The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on December 02, 2012, 05:40:18 AM
-
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 12:05 AM
nadinbrzezinski (112,595 posts)
View profile
The history channels, a story of us
Is a mess. High production values, but no coherency.
I like history, but lord, what a mess.
Response to amerikat (Reply #3)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 12:22 AM
nadinbrzezinski (112,595 posts)
4. A few American Historians ave a few choice words for it
View profile
I am trained and I tried to do a class as scattered as this...the dates are right, the data (for a change) is right, I know the timelines, and lord this is jumping all over.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021914297
Do we have professor on Nad's resume?
-
Professor of what, though?
Professor of not knowing what she's talking about?
-
I am trained and I tried to do a class as scattered as this...the dates are right, the data (for a change) is right, I know the timelines, and lord this is jumping all over.
Not sure who the class was for.
-
Not sure who the class was for.
I think she left out an "If" in there, Nads often leaves out words because she is, after all, a demented little troll who thinks in sentence fragments while fantasizing about being in charge of the world.
I saw part of it; pretty good for a History Channel product, a lot of their stuff is big on interviews with the same series of talking heads and with lots of present-day value judgments on people who lived in an entirely different frame of reference, with a fair amount of errors, but this series was well above their usual mediocrity.
-
Just another example of her brilliance.
She uses utter incoherence to strengthen her complaint about incoherence.
A lesser DUmmy could never use that strategy, let alone understand it.
It's a device reserved for use only by highly trained historians, radiation experts, EMTs, and arrogant, conceited moonbats.
-
If ignorance is bliss, gNads is in heaven.
-
If ignorance is bliss, gNads is in runs heaven.
Fixxord.
-
Fixxord.
:lmao: :cheersmate:
-
Response to KittyWampus (Reply #12)
Sun Dec 2, 2012, 12:53 AM
nadinbrzezinski (112,602 posts)
13. The problem is that it is jumping all over
And speaking of Pizarro (not by name) in Peru before Columbus managed to bump on the New Word is...shall we say...confusing.
I mean just a generation difference.
That is my critique of it.
Hey, production values are there, so hope it leads to people reading on some of these events.
She's still being incoherent.
But I don't care what Columbus did, I still prefer the King James Version.
-
nadinbrzezinski (112,595 posts)
...no coherency.
(http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff68/kayaktn/potandkettle.jpg)
eom.
-
One thing's for sure - if it doesn't paint America as the root cause of all the world's ills from Columbus' first landing forward, it will be trash according to DUmmy-think.
-
She's still being incoherent.
But I don't care what Columbus did, I still prefer the King James Version.
History comes in many colors perhaps 3 different view points but all is valid by the writers. Three different points of view, 3 different interpretations on who ,what, why, how ,when.
To understand history one has to see it through the eyes of all sides, the winners, the losers and the by standers.
Vanity Press in the late 1800 published the diary's of those involved in the Civil War. Both sides published their memoir's about the same incident and it is fascinating to read how both sides saw the incident from their point of view.
There is no definitive absolutely true of any happening, but we can at least see one side of the incident until another is found from the opposing side, or an on looker with no stakes in the game.
-
If anything at least the ytried to research it Gnads ,you on the otherhand make shit up as it suits you and the few lapdogs that still follow you at DU love it.