The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: ChuckJ on October 20, 2012, 09:51:34 AM
-
I've been reading posts by the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com for 10 or so years now. Like most normal and decent people, I've laughed at their ignorance, delusions, and utter stupidity. After replying to a post here the other day I began wondering, if a person was a blank slate what would he or she learn from the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com? I decided I'd make a list.
Below are some of the things that you can learn from the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com:
Murdering an unborn baby is a good and wonderful thing.
While acting under authority of a Republican president, stopping a terrorist with deadly force before he kills innocents is an evil and terrible thing.
Murdering an unborn baby is a good and wonderful thing.
Hunting and killing a animal to eat is an evil and terrible thing.
Being a member of Islamic group, even if they execute homosexuals for being homosexual, that hates America is a good and wonderful thing.
Being a Christian and stating that you don't agree with the homosexual lifestyle is an evil and terrible thing.
Calling a black woman who happens to be republican an Aunt Jemima is a good and wonderful thing.
Saying you disagree with the policies of a Socialistic half-white president is an evil and racist thing.
Calling the members of our military who risk their lives for our freedoms such things as baby killers is a good and wonderful thing.
Calling the members of terrorist groups who murder innocent men, women and children anything other than freedom fighters is an evil and terrible thing.
Forcing a religious charity group to go against their faith is a good and wonderful thing.
Saying "God bless you" or "Merry Christmas" is an evil and terrible thing.
The government stealing money from working men and women and giving it to parasites who are too lazy to work is a good and wonderful thing.
A person being successful through his or her own hard work and effort is an evil and terrible thing.
If a president is Republican he controls all of the gas prices and faulting him if gas prices are high is a good and wonderful thing.
If a president is Democrat he has NO control over gas prices and faulting him if gas prices are high is an evil and terrible thing.
Forcing a Christian group that views homosexuality as a sin to accept homosexual marriage is a good and wonderful thing.
A school allowing students to voluntarily pray at events such as football games or graduations is an evil and terrible thing.
If a president is Democrat, unemployment above 8% is a good and wonderful thing.
If a president is Republican, unemployment below 6% is an evil and terrible thing.
Supporting policies that suggest women and blacks are inferior and can't succeed without assistance is a good and wonderful thing.
Believing that all people are equal regardless of race or gender and should be treated as equal is an evil and terrible thing.
Supporting religious extremists who kill all who disagree with them is a good and wonderful thing.
Being a Christian who prays for those who disagree is an evil and terrible thing.
The above are just a few of the things that you can learn from the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com
-
I think one point needs to be clarified, "Stopping a terrorist with deadly force before he kills innocents is an evil and terrible thing". That act is only evil if a republican gives the order. 0bama spends every Tuesday compiling a kill list and there is no outcry, there is no screaming of impeachment, and they actually give 0bama hero status for doing so.
-
I think one point needs to be clarified, "Stopping a terrorist with deadly force before he kills innocents is an evil and terrible thing". That act is only evil if a republican gives the order. 0bama spends every Tuesday compiling a kill list and there is no outcry, there is no screaming of impeachment, and they actually give 0bama hero status for doing so.
You are correct. I made the change.
When I started the list I tried to keep it simple, but that was surprisingly difficult due to the mindset of the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com.
For instance, saying the color orange is nice is innocuous UNLESS a known Republican or Democrat is making the statement. If a Republican says 'the color orange is nice' it changes from innocuous to evil and terrible. If a Democrat says 'the color orange is nice' it changes from innocuous to good and wonderful.
-
Don't mess up your wonderful original post by another re-edit, but I'm also thinking this.
When the rules work against the Democrats, liberals, and primitives, the rules are unfair and need changed, even violated.
When the rules work for the Democrats, liberals, and primitives, the Republicans need to abide by the rules.
I'm reminded of this because of Kyle Ricky's post in the Election forum here, about what would happen if the electoral college vote ended up a tie between Romney and Barack Milhous--what would happen then?
The rule about that's in the Constitution.
The primitives would've loved this rule in 2000; in 2012, not so much.
-
You are correct. I made the change.
When I started the list I tried to keep it simple, but that was surprisingly difficult due to the mindset of the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com.
For instance, saying the color orange is nice is innocuous UNLESS a known Republican or Democrat is making the statement. If a Republican says 'the color orange is nice' it changes from innocuous to evil and terrible. If a Democrat says 'the color orange is nice' it changes from innocuous to good and wonderful.
I think you did well, splaining it all.
