The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on February 24, 2013, 01:17:35 PM
-
coljam (17 posts)
Woman and children don't read too scarry....What if the GOP got what they want
Many times I think what would like be live with an unencumbered GOP.
Schools would be privatized,
teachers unions banned and we would be teaching to the lowest common denominator.
Abortion would be illegal.
We would have a flat tax where those with the most would pay the least.
Religion would be taught in schools and prayers would be set by the local school board.
Science taught would be up to the local clergy.
Firefighters ,police and jails would all be privatized if you ran out of money your house could burn down or the police would not show up.
All the poor would be put in labor camps so that they would have to earn their welfare or government benefits.
Corporations would pay no taxes and would control all elections
Wake up America these guys are not only dangerous but also crazy.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251289837
Angry Dragon (23,750 posts)
1. You forgot to include giving SS and Medicare to Wall Street
supernova (39,038 posts)
2. It would be a return to mideval feudalism
with overlords and serfs, nothing in between.
The only difference would be replace "liege lord" with "corporation."
coljam (17 posts)
3. I forgot guns
Think about crazy lack of gun regs
Jim__ (8,393 posts)
4. People might believe that women are incapable of dealing with dangerous possibilities. - n/t
Must be talking about the title of the thread.
Either the OP is just another dime a dozen moonbat who has no clue about anything, or we have another mole sighting.
-
"Scarry"?
"Mideval"?
This thread must be a bunch of nadin sockpuppets.
-
This is a mole embarrassment. :censored:
-
Who knew Nads had sock-puppets?
And we seem to have most of that now, with a Democrat administration and Senate, since every goody that they think the megacorps would get under the GOP is pretty much what Obama's corporate bundlers already enjoy.
-
Jim__ (8,393 posts)
4. People might believe that women are incapable of dealing with dangerous possibilities. - n/t
Which is why Republicans say to women if they're being raped to pee or puke on themselves...oh, wait. Nevermind.
And "teaching to the lowest common denominator"? Seriously? Seems that concept has been embraced by the liberals for the last half-century in academia, what with college grads with six-figure loan debt who can barely read their diploma--and that's the ENGLISH portions, forget the Latin portions of their diplomas.
I mean, I could fisk these posts all day long, but really, what's the point? DUmmies not only lie badly, they're horrible at projecting as well.
-
"All the poor would be put in labor camps so that they would have to earn their welfare or government benefits."
While visiting the socialist paradise of Viet Nam a couple of years back, my wife remarked on the women tending the flower beds in common areas of the cities. Our guide (they call them minders) ex planed that all pensioners were expected to earn their meager benefits by helping to maintain public areas and buildings. The dummies have some big surprises coming if the democrats get enough power that they don't have to worry about votes.
-
Jim__ (8,393 posts)
4. People might believe that women are incapable of dealing with dangerous possibilities. - n/t
You mean people like Joe Salazar, D-CO, who wants us to toot on a whistle if we're threatened, because, otherwise, our flighty little scatterbrained selves will pop a round?
People are beginning to see through all your ridiculous hyperbole, DUmmies. You cretins have overplayed your hand.
-
We would have a flat tax where those with the most would pay the least.
What that hell?????
-
What that hell?????
That's the one that I don't understand. I guess they are so stupid that they don't understand percentages.
-
coljam (17 posts)
We would have a flat tax where those with the most would pay the least.
Yeah, tell me how that happens, DUmbass.
-
Quote
We would have a flat tax where those with the most would pay the least.
What that hell?????
Yes, they really are that stupid. I present:
Woman and children don't read too scarry
Uh-huh. Unemployed PhD.
-
Private schools tend to outperform public schools by a considerable margin. Regarding "teaching to the lowest denominator" public schools in California have something called the Focal Student Program, where they pick the lowest performing black and hispanic students (no whites allowed) and direct their teaching to those students, with the belief that helping those students learn will help everybody learn. :hammer:
-
Private schools tend to outperform public schools by a considerable margin. Regarding "teaching to the lowest denominator" public schools in California have something called the Focal Student Program, where they pick the lowest performing black and hispanic students (no whites allowed) and direct their teaching to those students, with the belief that helping those students learn will help everybody learn. :hammer:
I don't get the mixed class thing. No two kids are alike. Some take longer than others to catch on and others are gifted and bored to tears. Why can't they separate kids according to where they are test-wise and assign teachers and work loads according to their capability?
This is one of the reasons I took mine out of public and put them in private. There was no challenge and they were disruptive and bored.
-
I don't get the mixed class thing. No two kids are alike. Some take longer than others to catch on and others are gifted and bored to tears. Why can't they separate kids according to where they are test-wise and assign teachers and work loads according to their capability?
