The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on December 11, 2012, 08:11:04 PM
-
bigdarryl (8,759 posts)
I'm paying already 25% in taxes on a retired salary and it will go up to 31% if we go over the cliff
MOTHER****ERS!!!!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251260981
Oh shut the hell up DUmmy, you demand that other people get their taxes raised then you have the nerve to bitch that you may have to pay more.
The funny thing is the others DUmmies eat him alive!
geek tragedy (20,453 posts)
1. the 25% tax bracket would become a 28% tax bracket.
And that's only for money above and beyond $70K/year.
CreekDog (34,592 posts)
17. if he's in NYC or San Francisco, it's barely enough to pay the rent of an apartment
well, unless you want food or something.
many have it worse, but 70k in some urban centers. means that $2000/month for rent is a lot less possible, especially for retirees that don't have health benefits.
Recursion (19,098 posts)
3. You're retired and making more than 70K?
Good for you.
Yeah he needs to pay his fair share, damn rich bastard.
SheilaT (11,454 posts)
9. I sure as heck wish I earned enough money
to be in that tax bracket.
Give the democrats enough time and you will be in that tax bracket, you won't be making more money your taxes will just be that high.
-
Hypocrites and useless parasites,every last damn one of them.
-
Recursion (19,098 posts)
3. You're retired and making more than 70K?
Someone finally got the point of DUmmy bigdarryl's post.
He sounds like a Pam Dawson clone.
-
CreekDog (34,592 posts)
17. if he's in NYC or San Francisco, it's barely enough to pay the rent of an apartment
Notice that big city leftist cities or states are always the most expensive places to live and have the highest tax rates and income inequality.
That dear DUmbass is what the result of leftist policies ALWAYS brings, the elimination of the middle class.
-
CreekDog (34,592 posts)
17. if he's in NYC or San Francisco, it's barely enough to pay the rent of an apartment
but 70k in some urban centers. means that $2000/month for rent is a lot less possible,
$70K/yr is plenty for $2000/mo rent.
-
Retired and making $70k?
That means he was probably making at least $140k when he was working.
Probably a school janitor in CA.
-
Retired and making $70k?
That means he was probably making at least $140k when he was working.
Probably a school janitor in CA.
Doesn't work that way anymore in the public sector. Most likely he earned $60k when he retired. While SS recipients got a ZERO COLA the public employee retiree in kalifornia got almost a 20% COLA in the last four years.
-
Doesn't work that way anymore in the public sector. Most likely he earned $60k when he retired. While SS recipients got a ZERO COLA the public employee retiree in kalifornia got almost a 20% COLA in the last four years.
Then there's those little things like cashing out vacation days or getting a late promotion to raise their base pay retirement which is widespread throughout public unions.
-
SheilaT (11,454 posts)
9. I sure as heck wish I earned enough money
to be in that tax bracket.
Our household is in that tax bracket. It's not hard. All you have to do is get up in the morning, go to work, and do your job without bitching and moaning every second of the day. A little bit of hard work and you can be in a higher tax bracket too.
-
Yeah I get into that bracket when I work 70 hours a week!
-
bigdarryl (8,759 posts)
I'm paying already 25% in taxes on a retired salary and it will go up to 31% if we go over the cliff
MOTHER****ERS!!!!!
You wanted it, you voted for it, you got it... enjoy.
-
As the left's pogrom against the evil rich <and we know who they really are> it might stand them in good stead to reflect on these words:
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin-Niemöller
It would seem there are many, many more millionaires out there, many of whom don't think of themselves as millionaires. But as the ever increasing net of government is cast they too will be hauled in. Hey DUmmies class was far is nasty business. Think back to the childhood story of the girl who released the whirlwind as you read this article.
Millionaires, Billionaires, and Teachers
By Randall Hoven
Our President likes to use the phrase "millionaires and billionaires." A person whose net worth is $1 million or more is a "millionaire."
Most of us working stiffs have trouble thinking in terms of net worth; we are more used to the concept of annual salary. How does net worth translate into annual income, or vice versa? In round numbers, the annual income equivalent is 4% of an investment nest egg. So if you have $1 million socked away, consider that to be equal to $40,000 income every year.
{snip}
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/millionaires_billionaires_and_teachers.html#ixzz2Eq6Ylt00
It will take lots less teachers to indoctrinate than educate so there will be plenty available for the fields come the revolution DUmmies. Study history. Learn it, cause otherwise you will live it.
-
BigDumbDarryl is retired? I thought he was some dopey 18 year old. Another poster says he's 53 (and retired!)
He never returns to the thread. Another DUmmie says:
This $2500 figure is scare mongering for most people with anywhere around the average income.
No it's not. It's real and Obama is even using it in his propaganda.
Much of the thread is naked envy over BigDumbDarryl's income. Which I'm not buying.
-
Much of the thread is naked envy over BigDumbDarryl's income. Which I'm not buying.
Nor should you.
In a thread I brought over this past weekend wherein the Little Tyrants were discussin whether or not members of comintern in good standing should be allowed to send their unaborted masses of vaguely viable tissue to private schools if the public schools were lacking.
A counter-intuitively high percentage of them admitted to having access to schools in affluent districts.