The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on March 23, 2013, 02:37:40 PM

Title: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: franksolich on March 23, 2013, 02:37:40 PM
Are the primitives being paranoid again?

Yesterday (Friday), while inspecting a campfire on Skins’s island, I noticed one primitive mentioned she’d changed something so as to deter “stalkers” from finding her.

She wasn’t specific as to who was “stalking” her, but one assumes she’s accusing the usual suspects, who’ve been oft-accused but never proven.

There might be a slim-to-none chance she was actually referring to her own fellow primitives--Fat Che comes to mind--but I doubt it.  Even though if someone’s stalking her, it’s most likely a primitive, and not a decent and civilized person.

Eight years ago, franksolich and others associated with him were constantly warning the grotesquely-obese Polynesian queen, the “troubleinwinter” primitive, that Fat Che was setting her up to be blackmailed, although whether he was seeking money or perverted sex was uncertain, warnings to which she paid no attention. 

Well, the primitive woman bothered by cold weather is no longer in this time and place.

If I were a primitive, I wouldn’t worry about non-primitives.  I’d worry much about my fellow primitives.

What made this allegation of this particular primitive laughable is that she thought she was a primitive worth being “stalked” (quotation marks intentional, as no one here stalks), when even long-time observers of Skins’s island had never even heard of her.

Because of their narcissism, and inflated sense of self-worth, one supposes a great many primitives think themselves worthy of the notice of primitive-watchers; a PoP, “primitive of prominence.”

The blunt fact is that, out of circa 3,500-4,000 primitives on Skins’s island, there’s only about fifty PoP, all the rest being members of the faceless lynch mob over there, the lumpenunterprimitiven, the PonP, “primitives of non-prominence.”

And even if one’s a PoP, no one pays any attention to them outside of what they yap about on Skins’s island; they go through daily real life unwatched, unremarked-upon, uninterferred with.  I’m sure that if one of us ever met the paranoid primitive described earlier, in real life, we’d have not the slightest idea.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: Mr Mannn on March 23, 2013, 02:39:48 PM
Hmmm. I thought they just sprayed for paranoia. Skinner will be ticked.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: hillneck on March 23, 2013, 02:48:44 PM
I think it has something to do with their drug use, either present day or in the past. 
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 23, 2013, 03:16:35 PM
It was that fat, huge-boobed DUmpette in the sweater.

She's worried about stalkers?

I guess that's why she has all the security signs and that little yappy dog.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: franksolich on March 23, 2013, 04:52:43 PM
It was that fat, huge-boobed DUmpette in the sweater.

She's worried about stalkers?

I guess that's why she has all the security signs and that little yappy dog.

It doesn't look quite as bad as what Pamela did, but it comes close, this having the jugs swung off opposite directions, but it looks pretty bad, nothing this red-blooded male would bother pursuing.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: GOBUCKS on March 23, 2013, 05:20:12 PM
There's been no real stalking since coach spent all that time down in Oklahoma.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: franksolich on March 23, 2013, 05:27:17 PM
There's been no real stalking since coach spent all that time down in Oklahoma.

I wouldn't call it "stalking," but I was in south-central Kansas for an afternoon in January.

Haven't been up over in Michigan or way over to Delaware, or up by Fargo, North Dakota, so don't blame me.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: Tucker on March 23, 2013, 08:21:23 PM
yes, but they've always been paranoid.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: diesel driver on March 24, 2013, 08:00:45 AM
DUmmies have always been, and shall always be, paranoid.

I merely want to help by "pouring gasoline on the fire."   :fuelfire:
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on March 24, 2013, 11:20:35 AM
This one was easy.  They'll never change.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: J P Sousa on March 24, 2013, 12:32:50 PM
I think they are born paranoid. It's in their genes.  :-)
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: Duke Nukum on March 24, 2013, 12:42:53 PM
Maybe our friend, Billiam Pitts, has something to do with this? Or knows more about it.


The Bostonian Drunkard recently posted something about stalkers.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: Dori on March 24, 2013, 12:48:44 PM
 :tinfoil: :tinfoil2: :tinfoil2: :tinfoil2:   

:mental:
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: Ptarmigan on March 25, 2013, 05:54:45 PM
Paranoia runs very deep at DU.
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: DefiantSix on March 25, 2013, 06:28:19 PM
It's what they do.


[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbpwJFi152U[/youtube]
Title: Re: poll: are the primitives being paranoid again?
Post by: BlueStateSaint on March 25, 2013, 08:27:09 PM
I'm rather surprised that no one has posted this video yet.

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9ObLGRq33o[/youtube]