Elizabeth Warren, Comanche-In-Chief!
OK...so you assume it's HRC or defeat. Sad.
[You know what makes me sad? You do! Maybe we should chug on over to I'm-a-DUmmie Land, where maybe we can find some reality for you, ya jackwagon!]
Ugh!
[Is that you, Elizabeth Warren?]
Response to democrattotheend (Reply #64)Cesar Chavez? What's the calender say? :mental:
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 12:24 AM
Ken Burch (30,136 posts)
99. I still don't understand why most of RFK's kids backed HRC.
She didn't care about ANY of the things Bobby lived and died for-she would never have gone to tarpaper shacks in Mississippi and held dying children in her arms, OR supported Cesar Chavez and the UFW. The dispossessed never mattered to her...they couldn't have mattered to her if she was willing to be on the WalMart B.O.D.
Ken Burch (30,136 posts)
75. There's a clear mood, a growing mood, against corporate domination of life
And the public are sick of the wars...there's no massive majority for staying in Afghanistan or anywhere else in the Middle East.
And the polls have always shown majority support for single-payer.
regjoe (85 posts)
79. Give it a try
IMHO though, you are only seeing what you believe people want and ignoring what they do not want.
Afghanistan will not be a huge factor in the next election.
Polls that show support for single-payer have also shown no support for being taxed to pay for it.
Progressive gun control laws will be rejected by a great many of Democrats.
Unions do not have the support they once had.
Most Americans do not feel "dominated" by corporations. The lack of support for OWS and it fading away is proof of that.
From the DUmmie thread. . . .
Warren has a net worth of $14.5 million. . . .
That heap big wampum! How did Princess Cherryblossoms get so rich? I thought she was just some sort of professor at Harvard. What, did she open her own casino?