The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on December 26, 2012, 07:16:23 PM
-
nadinbrzezinski (114,141 posts)
42. The 30.06 is larger
View profile
The problem with the NATO round is the other things that it does when it hits..see cavitation...
But the round is all but that large for a rifle round.
All the wonderful things one learns when trying not to get hit at shootouts...
Also the 30.06 has a greater effective range than the NATO round.
nadinbrzezinski (114,141 posts)
104. It can
View profile
Some of the rifles in question are 30.06
Little knowledge goes a long way. Some AR type weapons are chambered for it
nadinbrzezinski (114,141 posts)
122. You mean nobody uses an M1 Garand in Minnesota
View profile
To hunt deer?
Or for that matter any other 30.06 chambered deer rifle?
What is illegal for hunting is, like California, the extended magazine. States have actually put a limit how many rounds you carry on you when you go hunting. The Garand is very much hunting legal.
What is illegal is the 30 round magazine.
(For the record, the Garand does not use detachable magazines either)
As I said, a little knowledge. Not because the gunnies will not go crazy if you call a clip a magazine and vice versa, they have and will continue to do such.
But seriously, both rounds are hunting legal across the United States.
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10022071704?com=search#post42
Nads no longer supports gun ownership? When did that happen?
-
Water is wet, fire is hot.
Must remember, gNads is schooling the unwashed primitives, that still think sticks are high tech weaponry.
We should paint all sticks black and watch the DUmp go into ban-stick mode. :whistling:
-
I have yet to see one of them .30-06 ARs, she must be farther along the arc than me.
:popcorn:
-
Nads and gun knowledge
(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/thimble.jpg)
-
nadinbrzezinski (114,141 posts)
42. The 30.06 is larger
View profile
The problem with the NATO round is the other things that it does when it hits..see cavitation...
But the round is all but that large for a rifle round.
All the wonderful things one learns when trying not to get hit at shootouts...
Also the 30.06 has a greater effective range than the NATO round.
Let's pretend that these pretend shootouts were actually real. She learned all about guns while trying not to get hit at these shootouts.
I had a job back when I was 19 years old in which I had to do work on a busy 5 lane street (4 traffic lanes and 1 turn lane). I had to try not to get hit by all the cars that were zipping by on the street. I guess, based on nads example, I should now be able to do all of my own auto mechanic work.
-
Obviously, part of this is a C&P job.
I know this because rifle is spelled correctly.
-
Obviously, part of this is a C&P job.
I know this because rifle is spelled correctly.
I believe most all of what she said comes from wikipedia. I think in the past that we've given her too much credit when we've said that she's nadined (Googled) something. I've come to the conclusion that Googling is too much like work to her. She just goes to wikipedia. It's like one stop shopping for her.
I've also come to the conclusion that if she really did know everything that she claims to know the collective sets of Encyclopedia Britannica and Encyclopedia Americana would hold their heads in shame for knowing so much less than the nads. Even Einstein, Tesla, and Edison would climb out of their graves to bow down to her far superior knowledge.
-
Some DUmmy should point out that a AR platform riffle has never been chambered for a .30-06. 7.62 X 51 replaced the 06 as a military cartridge and it is in a AR10 platform.
-
Maybe the .30-06 AR riffle is a Mexican thing, like potato oles.
(http://bargainbriana.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/taco-johns.jpg)
-
Some DUmmy should point out that a AR platform riffle has never been chambered for a .30-06. 7.62 X 51 replaced the 06 as a military cartridge and it is in a AR10 platform.
Maybe Nads is confusing the AR with a BAR and just thinks the "B" is silent...and invisible.
-
Bravo to you for being able to actually type nads and knowledge in the same sentence. :rotf:
-
This little exchange caught my eye.
Response to Odin2005 (Original post)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 01:35 AM
azurnoir (22,196 posts)
45. with all do respect according to Minnesota hunting laws duck hunters can only have 12 shells
on their person so your scenario would be illegal in any event
eta your allowed to load 4 times thats1 shell in the chamber and 2 in the magazine * 4
the type of gun you are speaking of here is also illegal to hunt ducks with a rifle would make no sense anyway there'd be nothing left of the duck, it is shotgun only
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to azurnoir (Reply #45)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 08:10 PM
PavePusher (15,239 posts)
225. Ummm, citation for that 12-rounds, please? Now you've done it, you hater.
Never heard that one before.
3-rounds-in-the-gun limit is a Federal law for hunting migratory birds. true
One could hunt water-fowl with an AR, but I'd want a scope good enough to do head shots... and you can't shoot them sitting on the water anyway, so moot point.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to PavePusher (Reply #225)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 08:26 PM
azurnoir (22,196 posts)
229. here from the mn dnr
Hunting Restrictions
• Hunters are limited to 12 shells per trip in possession.
