The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on December 15, 2012, 01:13:31 PM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021990833
At lease this DUmmie is honest about stealing rights of the people.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 01:01 PM
quinnox (14,143 posts)
Confiscate most guns in the country, and how it could be done
All guns must be licensed or would be considered illegal and a felony crime. There would be a grace period where people could voluntarily surrender their guns and get some form of monetary compensation, perhaps a tax break. After the grace period ended, hard-ass strict laws and rules would go into effect. In order to get a gun license, a full background investigation would be undergone and conducted, including a mental evaluation by a medical professional. Any warning signs or shaky background elements would disqualify the person from getting the gun license. And to procure a license would have to be for legitimate reasons such as necessary hunting or being in the military and having a weapon or being in some kind of security service or other kinds of reasons. You couldn't just own a gun "for the hell of it". Violations of having an unlicensed gun would be fully prosecuted and a serious offense.
Don't tell me it couldn't be done, because it could be. We went to the moon for gods sake, we could begin a gun round up and be successful. It would take time, but it would not be an impossible task.
librechik (24,436 posts)
2. There would be the added benefit of thousands of angry freepers dying while resisting confiscation
at least that is how they imagine it would happen. Although I guess they wouldn't necessarily think of it as a positive result. That's just me. And of course I'm just kidding.
of course you are.
quinnox (14,143 posts)
5. if a few Waco style confrontations/occurances happened, then so be it
it would be high profile and demonstrate the government wasn't kidding about this new policy.
:banghead:
-
Thugs and goons. DU doesn't seem so much interested in some rights as others... so much for the equal protection clause.
-
Yes lets just toss out everyone's rights that you don't like and see how long the rest are left when you neo nazi wannabes get done.
-
How about we ban idiots instead of guns?
-
300 million guns. At least a million people who would resist. There is not a sane man who would sign up to take guns away from an armed people..
-
They wouuld try. Well, THEY wouldn't try. DUmmies are penultimate cowards. They would not put their fat asses on the line for anything they claim to believe. They wouldn't hesitate to try and find some goons to do it for them, but they wouldn't do it themsleves.
They're real problem is that a lot of states would have governments openly hostile to the government in Washington. I wonder what the DUmmies would try then. They can't even get their health care program implemented and they know it.
-
rDigital (2,154 posts)
17. 25 children were murdered at Waco. Cool plan. nt
But that's OK. They weren't moonbat children [/DU mode off]
quinnox (14,148 posts)
20. I'm not endorsing Waco, just being prepared for the reality that some of
View profile
the militia types would probably force a confrontation like this. Its regrettable, but a likely scenario to happen.
More likely is a bunch of liberals would get shot then we would have total control of the country.
rDigital (2,154 posts)
26. Regrettable? Does that mean acceptable instead of absolutely horrifying? Killing more children? nt
quinnox (14,148 posts)
32. no, it would be a terrible event but the blame would of course be placed squarely
View profile
on the militia types or crazed paranoid government haters that provoked such a confrontation. I would hope they would at least have the decency to evacuate their kids before doing something like this.
Saboburns (709 posts)
63. You've dug yerself a hole.
Stop digging.
:lol:
-
Worked great for the Germans in the 1930's...
The same people who claim Hitler wasn't a socialist sure love parroting his policies, don't they?
-
Saboburns (709 posts)
63. You've dug yerself a hole.
Stop digging.
Replying to whom?
The jug-eared muslim probably has at least a few advisors recommending something similar.
-
Do these assholes realize that hard drugs are illegal and confiscated? Hows that working?
-
Replying to whom?
quinnox
-
Because the gun laws in Chicago, New York, and LA have worked sooooooooooooo well. Freaking idiots the whole lot of them. :hammer: :banghead:
-
Two relevant quotes. First, the legendary daveman:
"Scratch a liberal, find a fascist."
Second, Adolf Hitler:
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing."
-- Adolph Hitler, Hitler's Secret Conversations 403 (Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens trans., 1961)
-
Of course they wouldn't even bother trying to change the constitution first because they only like the parts they can use to their advantage. And the only way something like this would work on a massive scale (plenty of D's own & collect guns, too) is to send the military to cities & towns across the country forcing people at the barrel of a gun. I doubt that's an order they would follow (and they ARE allowed to refuse an order that violates the constitution since they take a vow to protect that and not Democrats). Besides, that would mean they'd have to go against their own family, friends and neighbors.
Cindie
-
300 million guns. At least a million people who would resist. There is not a sane man who would sign up to take guns away from an armed people..
My thinking exactly. First few times that LEOs came to take our guns and were shot it would be pretty damn hard to get them to keep going. For proof look at how many illegal guns are removed from inner cities when they know they will shoot back versus writing tickets to law abiding citizens.
-
Go ahead libbie dems. Pass some law to confiscate firearms. That worked out so well for you last time.
-
This is why we need guns in the first place, to protect ourselves and our country from people who wish to take our rights away from us. You think they'll stop with guns? Pfft! Yeah right.
-
I wonder if history would have played differently if there was a clear RKBA in place in Berlin in 1938. I wonde if Kristallnacht would have been as effective for the Nazis.
-
Liberty exists when the government fears its citizens.
Tyranny exists when the citizens fear the government.
