The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Ptarmigan on November 14, 2012, 03:16:54 PM

Title: Fast and Furious or Benghazi
Post by: Ptarmigan on November 14, 2012, 03:16:54 PM
Which one is worse, Fast and Furious or Benghazi?
Title: Re: Fast and Furious or Benghazi
Post by: DefiantSix on November 14, 2012, 03:29:37 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: Fast and Furious or Benghazi
Post by: Freeper on November 14, 2012, 03:35:24 PM
That is like asking is liver cancer or lung cancer worse.
Title: Re: Fast and Furious or Benghazi
Post by: Freeper on November 14, 2012, 03:36:04 PM
Based on body count f and f.
Title: Re: Fast and Furious or Benghazi
Post by: Ptarmigan on November 14, 2012, 03:38:32 PM
I am no tinfoil wearing person. I wonder if they could find a connection with Benghazi and Fast and Furious. The weapons used by the terrorists in the attacks could be guns that Mexican drug cartelers sold to them, which came from Fast and Furious.
Title: Re: Fast and Furious or Benghazi
Post by: Freeper on November 14, 2012, 03:39:45 PM
I am no tinfoil wearing person. I wonder if they could find a connection with Benghazi and Fast and Furious. The weapons used by the terrorists in the attacks could be guns that Mexican drug cartelers sold to them, which came from Fast and Furious.

I vote no. Then again with this bunch there is no telling.
Title: Re: Fast and Furious or Benghazi
Post by: thundley4 on November 14, 2012, 06:02:39 PM
Based on body count f and f.

Even one was too many.

However, I think Benghazi was worse, because they watched in real time while our people died, and still refused to send help.