• Within one hour of hunt completion, each party must return their entry
permit to the check station and report number of geese harvested.
• Waterfowl and small game hunters must have guns unloaded and cased
except within 10 feet of assigned hunting stations.
• Hunters are limited to one trip to the blinds before noon, and one trip after
noon, per day
http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/rlp/regulations/hunting/2012/waterfowl.pdf
DUmpmonkey fails to mention that those restrictions only apply to Controlled Hunting Zones which number exactly six. (They're small, too.)
Of those six, only two, have the 12 shell limit.
Idiot is playing with smoke and mirrors and not being honest.
-
Maybe Nads is confusing the AR with a BAR and just thinks the "B" is silent...and invisible.
She's stupid enough, that she just might have Eugene Stoner AND John Moses Browning as a reception committee when she reaches the Pearly Gates. Maybe Dr. Richard Gatling on the committee as well, just to round things out.
-
She's stupid enough, that she just might have Eugene Stoner AND John Moses Browning as a reception committee when she reaches the Pearly Gates. Maybe Dr. Richard Gatling on the committee as well, just to round things out.
I don't think so.
-
I don't think so.
I didn't say she'd pass THROUGH the Pearly Gates; just that she'd reach 'em. :popcorn:
-
Response to azurnoir (Reply #45)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 08:10 PM
PavePusher (15,239 posts)
225. Ummm, citation for that 12-rounds, please? Now you've done it, you hater.
Never heard that one before.
3-rounds-in-the-gun limit is a Federal law for hunting migratory birds.
Not around here on Table Rock Lake in the SW Missouri Ozarks. Canadian Geese are a pest, nusance, and health hazard. They shit all over the place while on their migration stops. Kill 'em all! (http://www.conservativecave.com/Smileys/default/rant.jpg)
-
I didn't say she'd pass THROUGH the Pearly Gates; just that she'd reach 'em. :popcorn:
I say that all DUmmies, moles excluded, will have the formalities waved and just catch the next downward express.
-
She's stupid enough, that she just might have Eugene Stoner AND John Moses Browning as a reception committee when she reaches the Pearly Gates. Maybe Dr. Richard Gatling on the committee as well, just to round things out.
One would hope that Mikhail Kalashnikov would be there (he is still with us) to kick her square in the ass. Lord knows that would be an ample target.
-
One would hope that Mikhail Kalashnikov would be there (he is still with us) to kick her square in the ass. Lord knows that would be an ample target.
I got this sneaking suspicion that - just like the weapon that bears his name - you'd have to drive a stake through Mikhail Kalashnikov's heart in order to get him to move along to Valhalla. This was the biggest reason I didn't include him in the welcome committee.
-
I got this sneaking suspicion that - just like the weapon that bears his name - you'd have to drive a stake through Mikhail Kalashnikov's heart in order to get him to move along to Valhalla. This was the biggest reason I didn't include him in the welcome committee.
One would hope he got the chance to do it while they are both still alive and someone has the good rig to capture the image. Alas he is in his 90's and shows no sign of slowing down. They do make them tough over there.
-
One could hunt water-fowl with an AR, but I'd want a scope good enough to do head shots... and you can't shoot them sitting on the water anyway
One could hunt waterfowl, not water-fowl, with an AR, if one were okay with violating a Federal law.
The deal about head shots is ludicrous.
With a legal firearm, one often must shoot cripples on the water, especially in the wake of the stupid Federal law prohibiting lead shot for waterfowl.
Very few hunters would shoot a healthy bird on the water because it defeats the purpose of waterfowl hunting, but I've never heard of it being illegal.
-
One could hunt water-fowl with an AR, but I'd want a scope good enough to do head shots... and you can't shoot them sitting on the water anyway
Unlike shot, which has a limited range, the bullet from a center fire riffle will continue on its path after exiting the deceased Ducks head.
There is a reason why certain types of firearms are prohibited in certain areas.
In MI, no center fire riffles below Bay City.
-
Not around here on Table Rock Lake in the SW Missouri Ozarks. Canadian Geese are a pest, nusance, and health hazard. They shit all over the place while on their migration stops. Kill 'em all! (http://www.conservativecave.com/Smileys/default/rant.jpg)
You mean like Democrats?
-
I went and looked on Google and there is someone that will make an AR in 30.06.
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2332794
It's made by Cobb but the link to thier site is down right now.
http://www.cobb50.com/mcr.htm
-
Point being, it's not a common caliber for an AR, although don't tell that to nads.
-
Point being, it's not a common caliber for an AR, although don't tell that to nads.
Agreed