The 2nd Amendment was put into the Bill Of Rights specifically to keep the government afraid of its citizens.
(BTW, I see someone got Class Valedictorian in Condylura cristata studies . . . )
-
Molon Labe, ****ers.
So honest question for ya--who's gonna do it? YOU? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
This is why we need guns in the first place, to protect ourselves and our country from people who wish to take our rights away from us. You think they'll stop with guns? Pfft! Yeah right.
Put in another way.
The right to keep and bear arms assures positive defence against all enemies, both foregin and domestic.
Yes, or no.
-
You and what army?
-
300 million guns. At least a million people who would resist. There is not a sane man who would sign up to take guns away from an armed people..
I can pretty much guarantee that a minimum of 75% of the law enforcement community (including urban) would say GFY.
They're real problem is that a lot of states would have governments openly hostile to the government in Washington.
You betcha. A very large proportion of those officials fall into the gun owning -lotsa Democrats, too - public category. They would be highly pissed.
-
Molon Labe, ****ers.
So honest question for ya--who's gonna do it? YOU? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Heeyyyyy you may just be on to something here! Unemployed DUmmies and libs should be hired to do the actual confiscation, no training required because they're all smarter than us anyways. :-)
-
What I find hilarious is that some primitives think only law-enforcement should be able to possess guns (in addition to Treyyvon Martin's brothers and pals, of course; primitives don't care about illegal firearms, only legal ones).
I don't think primitives would care for a society where only the cops are armed; it'd be dangerous for them.
-
What I find hilarious is that some primitives think only law-enforcement should be able to possess guns (in addition to Treyyvon Martin's brothers and pals, of course; primitives don't care about illegal firearms, only legal ones).
I don't think primitives would care for a society where only the cops are armed; it'd be dangerous for them.
So the day comes that our local police come to our homes with a list of guns they know we legally bought. They say to keep our property we need to pass a mental evaluation done by WHO ?????
Who are the people chosen to decide if we are compatent to own our own property? Are these evaluators competent to by themselves to make any decision ?
Crap, easy to move all arms to a secure location and call the police to say they have all been stolen-----
Those with illegal weapons fall off the chart as there is no paper trail for anyone to follow . Only the honest buy legally with a paper trail.
I think Obama has his balls in a sling, the Constitution and Bill of Rights was written to insure we citizens had the right to rebel against our Government in case of the Government trying to inslave us.
Our Founders were just a generation from the very reason people fled Europe. They wanted to insure this country would ever have to endure others in the future that could come along and turn us back into the Government control they or family's had escaped from.
Seems to have worked so far, the Government does in fact need to fear us, only ones that fear the Government are those that depend on the Government to insure their survival.
-
It could be just like marijuana laws and sanctuary cities. Certain states, mostly the ones that the people from the east and west cost fly over to get from one high income tax are to another would allow possession.
I would find it interesting if a state changed its constitution to ensure gun possession within the boards and maybe a strip of states from say Texas to North Dakota establish a multi-state carry permit. Would drive the know it alls on the coasts to have a fit, but it would be worth it. Let the criminals in Chicago, Detroit and DC run over the law abiding citizens that are not allowed to own a weapon run the place.
I personally am willing to become a felon with a couple of weapons buried in the ground.
-
The scariest thing is that the 0bama regime thinks so much like the self admitted lunatics at the DUmp.
-
I can pretty much guarantee that a minimum of 75% of the law enforcement community (including urban) would say GFY.
The Oath of Office for lawmen is very similar to the Oath of Enlistment for the Armed Forces.
"Support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the State of..."
"Support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;"
Support and defend the Constitution comes first for a reason.
Molon labe.
-
It could be just like marijuana laws and sanctuary cities. Certain states, mostly the ones that the people from the east and west cost fly over to get from one high income tax are to another would allow possession.
I would find it interesting if a state changed its constitution to ensure gun possession within the boards and maybe a strip of states from say Texas to North Dakota establish a multi-state carry permit. Would drive the know it alls on the coasts to have a fit, but it would be worth it. Let the criminals in Chicago, Detroit and DC run over the law abiding citizens that are not allowed to own a weapon run the place.
I personally am willing to become a felon with a couple of weapons buried in the ground.
My step-son went to Homestead, FL to the last NASCAR race of the season, and he checked to see which states along his route honored our state's CCW permits.
All did, EXCEPT for one, Georgia. What does Georgia have that the others didn't? Dimrats running the place.
Go figure. :hammer:
On a side note, IF the LOCAL LEO's were instructed to "gather all the guns" around here, it wouldn't get done. The sheriff knows everybody, everybody knows him, he knows who does and doesn't own guns, and he would NOT put himself or his people in harms way for a STUPID mandate.
-
Put in another way.
The right to keep and bear arms assures positive defence against all enemies, both foregin and domestic.
Yes, or no.
Yes. These people would qualify as domestic enemies to our liberty and American way of life, but these guys are probably unemployed upper middle class kids who want society to pamper them like their parents do.
-
Don't tell me it couldn't be done, because it could be. We went to the moon for gods sake, we could begin a gun Illegal alien round up and be successful. It would take time, but it would not be an impossible task.
Fixed.
-
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/67766_2591539684106_438318717_n.jpg)