-
Don't mess up your wonderful original post by another re-edit, but I'm also thinking this.
When the rules work against the Democrats, liberals, and primitives, the rules are unfair and need changed, even violated.
When the rules work for the Democrats, liberals, and primitives, the Republicans need to abide by the rules.
I'm reminded of this because of Kyle Ricky's post in the Election forum here, about what would happen if the electoral college vote ended up a tie between Romney and Barack Milhous--what would happen then?
The rule about that's in the Constitution.
The primitives would've loved this rule in 2000; in 2012, not so much.
The one good thing about the members of the Democrat Party is that they are predictable that way.
-
The one good thing about the members of the Democrat Party is that they are predictable that way.
One recalls too the fiasco (for the Democrats) that took place a couple of years ago.
When the Democrats of Massachusetts thought the Bostonian Billionaire might win the presidential election of 2004, and have to resign from the Senate, they also remembered something else. Under the then-rules, the governor of the commonwealth appointed a successor.
The governor at the time was.....Mitt Romney, and it was reasonably assumed he'd appoint a Republican.
So the Democrats changed the rule, that an election, not the governor, would determine the Bostonian Billionaire's successor, assuming it'd be a Democrat.
Inbetweentimes, a Democrat got elected to the governor's office.
Under the old rules, he would've named a successor, but no, the rules had been changed.
Then Vast Teddy died, opening up that Senate seat.
Under the old rules, the Democrat would've been able to name a Democrat to the seat; but no, an election had to be held.
And thus we ended up with the Republican Scott Brown.
Too bad for the primitives.
Something similar in Wyoming happened many years before that; the governor used to appoint a successor to a vacant Senate seat, but the Democrats whined that the governor was always Republican, and so the appointee would be Republican too.
So they got the rules changed to where the governor had to appoint someone of the same political party as the now-retired or dead senator.
Inbetweentimes, a Democrat got elected governor, and a Republican senate seat became vacant.
And so the Democrat had to appoint a Republican.
Too bad for the primitives.
-
One recalls too the fiasco (for the Democrats) that took place a couple of years ago.
When the Democrats of Massachusetts thought the Bostonian Billionaire might win the presidential election of 2004, and have to resign from the Senate, they also remembered something else. Under the then-rules, the governor of the commonwealth appointed a successor.
The governor at the time was.....Mitt Romney, and it was reasonably assumed he'd appoint a Republican.
So the Democrats changed the rule, that an election, not the governor, would determine the Bostonian Billionaire's successor, assuming it'd be a Democrat.
Inbetweentimes, a Democrat got elected to the governor's office.
Under the old rules, he would've named a successor, but no, the rules had been changed.
Then Vast Teddy died, opening up that Senate seat.
Under the old rules, the Democrat would've been able to name a Democrat to the seat; but no, an election had to be held.
And thus we ended up with the Republican Scott Brown.
Too bad for the primitives.
Something similar in Wyoming happened many years before that; the governor used to appoint a successor to a vacant Senate seat, but the Democrats whined that the governor was always Republican, and so the appointee would be Republican too.
So they got the rules changed to where the governor had to appoint someone of the same political party as the now-retired or dead senator.
Inbetweentimes, a Democrat got elected governor, and a Republican senate seat became vacant.
And so the Democrat had to appoint a Republican.
Too bad for the primitives.
You forget, Frank that the dems tried their hardest to change that rule in Mass.
-
I've been reading posts by the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com for 10 or so years now. Like most normal and decent people, I've laughed at their ignorance, delusions, and utter stupidity. After replying to a post here the other day I began wondering, if a person was a blank slate what would he or she learn from the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com? I decided I'd make a list.
Below are some of the things that you can learn from the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com:
Murdering an unborn baby is a good and wonderful thing.
While acting under authority of a Republican president, stopping a terrorist with deadly force before he kills innocents is an evil and terrible thing.
Murdering an unborn baby is a good and wonderful thing.
Hunting and killing a animal to eat is an evil and terrible thing.
Being a member of Islamic group, even if they execute homosexuals for being homosexual, that hates America is a good and wonderful thing.
Being a Christian and stating that you don't agree with the homosexual lifestyle is an evil and terrible thing.
Calling a black woman who happens to be republican an Aunt Jemima is a good and wonderful thing.
Saying you disagree with the policies of a Socialistic half-white president is an evil and racist thing.
Calling the members of our military who risk their lives for our freedoms such things as baby killers is a good and wonderful thing.
Calling the members of terrorist groups who murder innocent men, women and children anything other than freedom fighters is an evil and terrible thing.
