The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on February 28, 2013, 06:53:48 PM
-
The Straight Story (39,713 posts)
Change child porn punishments (make em softer)? Federal commission thinks it’s a good idea
Change child porn punishments? Federal commission thinks it’s a good idea
EAU CLAIRE, Wis. (WEAU) – How would you feel about softer penalties for those who look at and distribute child pornography?
Well a government commission thinks that could be a good idea.
A new report from the U.S. Sentencing Commission is calling on Congress to change federal punishments relating to child porn.
The study of 2,700 cases shows the internet has created a big gray area when it comes to child porn and laws need to be updated to reflect a difference between who's simply looking at the illegal materials and who’s sharing them.
The findings show federal law enforcement agencies handle nearly 2,000 child porn prosecutions a year, that's up from 700 a decade ago.
...
“The old ones where they actually make the child pornography, some of these internet possessors are the actual child predators. The other ones are college students who go to chat rooms and are interested, look at this stuff, don’t know it’s on their computer, kind of the curious browser,†Gibbs said.
The study suggests judges aren't taking this into account, often throwing the book at even the curious.
http://www.weau.com/home/headlines/Change-child-porn-punishments-Federal-commission-thinks-its-a-good-idea--194062391.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022442984
Couple this with the thread on whether or not pedophiles are born that way and you can not convince me that they are not going to try to normalize pedophilia. :banghead:
-
There was a guy a couple of towns over who was a bus driver for handicapped children, who was abusing and videotaping young boys. When they caught him, he had over 10K pictures/videos on his computer. He got 160 years of federal time, with the state cases against him still pending.
And the dipshit is APPEALING. Personally, I say he gets one chance, and if he doesn't go free, he gets to play human pinata.
-
What type of person is "curious browser" of child porn? :mental:
-
What type of person is "curious browser" of child porn? :mental:
Pete Townsend.
-
What type of person is "curious browser" of child porn? :mental:
They can't help it, they were born that way doncha know? :mental:
-
There is a whole movement of people trying to legalize pedophilia, call themselves NAMbLA(North American Man/Boy Love Association). They have lawyers and everything. And their biggest defense? If homosexuals can be considered born that way, and are being accepted, why can't we? And stupid liberals are always asking me, why do you care if homosexuals are allowed to marry? It's not hurting anyone. Ya, until it's used to legalize this disgusting bullcrap. Then were all screwed.
:argh:
-
There is a whole movement of people trying to legalize pedophilia, call themselves NAMbLA(North American Man/Boy Love Association). They have lawyers and everything. And their biggest defense? If homosexuals can be considered born that way, and are being accepted, why can't we? And stupid liberals are always asking me, why do you care if homosexuals are allowed to marry? It's not hurting anyone. Ya, until it's used to legalize this disgusting bullcrap. Then were all screwed.
:argh:
Homos will stop at nothing to gain access to our children. Right now, they have focused on the target rich environment of the Boys Scouts. They are also targeting the public school system kindergarteners.
-
I can go along with making the punishments softer.....drown them instead of hanging them.....hey, water is soft ain't it?
-
I can go along with making the punishments softer.....drown them instead of hanging them.....hey, water is soft ain't it?
Uh huh, and a permanent "soft" as in castration works too.
-
Uh huh, and a permanent "soft" as in castration works too.
But my way is sure fire and permanent.
-
But my way is sure fire and permanent.
It would only be sure "fire" if they were drowned in gasoline. :fuelfire:
-
But my way is sure fire and permanent.
Why do either or. I say castration followed by the execution method of their choice :cheersmate:
-
It would only be sure "fire" if they were drowned in gasoline. :fuelfire:
I am a tightwad.....at $4 a gallon I would only use gas if I could put one of those cone shaped dog collar things around their neck and use less than a gallon of gas.
-
Why do either or. I say castration followed by the execution method of their choice :cheersmate:
Milady, let's 'flesh it out' a tad. Let's make it castration, by a dull knife without anesthetics, then the children get to pick the method of execution. Yes, they will be provided a 'menu' of methods. :fuelfire:
JR, you gotta go all 'austerity' on me, don't 'cha . . . :tongue: