The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on January 22, 2013, 09:02:15 PM

Title: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Freeper on January 22, 2013, 09:02:15 PM
Quote
muntrv (8,203 posts)

My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's whining


 
about paying 63% in taxes (if that is what he IS actually paying).

We were listening to the Valenti and Foster show on WXYT FM 97.1 in Detroit and Valenti said he agrees with Phil Mickelson. My supervisor said he agrees with Phil too and I said I don't sympathize with Phil.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022242511

What a bunch of assholes. How about we tax the DUmmies at 63% and see how much whining they will do. How many of them threw a fit over the $20 from their paychecks?

Quote
Zoeisright (7,023 posts)
2. IF he's paying 63%, which I very very much doubt

That's still $13,000,000 a year, based on $30,000,000 in endorsements and $5 million in winnings. That little ****er can't get by on a million bucks a month? What a tool.

Yeah he is acting like his money is his money.  :mental:
I can't understand the mentality of people who will cheer that people are paying more than half of their income in taxes, then have the nerve to say it still isn't enough.  :banghead:

Quote
muntrv (8,203 posts)
9. Ed Schultz just covered this right now. Says even if Phil pays 63%, he takes home $17 million.

But why bother to earn it, if most of it goes to the government? Why would anyone strive for any kind of excellence if it will be simply taken away?

Quote
lancer78 (121 posts)
13. He was including...

all taxes like state income and property taxes. He lives in California which has high taxes as well. Still a whiny butt

Let's tax you at 63% and see how you take it.

I seriously hate these idiots.

Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: NHSparky on January 22, 2013, 09:11:26 PM
Dear DUmmies...I'll put it into terms you can understand...if he quits, that's that much tax revenues the government doesn't get, meaning you don't get an EBT card to buy pot and Cheetos.

Come to think of it, that's bad how, exactly?
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 23, 2013, 04:38:55 AM


Let's tax you at 63% and see how you take it.

I seriously hate these idiots.



Tax everyone at the same rate then there can be no complaints about everyone not paying their fair share.....right DUmmies? .....right? .....right?
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Carl on January 23, 2013, 04:47:18 AM
I wish we knew what percent of non mole DUmbasses  pay virtually 0 in taxes every year and I am including property and sales tax due to their living coming from the dole...food stamps,rent assistance etc.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Mr Mannn on January 23, 2013, 04:55:28 AM
I can't understand why a supervisor would include a DUmmie in a casual conversation.
Beyond simple talking points, DUmmies are helpless in real world interactions.

Now I think about it...I can't understand a DUmmie with a job.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 23, 2013, 05:00:07 AM
Now I think about it...I can't understand a DUmmie with a job.

Still tryin' to wrap my head around that, too. :confused: :whatever:
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on January 23, 2013, 05:00:41 AM
Tax everyone at the same rate then there can be no complaints about everyone not paying their fair share.....right DUmmies? .....right? .....right?

Yep.  Fair, is fair.  Everybody the same.  Patriotic.  Economic equality.  (D)Utopia. What's the problem, Idiots?  
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 23, 2013, 05:48:01 AM
They aren't moochers; they're common, petty thieves.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Karin on January 23, 2013, 07:29:39 AM
They aren't moochers; they're common, petty thieves.

Not only that, they're lazy thieves.  They won't put any risk or skill into picking your pocket, they get someone else to do it for them.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 23, 2013, 07:39:09 AM
Not only that, they're lazy thieves.  They won't put any risk or skill into picking your pocket, they get someone else to do it for them.

To them that means they are in a supervisory position.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 23, 2013, 07:47:14 AM
To them that means they are in a supervisory position.

Those idiots couldn't supervise lemmings hitting the ground.

If they had aptitude or drive they would have displayed it decades ago.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 23, 2013, 08:17:31 AM
Those idiots couldn't supervise lemmings hitting the ground.

If they had aptitude or drive they would have displayed it decades ago.

 :lmao:....reminds me a fellow I knew years ago. He had 3 fellows working for him. They were trying to do something while I was there. They weren't having any luck and well, they were just being stupid but one of them had the right idea but the other 2 wouldn't go along with him. So the boss turns to me and says, "You know, if all three of them was up on this building and they all fell off at the same time, Hank would get lost and never hit the ground, Jack would have to stop half way down and ask directions, Fred would be the only one to hit the ground on time."
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: USA4ME on January 23, 2013, 09:07:00 AM
Quote from:
muntrv

Ed Schultz just covered this right now. Says even if Phil pays 63%, he takes home $17 million.

Why take home $17M when you can take home $30M just by relocating out of California?

Until you explain that, primitives, then all your bellyaching means nothing.

.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 23, 2013, 09:13:49 AM
Why take home $17M when you can take home $30M just by relocating out of California?

Until you explain that, primitives, then all your bellyaching means nothing.

They will explain that they are entitled to take 90% of everything he owns for daring to leave.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 23, 2013, 09:20:29 AM
If DUmmies are to lazy to get a job for money.....maybe they should take up playing golf.

