The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Revolution on October 01, 2012, 11:03:58 PM

Title: Youterus
Post by: Revolution on October 01, 2012, 11:03:58 PM
Quote
Atman (24,717 posts)

I drew a new Mittens cartoon...
Last edited Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:17 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

I haven't drawn any new stuff in quite a while, but I couldn't let this election cycle go by. I'm working on Queen Ann's portrait now.
 
(http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/317658_390648364342442_1284269484_n.jpg)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021449391

This is the second piece of...erm...work I've seen from the evil twin. Not any better. In fact, it sucks out loud. My father could draw you killing yourself, and people would be lined up around the block to buy the image. (Going to the highest bidder, of course) He has artwork hanging on various people's walls across the nation, in fact. This piece of artwork-term used very loosely-wouldn't be fit to print out, and throw in the toilet before I sat down.

His little message on the bottom is not only NOT clever, it's been thought of by slightly smarter people. You fail again, Atman.

The usual schmoozing ensues though. I wonder when the primitives as a whole will stop kissing it's ass, and go on the offensive as they did with Nadin?
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: thundley4 on October 01, 2012, 11:11:58 PM
To the rest of the DUmmies, this was pure genius, though.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Revolution on October 01, 2012, 11:12:53 PM
Wow.... Don't know why that still mildly surprises me.  :thatsright:
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Bad Dog on October 01, 2012, 11:14:10 PM
Not bad work for crayons.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Ogre on October 02, 2012, 12:02:23 AM
The only college class I struggled in was art appreciation.  I should have taken something else to fullfill the humanities requirement.

I still can't tell a Picasso from a van Gogh, and frankly I don't really care who painted what.

But am I missing something here, is this satire, or is this just that poorly done?
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Celtic Rose on October 02, 2012, 07:26:55 AM
As long as they persist in their belief that conservative women are downtrodden by the men in their lives they will continue to misunderstand our motives.  I am not motivated by my uterus.  In a way, democrats are very sexist on this issue, they seem to assume that women care more about their reproductive "rights" than about matters like the economy. 

Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: franksolich on October 02, 2012, 07:54:08 AM
Not bad work for crayons.

Not bad for the second-stupidest person on the internet either.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: franksolich on October 02, 2012, 08:07:15 AM
The usual schmoozing ensues though. I wonder when the primitives as a whole will stop kissing its ass, and go on the offensive as they did with Nadin?

The primitives don't have to go after Atman, because inevitably he's rude to someone, making that primitive think less highly of him than we do.

Watch; it's a near-100% happening on his campfires.  Not all of them, but nearly all of them.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: MrsSmith on October 02, 2012, 08:14:18 AM
They also miss the very basic point that "YOU" and the person inside your uterus are not the same person.  That fact is just beyond the thought capacity of "the most intelligent and educated."
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Karin on October 02, 2012, 08:39:19 AM
His stuff embarrasses me deeply.  What is this "uterus" stuff anyways?  The poster makes no sense.  I think he just wanted to use a lady-parts word. 

I'm getting sick of the democrats thinking of women (and me) as mere ****holes. 
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 02, 2012, 08:56:20 AM
I have to admit that sometimes I struggle to find the comments on this board.

They're concealed within an enormous mass of irritating, cutesy sig line crap.

We're not unusual. Most online forums bear a similar burden.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Revolution on October 02, 2012, 09:14:28 AM
His stuff embarrasses me deeply.  What is this "uterus" stuff anyways?  The poster makes no sense.  I think he just wanted to use a lady-parts word. 

I'm getting sick of the democrats thinking of women (and me) as mere ****holes

I still can't remember the femanazi primitive who said that term, and brought it to light to me about 2 1/2 years ago, but my dad and I joked about the idiot femanazi for a few days after that. I believe her exact words were "walking ****holes."
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 02, 2012, 09:16:02 AM
I have to admit that sometimes I struggle to find the comments on this board.

They're concealed within an enormous mass of irritating, cutesy sig line crap.

We're not unusual. Most online forums bear a similar burden.

It's an individual choice.  Why do you hate our freedoms?

 :tongue:
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Cruise on October 02, 2012, 09:16:28 AM
As long as they persist in their belief that conservative women are downtrodden by the men in their lives they will continue to misunderstand our motives.  I am not motivated by my uterus.  In a way, democrats are very sexist on this issue, they seem to assume that women care more about their reproductive "rights" than about matters like the economy. 



Projection.  White male primitives think with nothing but their d**k, so they assume women think (and vote) with nothing but their uterus as well.