Forcing a religious charity group to go against their faith is a good and wonderful thing.
Saying "God bless you" or "Merry Christmas" is an evil and terrible thing.
The government stealing money from working men and women and giving it to parasites who are too lazy to work is a good and wonderful thing.
A person being successful through his or her own hard work and effort is an evil and terrible thing.
If a president is Republican he controls all of the gas prices and faulting him if gas prices are high is a good and wonderful thing.
If a president is Democrat he has NO control over gas prices and faulting him if gas prices are high is an evil and terrible thing.
Forcing a Christian group that views homosexuality as a sin to accept homosexual marriage is a good and wonderful thing.
A school allowing students to voluntarily pray at events such as football games or graduations is an evil and terrible thing.
If a president is Democrat, unemployment above 8% is a good and wonderful thing.
If a president is Republican, unemployment below 6% is an evil and terrible thing.
Supporting policies that suggest women and blacks are inferior and can't succeed without assistance is a good and wonderful thing.
Believing that all people are equal regardless of race or gender and should be treated as equal is an evil and terrible thing.
Supporting religious extremists who kill all who disagree with them is a good and wonderful thing.
Being a Christian who prays for those who disagree is an evil and terrible thing.
The above are just a few of the things that you can learn from the members of the Democrat Party that post at DemocratUnderground.com
:clap: :clap:
-
You forget, Frank that the dems tried their hardest to change that rule in Mass.
Yeah, and they'd just changed the rule (to election) about three or four years previously.
It'd be nice to make a rule, and stick with it. Like Republicans do.
After all, it is a double-edged sword, cutting both ways.
-
Yeah, and they'd just changed the rule (to election) about three or four years previously.
It'd be nice to make a rule, and stick with it. Like Republicans do.
After all, it is a double-edged sword, cutting both ways.
Yes they had changed the rule assuming Kerry was gonna win. Then when Ted died they tried to change it back, but they couldn't and Scott Brown took that seat, and hopefully he will keep fauxahontas out of it.
-
Yes they had changed the rule assuming Kerry was gonna win. Then when Ted died they tried to change it back, but they couldn't and Scott Brown took that seat, and hopefully he will keep fauxahontas out of it.
Uh huh.
Once a rule's made, the Democrats, liberals, and primitives should stick with it.
After all, about half the time they benefit from the rules.
<<knows lots of examples of Democrat governors appointing Democrats to vacant Republican Senate seats.
-
Uh huh.
Once a rule's made, the Democrats, liberals, and primitives should stick with it.
After all, about half the time they benefit from the rules.
<<knows lots of examples of Democrat governors appointing Democrats to vacant Republican Senate seats.
One note to clarify. Before the election they did change the rules to allow Patrick to appoint a temporary replacement so "Massachusetts would not go unrepresented during this critical time" . If you recall Patrick also held up the certification of Brown after the election so that the temporary replacement would be allowed to vote on Obamacare which he did.
It boggles the mind how corrupt things are in Mass, keep in mind the last three speakers of the House have all been convicted of felonies.
Chicago has nothing on us.
-
One of the things about liberal's hypocritical attitudes that bothers me the most is "it's not fascism when our guy does it". If Laura Bush had told Americans that they can no longer eat king-size candy bars, and can no longer pack their kids' own lunches, they would have gone apeshit. Warrant less wiretapping under Bush = impeachable, but under Obama = he knows better than we do. I could fill a list 2 pages long, but this makes my teeth itch when they pull this crap.
-
It's that Party Uber Alles mentality... the Communists are good at that kind of thinking.
-
Rules are in place to stifle Conservatives.
They are in place to prevent Conservative thought.
The term "compromise", only serves socialist causes.
A hundre years ago, it worked.
Now, it's just a "pass this", or I"ll pout.
Time to tell the primites that post on democratic underground.com, to suck it up.
-
One note to clarify. Before the election they did change the rules to allow Patrick to appoint a temporary replacement so "Massachusetts would not go unrepresented during this critical time" . If you recall Patrick also held up the certification of Brown after the election so that the temporary replacement would be allowed to vote on Obamacare which he did.
It boggles the mind how corrupt things are in Mass, keep in mind the last three speakers of the House have all been convicted of felonies.
Chicago has nothing on us.
I actually forgot about that. :doh:
-
Yes, you can learn a lot about how Democrats think and their real positions on the issues of the day by reading what members of the Democrat Party post at DemocratUnderground.com
:popcorn: