The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Skul on May 15, 2013, 05:28:30 PM
-
This OP by The Grate Omnimpotent gNads, blows up in her face.
Over 200 comments, most are a hoot.
No way I can drag all the good stuff over.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022844583
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:24 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,908 posts)
The AP scandal *is* serious
Last edited Tue May 14, 2013, 09:25 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
The question will be how much did the WH know? We do need a shield law, like the one actually pushed by Senator Obama in 2007? YES. But listening to now two experts in two different shows...this is a real scandal unlike Benghazi and even IRS...this is the real scandal folks.
Does it rise to the I word? I don't think so, but count on Issa and crew to push all three. 24
Immediately went down hill from there. :lmao:
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:29 PM
Buzz Clik (28,492 posts)
1. just stop.
This is going nowhere.
The Buzz was being nice. Others, not so much.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #12)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:45 PM
Star Member randome (12,440 posts)
26. So whose head should roll? Tell us, please.
If Obama didn't know about this and Holder recused himself and a legitimate subpoena was obtained, who the hell's head should roll? Stop with the damned nonsense and be specific for once. Dream on. :rotf:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to randome (Reply #26)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:51 PM
Star Member Rex (34,446 posts)
37. Maybe Nadin should go back to screaming about North Korea
and the imminent war we somehow managed to miss out on.
Reporter...meh...I guess that makes me an astronaut.
The comments took on a life of there own.
On and on they went.
Response to DevonRex (Reply #28)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:51 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,908 posts)
39. Of course
I am tired of your personal attacks you know. So welcome to the children's room, better known as the ignore list. You are incapable of actually discussing things like an adult.
Good bye. :bawl:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #39)
Wed May 15, 2013, 12:44 AM
Anansi1171 (71 posts)
108. So that's who you are? Talk about childish. Add me to your list, please! -NT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to Anansi1171 (Reply #108)
Wed May 15, 2013, 02:52 PM
Star Member Floyd_Gondolli (1,099 posts)
200. Once more
Disagreeing with her (on anything) lands you on her ignore list.
All hat, no cattle. Aw contraineaire. No hat all BULL.
A couple more comments.
Response to DevonRex (Reply #63)
Tue May 14, 2013, 10:52 PM
Whisp (17,085 posts)
72. I feel guilty but laughing my ass off too.
ouch.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to Whisp (Reply #72)
Tue May 14, 2013, 11:22 PM
Star Member DevonRex (19,858 posts)
85. I stopped feeling guilty
the last time she acted condescending to us "Americans."
Well worth the time to read the whole thing. :couch: :popcorn:
-
Nadin helps to confirm my feelings on this. We don't know all the facts yet but the AP scandal feels like a manufactured scandal to redirect from Benghazi and then, of course, the IRS thing broke.
If Nadin thinks it is a big deal, then maybe it isn't? And Benghazi and IRS maybe be worst than they seem right now.
Crossing the Rubicon and following trends. Not a trained historian but I do observe.
Of course, AP could be bigger than seems right now and Nadin may be like a backward running stopped clock.
-
Response to Brickbat (Reply #58)
Tue May 14, 2013, 11:35 PM
Tarheel_Dem (16,569 posts)
92. Why anyone would trust nadin as a "reporter" is beyond me. Do you remember.....
when she "reported" in the early days of the Syria conflict, that some Occupy soldier acquaintance of hers had been killed in that conflict, and that American forces were on the ground in Syria? Turns out the dude was alive & well, and nowhere near Syria. She made the whole thing up, based on a facebook post. After hundreds of replies, and having her journalistic credibility called into serious question, she cleverly went back and self-deleted all her posts. My computer had a hard time even opening the thread because it was so reply heavy. You would think that would've embarrassed her enough that she would refrain from this kind of alarmist b.s., but alas.
Hey TarheeelDem! Welcome to the childrens' room aka Nad's ignore list.
-
dballance (3,619 posts)
204. How can anyone possibly take you seriously?
It was only a few weeks ago when you were sounding the alarm about N. Korea and how an attack was imminent on an almost daily basis. It never happened. You were wrong then and you're wrong now.