Now go forth and dance with your uterus on your forehead like a good primitive womyn.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: jtyangel on October 02, 2012, 09:21:45 AM
As long as they persist in their belief that conservative women are downtrodden by the men in their lives they will continue to misunderstand our motives.  I am not motivated by my uterus.  In a way, democrats are very sexist on this issue, they seem to assume that women care more about their reproductive "rights" than about matters like the economy.

Agreed. My beau and I discussed this recently and I said it floored me the sexism inherent among liberals. It seems to me in their world women are nothing but sex organs. Same for gays since they define them by their sexuality rather then more enduring and substantive factors. Too bad your average 'fall for the one liners' voters out there can't handle a thought beyond a bumper sticker to discern the issue with this. I can't tell you the number of women on social media who try to call out conservatives for waging war on women when they do a damn fine job of it themselves.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Karin on October 02, 2012, 09:27:25 AM
OT:  GOBUCKS, I find the large sig pics irritating.  I imagine those in rural areas with slower internet access find them tiresome as well.  Why not put them in the photo section?  We don't have to see them over and over again.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 02, 2012, 09:33:45 AM
It's an individual choice.  Why do you hate our freedoms?
Just call 'em like I see 'em.

I'm spending more and more time scrolling, for a diminishing ROI.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: USA4ME on October 02, 2012, 09:47:17 AM
It never occurs to libs that women who are opposed to abortion have legitimate reasons for holding that viewpoint.  It has nothing to do with political parties.

Poor Pedro.

.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: dixierose on October 02, 2012, 10:52:04 AM
Just call 'em like I see 'em.

I'm spending more and more time scrolling, for a diminishing ROI.

A couple of message boards I was a member of had an option to turn off signatures. Is that an option here?
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: chitownchica on October 02, 2012, 01:18:18 PM
I still can't remember the femanazi primitive who said that term, and brought it to light to me about 2 1/2 years ago, but my dad and I joked about the idiot femanazi for a few days after that. I believe her exact words were "walking ****holes."

A few months ago, Redqueen (or another radfem) used the term '****toilet'.  They are disgusting pigs.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 02, 2012, 03:29:36 PM
OT:  GOBUCKS, I find the large sig pics irritating.  I imagine those in rural areas with slower internet access find them tiresome as well.  Why not put them in the photo section?  We don't have to see them over and over again.

I'm in that boat myself, being on satellite as the only available allegedly-broadband provider, but the pics aren't that big a problem.  What annoys me is the posts that have one or two words telling me to watch some YouTube clip, or just a hyperlink to some farflung site, with no original commentary by the poster explaining what is good, bad, or worthwhile about it.  I'm sure the posters (Mostly) all have the best intentions, but that kind of stuff eats up my limited bandwidth like crazy and the videos that are over about a minute and a half could tell me how to turn iron to gold and they still wouldn't be worth the very long time it takes for them to fully load, so I think of it pretty much as spam.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 02, 2012, 03:33:20 PM
A couple of message boards I was a member of had an option to turn off signatures. Is that an option here?

Yes!! I just checked settings, and we do have that option.

All that silly wasted-space junk just disappeared!

Thank you. I haven't looked at the options in settings since I signed up.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Revolution on October 02, 2012, 03:34:13 PM
A few months ago, Redqueen (or another radfem) used the term '****toilet'.  They are disgusting pigs.

That's a new one on me. Homos would most likely get turned on by that term though...
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: chitownchica on October 02, 2012, 03:48:20 PM
That's a new one on me. Homos would most likely get turned on by that term though...

Ewwwwww :lmao:.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: dixierose on October 02, 2012, 04:25:04 PM
Yes!! I just checked settings, and we do have that option.

All that silly wasted-space junk just disappeared!

Thank you. I haven't looked at the options in settings since I signed up.

Glad I could help :-)
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: franksolich on October 02, 2012, 04:43:16 PM
Glad I could help :-)

Whoa.

You're right.

I've been here nearly five years, and I never knew the feature existed.

I probably saw it but didn't pay attention.

Thank you!
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: franksolich on October 02, 2012, 04:45:56 PM
What annoys me is the posts that have one or two words telling me to watch some YouTube clip, or just a hyperlink to some farflung site, with no original commentary by the poster explaining what is good, bad, or worthwhile about it.

Uh huh.

In the past--not recently, though--we've had a few now-former members whine that nobody ever responded to their posts.

It was obvious why.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: BadCat on October 02, 2012, 04:56:50 PM
Uh huh.

In the past--not recently, though--we've had a few now-former members whine that nobody ever responded to their posts.

It was obvious why.

Damn, frank...you mean nobody responds to my posts because of my sig line??

