The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on January 02, 2013, 08:01:07 PM
-
graham4anything (3,598 posts)
Let's repeal the 22nd amendment, or at least amend it (the term limit one)
starting immediately.
and if not repealing it, let's allow ALL presidents past and present, to return after say 10 or 15 years.
Especially as the founding fathers did not intend to have term limits and it was only done as a jealous act by the repubs, who instantly regretted doing it as Ike and Reagan could have possibly won 3rd terms.
(and so could Bill Clinton in 2000).
As we have IMHO the singular best president we are ever going to get from this day forward, and with people living longer, and all that.
While it is on the state level- we should do
Like Jerry Brown did as Governor, both the youngest and oldest, and the best governor of California ever.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022120342
Oh God no we will barely survive 8 years under the preezy we do not need him coming back in 20 years to finish the damage. :banghead:
-
Aw, the graham cracker primitive's trying to campaign for Top DUmmie of 2013.
Someone please tell him it's way too early.
-
And so it begins.......
-
As usual the DUmmies are late to the party.
How's this for indoctrination of our youth?
http://teacher.scholastic.com/scholasticnews/indepth/upfront/debate/index.asp?article=d0424
http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/109669/eight-more-years-the-case-removing-term-limits#
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/11/1169013/-Time-to-repeal-the-22nd-Amendment
The left really wants The Chicago Jesus to be Emperor for Life.
-
The left really wants The Chicago Jesus to be Emperor for Life.
Are you kidding? Obama is in the perfect position to get it too. I won't be surprised if he gets another term. It's already sinking into mainstream discussions, not only on uber liberal boards and websites. Believe me, by 2015 there will be serious discussions about this.
If studying politics has taught me one thing, crazy is the norm! So what seems crazy now, and what appears like it will never happen now, won't be crazy in the very very near future.
-
As usual the DUmmies are late to the party.
How's this for indoctrination of our youth?
http://teacher.scholastic.com/scholasticnews/indepth/upfront/debate/index.asp?article=d0424
http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/109669/eight-more-years-the-case-removing-term-limits#
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/11/1169013/-Time-to-repeal-the-22nd-Amendment
The left really wants The Chicago Jesus to be Emperor for Life.
If that were to happen, him becoming emperor for life, it would be a short reign.
-
"Chicago Jesus."
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Damn, you're good.
-
Are you kidding? Obama is in the perfect position to get it too. I won't be surprised if he gets another term. It's already sinking into mainstream discussions, not only on uber liberal boards and websites. Believe me, by 2015 there will be serious discussions about this.
They can discuss it all day long, but when it comes down to it, there are enough red states that would make ratification of repealing the amendment impossible.
The only way he will serve a day beyond Jan 20th of 2017 (or whatever day it will be in 2017) will be if he and his party ignores the Constitution and if he tried to pull a stunt that like I doubt he would survive the rest of that day.
-
"Chicago Jesus."
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Damn, you're good.
Not mine. I'm sure it's been used on this board several times.
-
Someone needs to 'DUmb down' the way the Amendment process works, so this primitive might understand why his idea is never going to materialize.
-
Someone needs to 'DUmb down' the way the Amendment process works, so this primitive might understand why his idea is never going to materialize.
How's this, you can't ****ing do it. :-)
-
Venezuela will be looking for a new socialist messiah pretty soon.
Down there you can declare yourself president for life.
-
How's this, you can't ****ing do it. :-)
Thats a start - :-)
I would add some 'percussive reinforcement' to your notion, in the form of a smack upside the primitive's head.
-
Thats a start - :-)
I would add some 'percussive reinforcement' to your notion, in the form of a smack upside the primitive's head.
I'm not a violent man, but dammit if I wouldn't love to smack a primitive or 12.
-
Actually, what I am hearing in my libtard circles is that they are already planning to talk about how this amendment wasn't in the original constitution. Though it was a formal tradition until a democrat FDR broke it again. So, it's pretty clear what this power grabby President will do.
-
Actually, what I am hearing in my libtard circles is that they are already planning to talk about how this amendment wasn't in the original constitution. Though it was a formal tradition until a democrat FDR broke it again. So, it's pretty clear what this power grabby President will do.
That's not good. It's a short step from DU to MSNBC to Harry Reid or Dickhead Durbin.
Don't believe me? Look for yourself. They would make Stalin smile.