Before you want to start proclaiming a scandal at least try to find some laws that were broken first.
There is a story I recall from my childhood about the little boy who cried wolf. Maybe you should read it.
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to dballance (Reply #204)
Wed May 15, 2013, 04:25 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,909 posts)
210. I was not saying an attack was imminent
Posting the stories as posted by the world press, who agreed this was the most serious crisis. Now if in your mind that means attack was imminent, I suppose it was. But like Prosense, I have little patience any longer with people who can't comprehend what they read.
Welcome to my ignore list.
Goodbye.
Yeah, balance! Who the HELL are you to question her integretah?!?
(http://ts3.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4788945381360994&pid=1.7&w=235&h=174&c=7&rs=1)
-
OMG!!!
Response to peace13 (Reply #198)
Wed May 15, 2013, 04:19 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,909 posts)
207. But you assumed it hit home just now
Which was my point. It hit home about one third of first reading of the USPA...and that was a while ago.
This is where assumptions and famous saying come in.
And we all should be careful of making them.
As to being interrogated and all that...I have assumed, for years mind you, and correctly...that my line was taped.
And since we are having ths conversation....**** Hoover
Obama has been wire-tapping Nadin's phone line!!!
-
A real butt guster. :lmao:
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Wed May 15, 2013, 06:09 PM
Star Member Taverner (53,194 posts)
219. Yes it is. Fire Holder.
Fire him.
Make him spend time with family...
Get him the **** out of the AG office and back to the neocon cranks that he is obviously a part of. <----- :rotf:
-
Again, I must, wearily, ask.
What in the world makes the cousin think that putting people on her "iggy" list is some sort of punishment, that they're going to be deprived of something?
-
The AP thing is actually the most-legal and justifiable thing they did, of all the stuff they're being called out on now, however it is the one thing guaranteed to get the attention of the press in a very negative way, since it involves the MSM's own rice bowls and self-granted privileges.
:popcorn:
-
Again, I must, wearily, ask.
What in the world makes the cousin think that putting people on her "iggy" list is some sort of punishment, that they're going to be deprived of something?
:lalala:
-
This was a fascinating thread, a surefire DOTY qualifier!
One condescending pronouncement after another from the nutcase, attracting more and more bullies.
At least a half dozen DUmmies pay the ultimate price - banishment to the crazy bald dwarf's ignore list.
It's hilarious!
Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #15)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:44 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,911 posts)
25. So you think Issa made all this up
And reporters are just being good stenographers?
Sort of like transcribing and posting scanner chatter.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #23)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:46 PM
DevonRex (19,860 posts)
28. You're the one who doesn't get it, Nadin. As usual.
Response to DevonRex (Reply #28)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:51 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,911 posts)
39. Of course
I am tired of your personal attacks you know. So welcome to the children's room, better known as the ignore list. You are incapable of actually discussing things like an adult.
Wed May 15, 2013, 02:52 PM
Floyd_Gondolli (1,099 posts)
200. Once more
Disagreeing with her (on anything) lands you on her ignore list.
All hat, no cattle.
Attention! Resume update!
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #33)
Tue May 14, 2013, 09:53 PM
Control-Z (8,184 posts)
40. Are you a Constitutional/US scholar?
You seem to be up on the laws.
Response to ProSense (Reply #55)
Tue May 14, 2013, 10:20 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
62. My dear, it's overreach from the post watergate
Rules put in place.
Have a good one.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #62)
Tue May 14, 2013, 10:37 PM
ProSense (97,900 posts)
67. WTF?
"My dear, it's overreach from the post watergate
Rules put in place."
Watergate was a crime. This is a legal matter, subpoenaes issued and information being discussed.
The false equivalencies are becoming as bizarre as Republicans'
Maybe not quite, but seriously, comparing this to Watergate is beyond silly.
