The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Terrorism In the US and Around the World => Topic started by: thundley4 on January 30, 2013, 03:28:27 AM
-
U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying 'the idea is approved by Washington'
Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was 'totally unacceptable'
Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.
A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.
According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam's Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
It reads: 'Phil... We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
'We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
'They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
'Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
'Kind regards, David.'
Britam Defence had not yet returned a request for comment to MailOnline.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html
I know their story is based on something from "InfoWars", but the Daily Mail has been right more often than wrong on US coverage.
-
Nothing that the Oministration would do surprises me. Though, this one raises a flag--aren't the Ominions against US direct intervention? Or did I miss something?
-
Stinks of CT. The 'smoking gun' is just too good to be true.
:stoner:
-
It's worse than Infowars. Sounds like something Gordo Duff over at Veterans Today would scrape out of his skivvies.
-
Stinks of CT. The 'smoking gun' is just too good to be true.
:stoner:
Agreed.
-
I saw it late last night. I did put the InfoWars disclaimer there.
I still wouldn't put it past Obama to give tacit permission for this. We've heard the stories of Obama's administration having "off the record" talks with Iran and other countries. Talks that they wanted to keep secret.
-
I wouldn't put it past the spook community to be talking about it. I'd be surprised if actual decisionmakers outside the CIA were dumb enough to really give a blessing to it, the truth on stuff like that would almost certainly come out eventually, and there would be Hell to pay even many years later when it did.
-
I wouldn't put it past the spook community to be talking about it. I'd be surprised if actual decisionmakers outside the CIA were dumb enough to really give a blessing to it, the truth on stuff like that would almost certainly come out eventually, and there would be Hell to pay even many years later when it did.
Yes, but if someone makes a youtube video about then DU would be morally obligated to demand war crime tribunals.