The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Billiam Pitts on February 14, 2013, 10:33:35 AM

Title: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Billiam Pitts on February 14, 2013, 10:33:35 AM
Looks like nads has been having a threesome with zappaman and REP, nads BBW pumpkin, coffee shop, journo-porn anyone?   REP is a host and has been stalking nads in the star chamber Host forum. How many star chambers do they have over there? META forum, MIRT forum, Host forums. It's starting to look like a regular STASI which is appropriate for those godless communist DUmmies.

Thread is a nads thread in META called "Apparently warning people of the CTs already out there" with all the usual drunk misspellings, etc. She met a crazy... another crazy person in the coffee shop/news room and then told the bouncy in GD and it got locked.

 :tinfoil:



:blah:
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (116,306 posts)

Apparently warning people of the CTs already out there

Last edited Wed Feb 13, 2013, 09:32 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)
Due to the shooting is hidabe, cause we should not be aware of what is out there

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022369055

None of us believe this. At least I hope so. But I am sure in the next 24-48 hours fringy things like these will make the rounds on Stormfront (this kid struck me as the type)...Alex Jones...et al.

We were, those of us left with falling jaws in the flesh, gobsmacked.

But DU is weird these days.

A WARNING of what is already out there does not mean it I means we all need to hide our collective heads in the sand.

So be it.

I promised, hides and locks will be coming here, so they will.

As to this kid...I was gobsmacked amazed. I am glad I did not write the full CT he truly believes on Junior Seau...though I will admit, a piece of fiction could come from that. It was just WOW!

Oh and one more thing...mews cycle.

But I absolutely give up on this place...at times it is undeciferable.

I expect posts pointing to FB pages soon, like the Newton Truthers, on DU GD no less.
:blah:

Quote
REP (17,848 posts)
1. As I just DUMailed you (I was the locking Host)

All conspiracy theory talk is against the SoP of GD. We've already locked a few of these, and we'll undoubtedly be locking a bunch more.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (116,306 posts)
3. And how many of the CT and Newton Truthers were on GD as part of the news cycle?

I will leave it at that.

I will bring each and every of these to meta any more.

Quote
REP (17,848 posts)
4. There is no "big news" exception to the "no CTs" in GD

Last edited Wed Feb 13, 2013, 09:38 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I'm not on DU 24/7. I don't know if some slipped through. That's not a reason to allow every SoP violation.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski (116,306 posts)
5. Yet they were let be

I am done. I said my piece.

Have a good day.

Quote
REP (17,848 posts)
6. Check GD today

This ain't grade school.

Quote
Hassin Bin Sober (8,099 posts)
11. That is a bad lock.

So now we can't talk about kooky conspiracy theories with the intent of pointing and laughing?

We can't discuss birthers anymore?

Quote
Violet_Crumble (27,976 posts)
12. Skinner said we are allowed to laugh at CS

What's not allowed is to post ops agreeing with them. Please don't make up yr own rules about what is and isn't allowed in GD.

Also as a host I've noticed some antagonism towards nads from you as u were one of the few hosts to try to justify zappamans recent lock of one of nads ops. If you were a good host you'd recuse yrself from involvement in cases like this.

I wish you'd show more interest in how admin want us to host and a bit less interested in trying to control other DUers.

Quote
Hassin Bin Sober (8,099 posts)
13. Yep. It's pretty obvious what went on here.

Rep made a new rule for a Nadin thread and it was seconded and agreed on by one of Nadin's (still a host) major "fans"

Quote
REP This message was hidden by Jury decision. Hide
20. Don't lie.

That's pretty low, even for you.

A Jury voted 6-0 to hide this post on Thu Feb 14, 2013, 02:56 AM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See Community Standards.)

Cannot reply to hidden messages

Poor REP got his post hidden and then was locked out of the thread, I hate it when that happen, gravy for the goose and all that.

Quote
Violet_Crumble (27,976 posts)
21. I'm not lying on either count...

Skinner did tell hosts DUers are allowed to post OPs laughing at zany conspiracy theories...

'I think laughing at kooky right-wing conspiracy crap is fine.

I don't see the need to lock stuff like this. Nobody here is agreeing with it.'

http://www.democraticunderground.com/124335403#post11

And after that you continued to try to lock OPs by DUers poking fun at conspiracy theories. Now yr in Meta misleading DUers about what is and isn't allowed in GD.

As for yr antagonism towards Nadin, everyone with access to the Hosts forum saw the way you looked for justification for zappaman's lock of her OP and the way you totally ignored that he was just a tad obsessed with her and his personal feelings were clouding his judgement. And today what I saw in the thread about Nad's OP was you carrying on about Nadin herself and complaining about her. I can copy and paste what you said in here if you want to try to continue to falsely call me a liar..

