The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: FlippyDoo on January 18, 2013, 08:43:52 AM
-
The DUmp has a hatred of guns. Why?
-
None of the above.
DUmmies hate gun because they know we will shoot their ass if they try to force Marxism in America.
-
I don't think it is so much that they hate the COTUS..they do but only thiink about it whennecessary. I REALLY BELIEVE that dummies are more like the BORG and GROUP THINK is the only way they can survive
-
The DUmp has a hatred of guns. Why?
I said all of the above, but I do have one minor quibble. The DUmbasses love parts of the Constitution, namely the First Amendment (so long as it applies only to them) and the Fourth and Fifth (as long as it keeps the cops out of their weed and Cheetos stash.) Other than that though, yeah, they hate it.
-
None of the above.
DUmmies hate gun because they know we will shoot their ass if they try to force Marxism in America.
Tuck,
I think that would fall under: People with guns can protect themselves from loopy liberals
-
Easily "All of the above," and one can add a whole bunch more reasons why (and not name them all).
-
They hate guns because they are emotionally-driven morons. More "kids" are killed in Barryland every 2-3 months than were killed at Sandy Hook and those f'n idiots don't say a damn thing about that. If they did, and and looked at it logically, they'd realize the errors of their ways into creating a damn cradle to grave mentality class of citizens. ...but they aren't logical creatures. It's their lack of logic that makes them hate guns. It's the newest shiny object being shown to them by their handlers. Think about everything else they want banned. Those thoughts don't get their on their own. They are "planted" in the idiots heads by the handlers. Sodas, SUV's, light bulbs, etc. They're meant to be ruled.
-
Tuck,
I think that would fall under: People with guns can protect themselves from loopy liberals
OK
I read that as the use of a gun in a defensive confrontation. I think that moonbats hate guns because they're afraid that we'll be the aggressors, making DUmmies an endangered species.
Every time I read a DUmmy wanting to split the nation into two separate countries, I agree with it. We could then attack them and take over their country, enslaving them. They would capitulate faster than Poland did when attacked by Germany.
We could have it all and they know it.
-
I'm with BSS - too bad the last choice wasn't "All that and more."
-
Deep down they know that their dream world can`t happen without it being enforced (as always in the past) by the point of a gun from the government.
An armed public stands in the way of that as seen in the past week and it infuriates them.
As they always do,they ball their little fists up and beat the air in impotent tantrums.
-
They hate guns because they are emotionally-driven morons. More "kids" are killed in Barryland every 2-3 months than were killed at Sandy Hook and those f'n idiots don't say a damn thing about that. If they did, and and looked at it logically, they'd realize the errors of their ways into creating a damn cradle to grave mentality class of citizens. ...but they aren't logical creatures. It's their lack of logic that makes them hate guns. It's the newest shiny object being shown to them by their handlers. Think about everything else they want banned. Those thoughts don't get their on their own. They are "planted" in the idiots heads by the handlers. Sodas, SUV's, light bulbs, etc. They're meant to be ruled.
I guess out of all of the answers Rebel has it nailed on the head. They think with emotions, knee jerk reactions to everything and put logic right out the door.
-
I agree with Rebel and Carl. Well-said, both of you.
Rebel
They hate guns because they are emotionally-driven morons.
Carl
Deep down they know that their dream world can`t happen without it being enforced (as always in the past) by the point of a gun from the government.
-
I chose "All of the Above" as well. All of the possible choices apply, but most of the options are dependent upon Option #4: "They are lemmings and their Leader have instructed them to hate guns", in my opinion. Not a one of them is intelligent enough to formulate an opinion all their own, let alone be able to defend it without resorting to ad hominem attacks and invective. If it weren't for talking points from their political masters, most of them would be oblivious to the fact that Guns even exist in the universe - well, outside of a movie screen, anyway, and the ones that would be aware of firearms would have suck-started - or some other, equally stupid equivalent action - one long ago.
-
I went with all of the above but "They are lemmings, and their leaders have instructed them to hate guns" is the winner by a mile.
They all pretty much meet the clinical definition of "Imbecile"; "A person of moderate to severe mental retardation having a mental age of from three to seven years and generally being capable of some degree of communication and performance of simple tasks under supervision." The DUches go along with what they think will make them look more intelligent in complete and total herd behavior.
-
Can I vote twice? :???: :whistling:
-
Can I vote twice? :???: :whistling:
No. Sadly enough, multiple voting is only allowed if you are a democrat.
-
Too them the Constitution should be a blank piece of paper filled in as they see fit when they see fit...
-
Too them the Constitution should be a blank piece of paper filled in as they see fit when they see fit...
I think they see it more as a living, breathing document...
that's made out of silly putty to be twisted to their current desires.
-
http://theacru.org/acru/harvard_study_gun_control_is_counterproductive/
Harvard Study: Gun Control Is Counterproductive
I've just learned that Washington, D.C.'s petition for a rehearing of the Parker case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit was denied today. This is good news. Readers will recall in this case that the D.C. Circuit overturned the decades-long ban on gun ownership in the nation's capitol on Second Amendment grounds.
However, as my colleague Peter Ferrara explained in his National Review Online article following the initial decision in March, it looks very likely that the United States Supreme Court will take the case on appeal. When it does so - beyond seriously considering the clear original intent of the Second Amendment to protect an individual's right to armed self-defense - the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court would be wise to take into account the findings of a recent study out of Harvard.
The study, which just appeared in Volume 30, Number 2 of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (pp. 649-694), set out to answer the question in its title: "Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide? A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence." Contrary to conventional wisdom, and the sniffs of our more sophisticated and generally anti-gun counterparts across the pond, the answer is "no." And not just no, as in there is no correlation between gun ownership and violent crime, but an emphatic no, showing a negative correlation: as gun ownership increases, murder and suicide decreases.
The findings of two criminologists - Prof. Don Kates and Prof. Gary Mauser - in their exhaustive study of American and European gun laws and violence rates, are telling:
Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not. The study found that the nine European nations with the lowest rates of gun ownership (5,000 or fewer guns per 100,000 population) have a combined murder rate three times higher than that of the nine nations with the highest rates of gun ownership (at least 15,000 guns per 100,000 population).
For example, Norway has the highest rate of gun ownership in Western Europe, yet possesses the lowest murder rate. In contrast, Holland's murder rate is nearly the worst, despite having the lowest gun ownership rate in Western Europe. Sweden and Denmark are two more examples of nations with high murder rates but few guns. As the study's authors write in the report:
Good study, bammy grad from there, maybe he should read it...
-
All the above. They are the useful idiots we all know and despise. They have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to using guns in a lawful manner and they don't care. It's all about what the MSN and the party tell them it is.
-
The Dear Leader told them it was bad, and naturally they'll blindly follow the DL! Morons.
-
I voted all of the above.
It's not about guns at all. From birth to death they want to control us. :argh:
(http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1205/gun-control-isnt-about-guns-guns-politics-1338163827.jpg)