The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on April 26, 2013, 08:23:46 PM

Title: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: dutch508 on April 26, 2013, 08:23:46 PM
Quote
hootinholler (20,539 posts)

Boston was not terrorism  http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022760986

I don't care what anyone says, this is how it must be officially. You see if it officially becomes terrorism nearly every insurance policy will have the Terrorism exclusion clause kick in. This was mentioned on NPR tonight, a few minutes ago.

So well it was ugly, but not terrorism.


 :thatsright:

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (119,211 posts)
12. Terrorism is considered an act of war

Which is an exclusion too



 :thatsright: :thatsright:

Quote
Leslie Valley (306 posts)
16. Right, and Nidal Hasan shooting up Ft Hood was just "work place violence"

Thus no Purple Heart for the wounded.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/04/02/fort_hood_victim_denied_purple_hearts_over_work_place_violence_label.html

Call it what it is, nobody is fooled.

Oh Leslie... you are not long for the DUmp...

 
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: Chris_ on April 26, 2013, 08:42:59 PM
Even Barney Frank calls it terrorism.  I guess DUmmies are just homophobic or something.

Quote
Frank: I Don’t Know Why President Obama Will Not Define Boston Terror Attack As Jihad

Former Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank (D.) said he has no idea why President Obama will not define the Boston terror attack is “Islamic jihad” Friday on the “O’Reilly Factor”:

President Obama’s refusal to define the attack as jihad represents a continuation of the administration’s policy to downplay the threat of Islamic extremism.

The FBI has uncovered extensive evidence through hospital interviews with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev that suggest an Islamic religious motivation for the terror attacks.
Washington Free Beacon (http://freebeacon.com/frank-i-dont-know-why-president-obama-will-not-define-boston-terror-attack-as-jihad/)
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: I_B_Perky on April 26, 2013, 08:49:49 PM
Even Barney Frank calls it terrorism.  I guess DUmmies are just homophobic or something.

It was a "man made disaster".   :fuelfire: :fuelfire:
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: Chris_ on April 26, 2013, 08:50:50 PM
It was a "man made disaster".   :fuelfire: :fuelfire:
So is Barney Frank's rectum.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: I_B_Perky on April 26, 2013, 08:54:08 PM
So is Barney Frank's rectum.

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! That made me laugh Chris!!!! H5!!!!   :cheersmate: :cheersmate:
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: JohnnyReb on April 27, 2013, 03:48:46 AM
So is Barney Frank's rectum.

The doctor told Bonnie Fwank to cough but what everyone in the office heard was.....

COUGH.....COUGH......COUGH.....COUGH......GOUGH....COUGH
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 27, 2013, 06:02:21 AM
Bombs aren't terrorism.

THE NRA IS!
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: Crazy Horse on April 27, 2013, 07:39:52 AM
Bombs aren't terrorism.

THE NRA IS!

Damn straight.

It was a false flag op using seals.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: JohnnyReb on April 27, 2013, 10:13:23 AM
Damn straight.

It was a false flag op using seals.

Did they balance the pressure cookers on their nose?
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: jukin on April 27, 2013, 11:24:41 AM
Just as soon as a white conservative does something like this it will be TERRORISM!!!!11111!!!!!1111eleventy

Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on April 27, 2013, 11:36:21 AM
Quote
Former Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank (D.) said he has no idea why President Obama will not define the Boston terror attack is “Islamic jihad” Friday on the “O’Reilly Factor”:

Funny how the liberals get all excited when it happens to or near them.  Nothing like a little jolt to wake them out of Utopia.


...and this too shall pass.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on April 27, 2013, 11:42:52 AM
Just as soon as a white conservative does something like this it will be TERRORISM!!!!11111!!!!!1111eleventy

And, as those who have actually been to many other foreign countries know, in probably the least racist country on earth, they would scream raaaaaaacism.

Almost 50 years, I am still waiting for the first one.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: beefeater on April 27, 2013, 02:36:12 PM
Quote
Quote
Leslie Valley (306 posts)
16. Right, and Nidal Hasan shooting up Ft Hood was just "work place violence"

Thus no Purple Heart for the wounded.

http://www.realclearpolit...place_violence_label.html

Call it what it is, nobody is fooled.

Oh Leslie... you are not long for the DUmp...

You are correct sir. I just got TS'd again a few minutes ago.

Oddly enough it had nothing to do with this post, it was a reply I made to an OP that one of my other moles started. I frequently argue with myself at the DUmp just to stir the shitte a little more.

A few years back I got a little too clever and had a noob mole AND a long termed one TS'd in the same post.

Oh well, plenty more where Leslie Valley came from.

Oh BTW DUmmies, see you in the "sooper secret" MIRT forum. Be careful what you say.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: Kimberly on April 27, 2013, 05:16:57 PM
Quote
You are correct sir. I just got TS'd again a few minutes ago.

Oddly enough it had nothing to do with this post, it was a reply I made to an OP that one of my other moles started. I frequently argue with myself at the DUmp just to stir the shitte a little more.

A few years back I got a little too clever and had a noob mole AND a long termed one TS'd in the same post.

Oh well, plenty more where Leslie Valley came from.

Oh BTW DUmmies, see you in the "sooper secret" MIRT forum. Be careful what you say.


 Nice job. :cheers2: I don't know how you do for so long. They make me too angry to keep it up for any length of time.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: miskie on April 27, 2013, 05:55:19 PM
Excellent, beefeater

I still have yet to be Tombstoned/PPRd by DU. Which means I have at least one longstanding mole, or none at all. I'll never tell.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: Chris_ on April 27, 2013, 06:00:34 PM
PPR'd is such a ridiculous term.  I guess the PC libs at the DUmp felt 'tombstoning' was too hurtful.
Title: Re: Boston was not terrorism
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on April 27, 2013, 07:13:48 PM

A few years back I got a little too clever and had a noob mole AND a long termed one TS'd in the same post.

 :rotf: