nadinbrzezinski (115,173 posts)
41. And demiled
You are talking a tank, demiled.
That's the way it is.
You are talking a fighter, demiled, B-24 Demiled.
Yup.
M-60 is not an M-4 Chafee.
Oh and in certain states...you are highly discouraged from having an M-60 by State Law. They do not belong in civilian hands anyway.
nadinbrzezinski (115,173 posts)
56. Hmm hmmm I guess it's time to transform
CONUS into a real combat zone. And it is not allowed in some states. That is owning body armor, and police departments buy it.
You guys will do all you can to not restrict anything. So let me make it crystal clear. The AR platform, or the Ak for that matter, do not belong in civilian hands.
Is that clear enough? There are plenty of older weapons that are more than sufficient for hunting and home defense, really.
The AR or the Ak, or any future platform deriving from new research military platforms, to cover our asses, does not belong in civilian hands.
Now if you somehow manage to drop the effective ROF to one a second, a round a second, sure...it can. Limit your magazines to hunting legal...sure. So it is nothing personal to looks. You want to own a macho looking gun that is not going to do what it does, no detachable magazine, no ability to change parts so it can chamber other ammo, none of that nonesense...be my guest.
In many ways people have had it with the minority of the minority that want nothing to change. And I say this as a gun owner.
So you understand this now? This is where most of us are. We want an AWB...period.
nadinbrzezinski (115,173 posts)
60. Simple...the right to life, the right to assemble.
Is also protected. I really am tired of having to think what if...somebody brings an assault rifle to a theater. I really am tired of thinking about every time we get an emergency involving gun play that t may be another mass shooting.
You want to hunt, by all means, you do not need an AR-15 or an Ak or any future weapon.
Relevant my ass. When even retired Generals tell you they have no place in the civilian word, time for you or wake the **** up, or not.
And this will not stop hunting, or competitive shooting. Speaking of that, have you looked at what is used in Olympic sports? Nope, not an AR or an AK. Care to think WHY?
None is telling you not to hunt...none s telling you anything. Just that we need to balance public safety and the RIGHT TO ASSEMBLE...with the second Ammendment. I can't scream fire in a theater. I cannot state falsehoods on a private individual...why care tell me should there not be limits on your precious? Once your rights conflict with mine, that is the point where regulations are needed
NO RIGHT IS ABSOLUTE...understand this? Or civics was not your strong point.
OneTenthofOnePercent (6,131 posts)
61. The 2A is not absolute. There are numerous weapons restrictions. Most are reasonable.
There is a right to life and to assemble. Who is threatening that? And before you say massed shooters armed with WMDs or whatever, those acts (murder and assault) are illegal so that right there is proof of the victims' rights being violated.
There were no standing armies when our country formed, so if the founders 2nd amendment intent was to ensure that The People had the means to form an effective well regulated Militia when called upon... then the assumption would be that to form an effective well regulated Militia, The People would have to show up weapons expected to be commonly used by infantry (or else risk being ineffective and ill-regulated).
And what weapons are used at the infantry/insurgent level? Well, nowadays it's the AR and AK and other assault-style rifles. Any modern effective well regulated Militia DOES use these items. So in order for The People to be able to form an effective well regulated militia, The People's right to keep and bear militia-effective arms must not be infringed.
This is what happens when nads posts drunk, people. Spelling worse even than usual.
I'm wondering why her editors don't just send her around to do cat shows ala Veronica Corningstone.
nadinbrzezinski (115,173 posts)Unless, of course, you are talking about the right to an abortion. ::)
60.
NO RIGHT IS ABSOLUTE...understand this? Or civics was not your strong point.
She got kicked out of the cat show. She showed up in firefighter's turnout gear and body armor, with the 10 inch Bowie knife on her belt.
I think she means demiled as in "Suffice it to say, Supperman demiled the worlds entire nucular arms capability by launching all of the warheads in to the sun. He will be coming after the NRA's riffles next."
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2225355
What is this "demiled" she speaks of?
Now I ask you - how did Nads "NO RIGHT IS ABSOLUTE" of arc get passed over for 2012 DOTY award?
Since the announcement of this award - has any of the winner's posts been brought over? RECOUNT!!!
The rough translation into English is: I am a babbling idiot, but I pretend to know everything with much condescension.
The world needs to be denadined.
When coach finishes with Pam Dawson and WC Green, that's his next assignment, if he agrees to accept it.
The only downside being, how would coach hear the tape before it self-destructs?
Frank is so awesome that he just miracles sound into his head. And forget all of the "this tape will self-destruct in 5 seconds" bull. The tape will self-destruct when frank tells it to self-destruct.
M-60 is not an M-4 Chafee.
There is no such thing, even if you spelled the good general's name correctly and eliminated the unnecessary hyphens from your defective stab at US military nomenclature, you stupid pompous butterball.