.
They are definitely trying to deflect. I can imagine that Obama is having a conniption, Valerie is pissed and looking for people to take out, and Michelle is PISSED this might get in the way of her Marie Antoinette lifestyle. Oh to be a fly on the wall....
-
They are definitely trying to deflect. I can imagine that Obama is having a conniption, Valerie is pissed and looking for people to take out, and Michelle is PISSED this might get in the way of her Marie Antoinette lifestyle. Oh to be a fly on the wall....
I wonder what is up with her wanting to take an "extended" vacation? Think she wants to be gone when the shit hits the fan or has she had it with obinga's slumlord buddy?
-
Why wouldn't they, though? Arming AQ via obinga's State Dept and CIA seems like it would be a prime candidate for exploration.
Have you read this article? Many salient points.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/sources-confirm-u-s-gun-running-to-jihadists/
Note the dates and the massive lack of curiosity from the main street media.
-
Have you read this article? Many salient points.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/sources-confirm-u-s-gun-running-to-jihadists/
Note the dates and the massive lack of curiosity from the main street media.
Yeah, I understand, but why wouldn't Issa's committees want to look into that? What makes that off limits to Republicans that are trying to investigate?
-
Yeah, I understand, but why wouldn't Issa's committees want to look into that? What makes that off limits to Republicans that are trying to investigate?
Could be one of any number of reasons. Maybe Republican members knew and didn't speak out initially and are complicit in cover up and arms running themselves. Maybe they are letting Obie get tangled in the IRS and AP stuff to ding up his credibility / approval before lowering the boom of Benghazi. If Obie and friends are busy running after the small brush fires it gives the major blaze a chance to develop from the back draft. It does seem awfully strange.
-
Arms deals? I swear I saw a story on that that disappeared almost as soon as it appeared. It would also go a long way to explaining why the Republicans don't really want to go all boots and saddles into investigation of Benghazi ( if they knew of covert arms deals with Syria via Turkey ).
There was something about Chris Stevens being over there to buy back weapons from al Qaeda and it was something that the State Department was involved in, not the CIA.
-
I wonder what is up with her wanting to take an "extended" vacation? Think she wants to be gone when the shit hits the fan or has she had it with obinga's slumlord buddy?
Gotta take advantage of all the perks before getting thrown out on her huge ass?