Response to ProSense (Reply #67)
Wed May 15, 2013, 12:40 AM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
104. You need to learn to read,
Once again carefully. It s an over reach from the rules put in place after the attacks on the Press after Watergate. If you cared to actually find out this shit you could.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #104)
Wed May 15, 2013, 08:43 AM
ProSense (97,900 posts)
134. This
"Once again carefully. It s an over reach from the rules put in place after the attacks on the Press after Watergate. If you cared to actually find out this shit you could."
...is beyond silly. What is it about the difference between legal and illegal don't you understand? Watergate was a crime.
Response to ProSense (Reply #134)
Wed May 15, 2013, 09:34 AM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
138. I expected no less from you
If this happened in 2008, before November, you'd be screaming for Bush's head though. Consistent, that I gotta give you. And I will be clear, I have deep scorn for partisans on both sides.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #62)
Wed May 15, 2013, 01:08 AM
Anansi1171 (78 posts)
114. Why the condescending tone and arrogant tone? Your "dear" at least takes the time
and effort to quote sources to substantiate what's said. I know it plays well with what is obviously a clique of sorts that you and the other non-partisan pontificates have here on DU.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Tue May 14, 2013, 10:14 PM
Brickbat (14,305 posts)
58. Nadin has spoken: IT IS A SCANDAL.
Response to Whisp (Reply #72)
Tue May 14, 2013, 11:22 PM
DevonRex (19,860 posts)
85. I stopped feeling guilty
the last time she acted condescending to us "Americans."
Response to Brickbat (Reply #58)
Tue May 14, 2013, 11:35 PM
Tarheel_Dem (16,578 posts)
92. Why anyone would trust nadin as a "reporter" is beyond me. Do you remember.....
when she "reported" in the early days of the Syria conflict, that some Occupy soldier acquaintance of hers had been killed in that conflict, and that American forces were on the ground in Syria? Turns out the dude was alive & well, and nowhere near Syria. She made the whole thing up, based on a facebook post.
Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #135)
Wed May 15, 2013, 09:32 AM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
137. Just so you know my husband came home from the line
In 2004.
He was in the line of fire from 1984 to 2004 when he finally retired. I have also served, under fire mind you, somewhere else...so let me tell ya, you are not that special.
Response to ProSense (Reply #154)
Wed May 15, 2013, 10:50 AM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
156. You still need to learn to read
I never said it was like watergate. What I said, for the dim witted, is that this violated protocols put in place AFTER WATERGATE, POST WATERGATE.
Can you read? Or you need it louder?
I think it is long past time to put you in the ignore list.
Goodbye.
Response to Politicub (Reply #172)
Wed May 15, 2013, 12:14 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
177. But you made assumptions about me
Which I love.
Have an excellent life in my ignore list
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Wed May 15, 2013, 03:31 PM
dballance (3,619 posts)
204. How can anyone possibly take you seriously?
It was only a few weeks ago when you were sounding the alarm about N. Korea and how an attack was imminent on an almost daily basis. It never happened. You were wrong then and you're wrong now.
Response to dballance (Reply #204)
Wed May 15, 2013, 04:25 PM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
210. I was not saying an attack was imminent
But like Prosense, I have little patience any longer with people who can't comprehend what they read.
Welcome to my ignore list.
-
omg, she is going to be talking , but noone will be listening, cus they are all on her ignore list... she needs to lighten up...
-
I have to apologize to you guys. I have a tendency to feel sorry for people, I've always been like that, when I saw Nads picture I felt sorry for her, I thought she seemed like a nice person who tried her hardest to make things better for people, she's a typical leftist, she's a narcissist and she can be nasty, the fact that she can't carry on a dialogue with people who have an opposing opinion shows how much of a narcissist she is, and to constantly tell people she's putting them on ignore is so immature. I was so wrong in what I thought initially.
-
Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #135)
Wed May 15, 2013, 09:32 AM
nadinbrzezinski (119,912 posts)
137. Just so you know my husband came home from the line
In 2004.
He was in the line of fire from 1984 to 2004People shoot at sinkers?? when he finally retired. I have also served, under fire mind youLying POS., somewhere elseOnly in your feeble mind....so let me tell ya, you are not that special.
Jeez.