This is one of the reasons I took mine out of public and put them in private. There was no challenge and they were disruptive and bored.
That would be my preference as well, but from what I've read in some cases classes tended to break out somewhat on racial lines, and people complained about segregation.
-
Science taught would be up to the local clergy.
Missed this one, first time through. Truth be known, retard, that is exactly what got us out of the Dark Ages and kick started the Renaissance. It's also why a B/B+ student like myself went from Catholic grade school to public high school two grades ahead.
But, do carry on with your mud pies.....
-
coljam (17 posts)
Woman and children don't read too scarry....What if the GOP got what they want
Many times I think what would like be live with an unencumbered GOP.
Sexist pig! Unencumbered? Pretty much what it was like to live in this country when the federal government kept their mitts off everything except what the constitution told them they could do.
Schools would be privatized,
teachers unions banned and we would be teaching to the lowest common denominator.
Well, this is one this I would really like to see (at the very least the banning of teachers' unions...they work for the "teachers" and the liberal establishment, not the students). As even LIBERAL homeschoolers will point out, before public education, in the 17th & 18th centuries, literacy rates were in the high 90 percentages. Their textbook? The King James Bible. Teacher? Mom or dad. The liberal establishment is screwing America's children, especially minority children. Look at literacy rates in the inner cities, dumb shit! They've been a wholly owned subsidiary of the democrat machine for decades and decades.
Abortion would be illegal.
Overturning ROE (who even "Roe" regrets) would not make abortion illegal, it would allow the states...you know, "the people", the ones you say all your overbearing control is geared towards EMPOWERING...would be able to choose, through state law, whether they want their states to allow women to murder their unborn children.
We would have a flat tax where those with the most would pay the least.
Yep, they're really that stupid! A flat tax means EVERYONE pays the same percent of their income. There are no deductions, thus a true 10% tax is 10% regardless of income. As usual, generational slaves you guys have relegated to your inner city tenement plantations, would most likely be exempt.
Religion would be taught in schools and prayers would be set by the local school board.
Science taught would be up to the local clergy.
This didn't even happen when I was in school and that was before the propagandists took over education. Of course, one could actually refer to God without being expelled, but I never once said a prayer in school, except the ones I whispered to myself. And just so you know, even Christian science & math books teach the same kind of science they do in public schools. Only more in depth and without the global warming climate change. Some of the greatest scientists in history made their discoveries because the wanted to prove God. You guys are idiots.
Firefighters ,police and jails would all be privatized if you ran out of money your house could burn down or the police would not show up.
Uh, firefighters & police are LOCAL. That means even very conservative communities pay for fire & police. In smaller (conservative) communities like mine, a good percentage of the firefighters are volunteers (that means they don't get any government pension for saving their neighbor's farm). And yet, they show up. We pay for fire & police through our property taxes. When they need new equipment, it goes on the local ballot. Oh, as far as one's house burning down because you don't pay their fees, house burns down while firefighters watch (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/tennessee-family-home-burns-while-firefighters-watch-191241763.html). Evidently there was a $75 fee required by the GOVERNMENT to outlying areas if they wanted fire service. Jails have already been privatized, albeit a very small percent, for a while now.
All the poor would be put in labor camps so that they would have to earn their welfare or government benefits.
Corporations would pay no taxes and would control all elections
Wake up America these guys are not only dangerous but also crazy.
That's just ****ing stupid! I mean too stupid to be walking around. Put in a labor camp stupid. There's nothing wrong with requiring work for welfare benefits (even communist countries have done/do that). Why shouldn't they have to do some kind of community service when those people having the money confiscated from their paychecks have to WORK for their money? Justify that.
Cindie
-
"Scarry"?
"Mideval"?
This thread must be a bunch of nadin sockpuppets.
But anything we'd do to the education system would be bad for some reason.
-
Isn't "labor camps" just a euphemism for "Marxist country?"
-
Missed this one, first time through. Truth be known, retard, that is exactly what got us out of the Dark Ages and kick started the Renaissance. It's also why a B/B+ student like myself went from Catholic grade school to public high school two grades ahead.
But, do carry on with your mud pies.....
I recently received a nursing degree from a Catholic university, and I attend church on a regular basis. But oh no, Christians hate science ::)
-
I recently received a nursing degree from a Catholic university, and I attend church on a regular basis. But oh no, Christians hate science ::)
They taught blood letting and leeches right? :-)
-
On rereading, I am beginning to think that coljam is either a very savvy mole or a very stupid mole.
-
Corporations would pay no taxes and would control all elections
Corporations don't pay taxes NOW, DUmbass. WE DO!
As far as corporations controlling elections, no need to, when you have lobbists controlling the elected.