-
Someone needs to 'DUmb down' the way the Amendment process works, so this primitive might understand why his idea is never going to materialize.
DUmbing down the way the amendment process works would be like trying to transmit the entire Webster's Unabridged Dictionary in Morse code, in one sitting.
-
That's not good. It's a short step from DU to MSNBC to Harry Reid or Dickhead Durbin.
Don't believe me? Look for yourself. They would make Stalin smile.
They're going to blame it on the Republicans again!
-
Actually, what I am hearing in my libtard circles is that they are already planning to talk about how this amendment wasn't in the original constitution. Though it was a formal tradition until a democrat FDR broke it again. So, it's pretty clear what this power grabby President will do.
So, uh, which amendments were in the original constitution?
Why do you suppose they're called "amendments"?
-
They're going to blame it on the Republicans again!
ooo-kay. I was expecting a little more. You know, rational debate and all that.
-
So, uh, which amendments were in the original constitution?
Why do you suppose they're called "amendments"?
Well. DUmmies are against the 1st and 2nd amendments, and they wouldn't care if Obama kicked open everyone's front door to take their weapons, (4th), and the 13th(?), they want to keep blacks on their plantations. So, I would guess that most of the amendments could be done away with and the DUmmies would be happy.
-
So, uh, which amendments were in the original constitution?
Very true. Good point.
-
Aw, the graham cracker primitive's trying to campaign for Top DUmmie of 2013.
Someone please tell him it's way too early.
Don't even get started on graham crackers anti gun rants.
-
Actually, what I am hearing in my libtard circles is that they are already planning to talk about how this amendment wasn't in the original constitution. Though it was a formal tradition until a democrat FDR broke it again. So, it's pretty clear what this power grabby President will do.
There are several amendments that are not part of the original constitution. So if we use their logic we can deny women the right to vote, we can bring back slavery and a whole bunch of other things. Friggin idiots.
-
So, uh, which amendments were in the original constitution?
Why do you suppose they're called "amendments"?
Lol. Hi-5.
-
You know...I said in another thread that I couldn't see this happening...but if 44 manages to at least partially subvert the 2nd Amendment this could become a more realistic scenario.
I'd be willing to bet he's already got "experts" looking to see if there is some loophole or leglese they can throw at us to show why he can ignore the rules.
-
graham4anything (3,598 posts)
Let's repeal the 22nd amendment, or at least amend it (the term limit one)
starting immediately.
and if not repealing it, let's allow ALL presidents past and present, to return after say 10 or 15 years.
Especially as the founding fathers did not intend to have term limits and it was only done as a jealous act by the repubs, who instantly regretted doing it as Ike and Reagan could have possibly won 3rd terms.
(and so could Bill Clinton in 2000).
As we have IMHO the singular best president we are ever going to get from this day forward, and with people living longer, and all that.
While it is on the state level- we should do
Like Jerry Brown did as Governor, both the youngest and oldest, and the best governor of California ever.
Boy, won't THEY be shocked when W wins another term! :-)
-
Settle down, not even the DUmmies are going for graham cracker's idea. Some of them actually thought beyond square one, in that someone may get in that they don't like. And incumbents are hard to boot out. Damned hard.
Response to graham4anything (Original post)
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 08:22 PM
HereSince1628 (25,155 posts)
4. If i were to change it, it'd be in a differnt direction
As in preventing family dynasties.
Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #4)
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 11:05 PM
graham4anything (3,612 posts)
11. You mean penalize all women, just because they happen to be married? That would be sexist.
and do you mean people like Al Gore, Jerry Brown, FDR, JFK, and of course RFK and Teddy Kennedy?
Why should Malia Obama be penalized for something her father did?
:lmao:
-
Now that the democrats have their Stalin/Hitler in place, they want to keep him there......and he wants to stay, so look out.
-
Boy, won't THEY be shocked when W wins another term! :-)
That is what I thought of as I was reading the previous posts
-
That's so over-the-top that if it hadn't been posted by a proven moonbat with thousands of posts, they'd all be calling him a mole.
-
Aw, the graham cracker primitive's trying to campaign for Top DUmmie of 2013.
Someone please tell him it's way too early.
Looks like it. We shall see....................
To Be Continued?
-
That's so over-the-top that if it hadn't been posted by a proven moonbat with thousands of posts, they'd all be calling him a mole.
I don't think Graham is a mole. It could be possible thought, but not likely.