The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Mr Mannn on May 01, 2013, 09:11:35 AM

Title: Gore on 2000"No Intermediate Step Between Supreme Court And Violent Revolution"
Post by: Mr Mannn on May 01, 2013, 09:11:35 AM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/04/30/gore_no_intermediate_step_between_a_final_supreme_court_decision_and_a_violent_revolution.html
Al Gore: "No Intermediate Step Between A Final Supreme Court Decision And A Violent Revolution"
last paragraph
Quote
"I did not know she was going to say it. I made the decision in the aftermath of the Supreme Court decision 12 years ago, to respect the rule of law. I strongly disagreed with their opinion, said so, but the rule of law is the bedrock of American democracy. There is no intermediate step between a final Supreme Court decision and a violent revolution. what was best for the country, the answer was very simple, to respect the rule of law and avoid undermining it and dragging the court into a partisan squabble where the outcome would not change in any case. So I am going to stand by my decision to respect the judiciary," Gore said.

News for Al: there is no intermediate step because the US Supreme Court is the FINAL word on any subject.

Bonus Video at link. it's on tape! It is 15 minutes long, if you don't want to hear so much crap skip to 13:20 for the meat.
Title: Re: Gore on 2000"No Intermediate Step Between Supreme Court And Violent Revolution"
Post by: Ptarmigan on May 01, 2013, 01:49:57 PM
Al Gore is still obsessing about it? :wtf2:  :mental:  :whatever: ::)
Title: Re: Gore on 2000"No Intermediate Step Between Supreme Court And Violent Revolution"
Post by: wasp69 on May 01, 2013, 01:51:30 PM
Stochastic terrorism...
Title: Re: Gore on 2000"No Intermediate Step Between Supreme Court And Violent Revolution"
Post by: njpines on May 01, 2013, 02:14:36 PM
Al Gore is still obsessing about it? :wtf2:  :mental:  :whatever: ::)

The DUmmies still are and he's their Goracle  :mental:
Title: Re: Gore on 2000"No Intermediate Step Between Supreme Court And Violent Revolution"
Post by: JohnnyReb on May 01, 2013, 02:39:00 PM
They were ready to revolt but after taking inventory and finding they were a few million guns short of an army....then they did the French thing....give up.
Title: Re: Gore on 2000"No Intermediate Step Between Supreme Court And Violent Revolution"
Post by: thundley4 on May 01, 2013, 02:39:20 PM
The left still obsesses about the 2000 election, but they want to forget about Benghazi that happened about 7 months ago.
Title: Re: Gore on 2000"No Intermediate Step Between Supreme Court And Violent Revolution"
Post by: txradioguy on May 02, 2013, 04:35:05 AM
Actually this case should have never gone to the SCOTUS. 


Jeb Bush had submitted the certified election results showing W as the winner in Florida to the Feds.

Once that's done according to the law it's a done deal.  Any issue to be fought would have next gone to the Congress when they counted and certified the EC votes.

All of the litigation by Algore after that was a moot point in the eyes of the law...despite the fact the Florida Supreme Court was trying to rewrite election law on the fly.


ManBearPig was never going to be President under any recount scenario.


[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=AV0JncgLP9Y[/youtube]