-
Response to Brickbat (Reply #58)
Tue May 14, 2013, 11:35 PM
Tarheel_Dem (16,578 posts)
92. Why anyone would trust nadin as a "reporter" is beyond me. Do you remember.....
when she "reported" in the early days of the Syria conflict, that some Occupy soldier acquaintance of hers had been killed in that conflict, and that American forces were on the ground in Syria? Turns out the dude was alive & well, and nowhere near Syria. She made the whole thing up, based on a facebook post.
Turns out the dude never even made it through basic.
(http://thisainthell.us/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Jay-Polk-FOIA.jpg)
http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=28611
-
I have to apologize to you guys. I have a tendency to feel sorry for people, I've always been like that, when I saw Nads picture I felt sorry for her, I thought she seemed like a nice person who tried her hardest to make things better for people, she's a typical leftist, she's a narcissist and she can be nasty, the fact that she can't carry on a dialogue with people who have an opposing opinion shows how much of a narcissist she is, and to constantly tell people she's putting them on ignore is so immature. I was so wrong in what I thought initially.
Told you so, sweetheart. You should've listened.
-
Told you so, sweetheart. You should've listened.
I know, like I said though, I have a tendency to feel sorry for some people, sometimes it's justified sometimes it isn't.
-
I know, like I said though, I have a tendency to feel sorry for some people, sometimes it's justified sometimes it isn't.
I'm just giving you a hard time, madam; not to worry.
You're wonderful, as usual and as always.
-
You are whole, purified and atoned!
For I now perform your office.
Blessed be your suffering
Which gave the timid fool
The highest power of pity,
The might of purest knowledge!
--Parsifal
I might try to put all of you on ignore and post stuff just to experience what it must be like to be Nads. Depending on how much work it is.
-
Oops, jury just locked her out of one of her own threads. I predict an epic meltdown thread is on the way.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022850035
-
Again, I must, wearily, ask.
What in the world makes the cousin think that putting people on her "iggy" list is some sort of punishment, that they're going to be deprived of something?
Complete self-delusion and the "fantasy life" that blob has cooked up for herself.
-
Complete self-delusion and the "fantasy life" that blob has cooked up for herself.
If she can't see the people pointing and laughing, then they aren't pointing and laughing at her.
-
Quote from: Ballygrl on Today at 05:39:16 pm
I have to apologize to you guys. I have a tendency to feel sorry for people, I've always been like that, when I saw Nads picture I felt sorry for her, I thought she seemed like a nice person who tried her hardest to make things better for people, she's a typical leftist, she's a narcissist and she can be nasty, the fact that she can't carry on a dialogue with people who have an opposing opinion shows how much of a narcissist she is, and to constantly tell people she's putting them on ignore is so immature. I was so wrong in what I thought initially.
That's only natural, especially in the case of people who cannot help themselves due to an actual debilitating mental/emotional condtion. She is the way she is by choice. If I had to guess, she has been doing this since mid-childhood, at least.
If she can't see the people pointing and laughing, then they aren't pointing and laughing at her.
She probably doesn't. It's sad, but wayyyyy too funny.
-
She is the way she is by choice. If I had to guess, she has been doing this since mid-childhood, at least.
I'm not sure where the cousin is, in birth-order, but apparently she has a brother who's a physician and a sister who's a dietician, and so maybe there's some sibling jealousy involved here, as they're more than she is.
-
I have to apologize to you guys. I have a tendency to feel sorry for people, I've always been like that, when I saw Nads picture I felt sorry for her, I thought she seemed like a nice person who tried her hardest to make things better for people, she's a typical leftist, she's a narcissist and she can be nasty, the fact that she can't carry on a dialogue with people who have an opposing opinion shows how much of a narcissist she is, and to constantly tell people she's putting them on ignore is so immature. I was so wrong in what I thought initially.
Well, you took the conservative view and tried to find an underlying good in her. Can't be faulted for that. One has to remember that leftists are leftists before anything else, including family and friends. The only difference with Nads, is that instead of sacrificing herself for the good of leftist ideals, she works hard to insure others believe that she is at the center of their universe.
She would be dangerous if she weren't so incompetent.