Oh, and what you just said wasn't nice at all. Is there a need to get abusive like that?


Then this little gem that turns into a "Papers Please!" exchange:


Quote
Hassin Bin Sober (8,099 posts)
16. you've been a member since January?

You are a quick learner!! Kudos!!

Quote
sad-cafe This message was hidden by Jury decision. Hide
17. yes logged in to post in Jan

family obligations kept me from getting to involved until then. I had, however, been a very active reader for 8 years. I know the background behind Ms. Nadin the narcissist. I worked with the type for years. Grated me then, grates on me now. She is not the victim of bullying, she is the victim of not liking being called on her BS. Pure and Simple.
A Jury voted 5-1 to hide this post on Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:25 AM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See Community Standards.)
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: chitownchica on February 14, 2013, 11:25:20 AM
 :rotf:
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Skul on February 14, 2013, 11:29:23 AM
The troof! it buuurns!   :lmao:
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 14, 2013, 01:16:41 PM
The troof! it buuurns!   :lmao:

Nads, this is to you . . .

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXoNE14U_zM[/youtube]
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Wineslob on February 14, 2013, 01:55:16 PM
Gnads......three way......=  :puke:
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: njpines on February 14, 2013, 01:58:04 PM
Gnads......three way......=  :puke:

That's my reaction exactly -- Nads and three way should never even exist in the same universe, let alone the same sentence!   :runaway:
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: hillneck on February 14, 2013, 02:16:14 PM
Quote
sad-cafe This message was hidden by Jury decision. Hide
17. I know the background behind Ms. Nadin the narcissist. I worked with the type for years. Grated me then, grates on me now. She is not the victim of bullying, she is the victim of not liking being called on her BS. Pure and Simple.
A Jury voted 5-1 to hide this post on Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:25 AM. Reason: This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See Community Standards


OK, whose mole voted to keep the post from being hidden?  Poor old Nads, she hasn't had any love on the island latety.  :rotf:
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Billiam Pitts on February 14, 2013, 02:23:00 PM

OK, whose mole voted to keep the post from being hidden?  Poor old Nads, she hasn't had any love on the island latety.  :rotf:

nads is hated over there, cavers give nads way more love than at the DUng Heap and they are supposed to be her friends.
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 14, 2013, 02:26:38 PM
nads is hated over there, cavers give nads way more love than at the DUng Heap and they are supposed to be her friends.

:runaway:
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Gina on February 14, 2013, 02:33:30 PM
Holy shit they are control freaks!!!!!

I love this place, no one tells you what to post. They just BS you  :lmao:
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Airwolf on February 14, 2013, 03:49:08 PM
Has anyone noticed that even Sarrah I'maboobie hasn't come to defend El Guapo lately?
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: miskie on February 14, 2013, 04:41:10 PM
I enjoy the way Violet_Crumble refers to "Nadin" as "Nads" - I wonder where she got that notion from ?
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Big Dog on February 14, 2013, 07:03:55 PM
I enjoy the way Violet_Crumble refers to "Nadin" as "Nads" - I wonder where she got that notion from ?

Hmmm.......

Perhaps a certain Cave?

(http://i1254.photobucket.com/albums/hh610/elect-stevedawes/cave_zps80c13e89.jpg)
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: dutch508 on February 14, 2013, 08:12:51 PM
Holy shit they are control freaks!!!!!

I love this place, no one tells you what to post. They just BS you  :lmao:

Dont think of iut as a bitchslap. Think of it as me patting your cute ass... really hard.

 :-)
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Airwolf on February 14, 2013, 09:19:44 PM
Hmmm.......

Perhaps a certain Cave?

(http://i1254.photobucket.com/albums/hh610/elect-stevedawes/cave_zps80c13e89.jpg)

We need to hold a meeting of the VRWC home decor committee and see if they can get some new furniture in the cave. That old 80's porn studio look needs to go.
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 15, 2013, 04:48:08 AM
We need to hold a meeting of the VRWC home decor committee and see if they can get some new furniture in the cave. That old 80's porn studio look needs to go.

It's a low, low-priority message.  Sort of the junk mail, or spam, of the VRWC Message traffic.
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: whiffleball on February 15, 2013, 05:58:21 AM
Has anyone noticed that even Sarrah I'maboobie hasn't come to defend El Guapo lately?

Nor has Sabrina.  If Gnads has lost those two she's really stepped in it.  The Maggot has been around to assist the Pedantic Pumpkin at times. 
Title: Re: nads threeway in Meta stirs trouble
Post by: Airwolf on February 15, 2013, 10:53:47 AM
It's a low, low-priority message.  Sort of the junk mail, or spam, of the VRWC Message traffic.

But, but think of the children.........(DU mode off)