Hell, Obama passed out foodstamps and free phones, why not free memberships at the country club.....just not the one the elitist democrats belong to of course.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Gina on January 23, 2013, 09:22:35 AM
Quote
Zoeisright (7,023 posts)
2. IF he's paying 63%, which I very very much doubt

That's still $13,000,000 a year, based on $30,000,000 in endorsements and $5 million in winnings. That little ****er can't get by on a million bucks a month? What a tool.

This asshole above is NOT AN AMERICAN.  What a dumb entitled piece of filth.  She thinks it's okay for the gov't to decide what one can live on a month but it can't  decide if abortion is wrong?  OMG  :loser:
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: jukin on January 23, 2013, 11:09:20 AM
Well if Phil does drop out then a person from another country can take up in his place and all of the tax money goes out of country. Tiger Woods said he moved out of kalifornia because of the high taxes. Not a one of the low IQers will say anything against a half black man doing it. Racism is a trait of the low IQers.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: wasp69 on January 23, 2013, 01:42:04 PM
Quote
Zoeisright (7,023 posts)
2. IF he's paying 63%, which I very very much doubt

That's still $13,000,000 a year, based on $30,000,000 in endorsements and $5 million in winnings. That little ****er can't get by on a million bucks a month? What a tool.

Since Mikelson has decided to "go Galt", that's a big ol' fat 0% of the rich man that you will be getting.  No money for your rainbows and unicorns, retard.  Mikelson can afford to do that, he's earned enough to where he doesn't have to keep getting raped to pay for your free shit.

Do you think you envious, selfish, greedy little pigs can survive without his tax money?  I'll bet you can't.  Think he's the only one that's had enough?  I'll bet he's not.  Maybe you should think about how you can create more sources of tax revenue instead of strangling the ones you already have?  Nah! Too much like work, doesn't require hatred to accomplish, takes away too much time from DU.

You filthy little ****s make me sick, DUmmie.  If it were up to me, a majority of you malingerers would starve in the dark while the resources went to people who truly needed help. 

I'm looking forward to California's projected revenue losses and the inevitable democrat circle jerk that will follow.  None of them will figure out how their tax hikes proved Newton's Third Law of Motion - for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.  Wealth is portable, we can't sustain you lazy shits forever, and Phil has had it with your shit.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Rebel on January 23, 2013, 02:15:48 PM
Quote
okwmember (102 posts)

All I could think is what bullshit. First off he must play with many Europeans who pay far more in taxes than Phil does.

And a ton of'em live in Florida, DUmbass.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: GOBUCKS on January 23, 2013, 02:24:06 PM
And a ton of'em live in Florida, DUmbass.
One article I read about last summer's Ryder Cup matches said that after the Europeans finished their victory celebrations, they all got on their private jets to head back home to Florida.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: delilahmused on January 23, 2013, 04:31:24 PM
I shouldn't be surprised anymore about how stupid and vindictive they are but I am. The principle of the situation escapes them entirely. And each little one of those selfish pigs knows damn well if they were in the same situation they'd do the same thing.

Cindie
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Duke Nukum on January 23, 2013, 05:11:48 PM
I can't understand why a supervisor would include a DUmmie in a casual conversation.
Beyond simple talking points, DUmmies are helpless in real world interactions.

Now I think about it...I can't understand a DUmmie with a job.
Obviously a mole.

If it was a 100% real DUmmie it would have been a post about how it lost its job today.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 24, 2013, 04:22:37 AM
If it was a 100% real DUmmie it would have been a post about how it lost its job today.

Probably over an argument about Mickelson, and Tiger Woods leaving California due to high taxes.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2266830/Tiger-Woods-admits-left-California-tax-rates.html
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: Wineslob on January 24, 2013, 09:34:46 AM
So, DUmmies, should you make sure that John Effin Kerry is paying HIS "fair share"? He's worth (subjective) 178 MILLION.
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: GOBUCKS on January 24, 2013, 10:28:01 AM
So, DUmmies, should you make sure that John Effin Kerry is paying HIS "fair share"? He's worth (subjective) 178 MILLION.

Is that all his, or is it Ta-raaaazzz-ah's money?
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: 67 Rover on January 24, 2013, 11:33:00 AM
So, DUmmies, should you make sure that John Effin Kerry is paying HIS "fair share"? He's worth (subjective) 178 MILLION.

He still has not yet payed the taxes on his yacht in Newport R.I.  :argh:
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: delilahmused on January 24, 2013, 03:14:16 PM
Is that all his, or is it Ta-raaaazzz-ah's money?

When you add in hers (I heard on Rush this morning his personal wealth is around 190-something) they outdo Romney (whose worth is about 250) is more than double. It's okay, though because instead of having bank accounts in the Cayman's, he puts his in family trusts so they won't be taxed.

Cindie
Title: Re: My supervisor could not understand why I don't sympathize with Phil Mikelson's w
Post by: RobJohnson on January 24, 2013, 03:29:22 PM
Mickelson is a ***** and someone got to him. He had to say he was sorry.