The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on November 19, 2012, 06:52:51 PM
-
nadinbrzezinski (112,061 posts)
5. There are levels of connection we barely comprehend
View profile
and I do not believe in God either.
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1846039
If you were aware of this then I apologize for starting the thread. I am actually surprised by this utterance.
-
She doesn't believe in God because it would require admitting that someone else knows more than she does. :rofl:
-
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1846039
If you were aware of this then I apologize for starting the thread. I am actually surprised by this utterance.
She doesn't believe in God. Based on her resume and attitude I thought she believed she was god.
-
The oblate spheroid, rejecting the wisdom of all her people who came before her, doesn't acknowledge God because it would mean she'd have to admit someone else knows more than she does.
She actually believes this crap; that she herself is infallible God.
Really.
She believes it.
-
God is thankful,He wouldn`t want to listen to her all day either.
-
She doesn't believe in God because it would require admitting that someone else knows more than she does. :rofl:
Nailed it.
:cheersmate:
-
She doesn't believe in God because it would require admitting that someone else knows more than she does. :rofl:
:lmao:
-
She doesn't believe in God. Based on her resume and attitude I thought she believed she was god.
Fixed.
-
I guess Nads knows about fire proofing.
-
God is thankful,He wouldn`t want to listen to her all day either.
:lmao:
-
The oblate spheroid, rejecting the wisdom of all her people who came before her, doesn't acknowledge God because it would mean she'd have to admit someone else knows more than she does.
She actually believes this crap; that she herself is infallible God.
Really.
She believes it.
Well, if that doesn't describe a perennial DUmmy of the Year, I don't know what does.
I guess, being an online community, we cannot have a winner by acclamation.
-
In spite of the photographic evidence, I do not believe Nads exists. I think she is the latest incarnation of that AI program from the 1980s, Dr. Spatio or something like that.
Pretty much a text parser that would have a conversation with you based on what you typed in. Someone types ORCA into Nad's i/o device and suddenly she googles everything she can on hackers to carry on what seems like a conversation about hackers. But it is one-sided.
-
Well, if that doesn't describe a perennial DUmmy of the Year, I don't know what does.
I guess, being an online community, we cannot have a winner by acclamation.
No, we can't do that. We have to carry on the nominations and elections no matter how barren the field.
And it is possible the oblate spheroid might end up in second or third place; who knows.
Pamela might be the monkey-wrench in nadin's engine.
-
No, we can't do that. We have to carry on the nominations and elections no matter how barren the field.
And it is possible the oblate spheroid might end up in second or third place; who knows.
Pamela might be the monkey-wrench in nadin's engine.
Pam's only hope for a top five finish is if she dies and live-tweets it.
-
Pam's only hope for a top five finish is if she dies and live-tweets it.
That could happen.
She's promised us, after all.
-
That could happen.
She's promised us, after all.
When was the last time a liberal kept a promise?
-
I guess it would be "dead-tweets".
-
In spite of the photographic evidence, I do not believe Nads exists. I think she is the latest incarnation of that AI program from the 1980s, Dr. Spatio or something like that.
Pretty much a text parser that would have a conversation with you based on what you typed in. Someone types ORCA into Nad's i/o device and suddenly she googles everything she can on hackers to carry on what seems like a conversation about hackers. But it is one-sided.
Did you see the episodes where they played Watson the computer on Jeopardy?
Nads is like Watson but gets every answer wrong.
-
Did you see the episodes where they played Watson the computer on Jeopardy?
Nads is like Watson but gets every answer wrong.
I did not see it but your observation made me laugh!
-
Pam's only hope for a top five finish is if she dies and live-tweets it.
I just thought of something; this year's contest for the Top DUmmie is strongly reminiscent of the contest for the Democrat presidential nomination in 1956.
Adlai Stevenson had been the Democrat candidate in 1952, and it was generally assumed he'd be again.
But not quite; Estes Kefauver got into it, and then Harry Truman went to work for Averell Harriman.
(For lurking primitives, whose knowledge of history is absymal, Stevenson had been governor of Illinois, and lost to Dwight Eisenhower in a landslide in 1952; Kefauver was a U.S. Senator from Tennesseee and an occasional presidential candidate, and Harriman was then governor of New York.)
I'm looking at the oblate spheroid as Adlai Stevenson, Pamela as Estes Kefauver, and the pie-and-jam primitive as Averell Harriman.
<<has donned the mantle of Harry Truman this year.
-
I just thought of something; this year's contest for the Top DUmmie is strongly reminiscent of the contest for the Democrat presidential nomination in 1956.
Adlai Stevenson had been the Democrat candidate in 1952, and it was generally assumed he'd be again.
But not quite; Estes Kefauver got into it, and then Harry Truman went to work for Averell Harriman.
(For lurking primitives, whose knowledge of history is absymal, Stevenson had been governor of Illinois, and lost to Dwight Eisenhower in a landslide in 1952; Kefauver was a U.S. Senator from Tennesseee and an occasional presidential candidate, and Harriman was then governor of New York.)
I'm looking at the oblate spheroid as Adlai Stevenson, Pamela as Estes Kefauver, and the pie-and-jam primitive as Averell Harriman.
<<has donned the mantle of Harry Truman this year.
1956 was the last election not dominated by television.
In 1952 and again in 1956, it was between two bald guys.
Today, there's no way a bald man could be a serious candidate.
Even Plugs Biden knows that.