And here I was thinking it was because I'm just a mean son of a bitch.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: franksolich on October 02, 2012, 04:58:06 PM
Damn, frank...you mean nobody responds to my posts because of my sig line??

And here I was thinking it was because I'm just a mean son of a bitch.

Oh now, BadCat, your signature line's fine.

But if you think you dislike the primitives more than franksolich does, welcome to second place!
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: BadCat on October 02, 2012, 05:04:15 PM
Oh now, BadCat, your signature line's fine.

But if you think you dislike the primitives more than franksolich does, welcome to second place!

Let's just say the methodology you employ in expressing your dislike is much more elegant than mine.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Tess Anderson on October 02, 2012, 06:41:34 PM
I knew this one would already be here. Atman's artwork sucks as usual, another DUmmie had to correct him on the eye color and the word "uterus" has two u s in it.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 02, 2012, 06:59:36 PM
Glad I could help
This is so great - scrolling through the forum without even a speck of that silly sig line bullshit!

It's the best thing since putting vestanumbers on ignore.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Duke Nukum on October 02, 2012, 07:00:49 PM
Toast is a hate-filled scrotum of pus. And it shows in his "art" "work."
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: BlueStateSaint on October 03, 2012, 04:16:07 AM
Toast is a hate-filled scrotum of pus. And it shows in his "art" "work."

And he's overflowing with pus, too.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: franksolich on October 03, 2012, 08:08:41 AM
This is so great - scrolling through the forum without even a speck of that silly sig line bullshit!

Yeah, that simplified this particular life considerably too.

Quote
It's the best thing since putting vestanumbers on ignore.

Oh now.  You just never let vesta grow on you.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: wasp69 on October 03, 2012, 09:36:25 AM
Quote
Atman (24,717 posts)

I drew a new Mittens cartoon...


Congratulations, Atman, on reducing the worth of women to their genitals.  Bravo, sexist turd, bravo...
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Revolution on October 04, 2012, 12:36:39 AM
And he's overflowing with pus, too.

He's *****?
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Skul on October 04, 2012, 12:44:46 AM
I've never minded the sig lines that others use.
I often find them intertaining.
A good example is Revs, up above. (unless the stinkbug changes it in the next hour)
Don't mind them at all.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Revolution on October 04, 2012, 01:17:10 AM
I've never minded the sig lines that others use.
I often find them intertaining.
A good example is Revs, up above. (unless the stinkbug changes it in the next hour)
Don't mind them at all.

I don't plan on changing it at least until after the election. Maybe not after that.

And don't push me. I'm going to get a shower in a few minutes here, dammit.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Skul on October 04, 2012, 01:20:40 AM
I don't plan on changing it at least until after the election. Maybe not after that.

And don't push me. I'm going to get a shower in a few minutes here, dammit.
Take two.
Don't want to be bothered with showers tonight.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: Revolution on October 04, 2012, 01:23:05 AM
I usually take two a day, but not back to back. I'm not a fanatic! :panic:
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: BlueStateSaint on October 04, 2012, 04:20:44 AM
He's *****?

 :lmao: :rotf: :rofl:

H5!
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: jtyangel on October 04, 2012, 05:15:33 AM
Congratulations, Atman, on reducing the worth of women to their genitals.  Bravo, sexist turd, bravo...

Thank you very much. I've said before this whole war on women thing amounts to the same and sadly those in my own gender can't seem to understand what useful idiots they are being for a sexist meme. Pathetic!
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: MrsSmith on October 04, 2012, 05:56:43 AM
Thank you very much. I've said before this whole war on women thing amounts to the same and sadly those in my own gender can't seem to understand what useful idiots they are being for a sexist meme. Pathetic!
I can't get over that or the fact that so many of their positions are built upon transparent lies.   :mental:
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: franksolich on October 04, 2012, 06:10:48 AM
Congratulations, Atman, on reducing the worth of women to their genitals.  Bravo, sexist turd, bravo...

I've never been good at describing Freudian stuff to others--only that I myself appear to understand it pretty well--but anyway, in doing this, Atman is betraying yet more evidence that subconsciously, he's as odd as a three-dollar bill.

Of course he's married (or maybe not any more) and has sired children, but it's always been sort of obvious which gender he prefers, given the gender he holds in contempt.

It's kind of--not quite, but very similar--along the same lines as to why homosexual acts are so ubiquitous, so common, in the Arab world (not Moslem, but Arab).

Atman might as well come out of the closet, at the same time admitting he subconsciously prefers being the submissive one.

<<has known Atman for a very long time now.
Title: Re: Youterus
Post by: jtyangel on October 04, 2012, 06:16:11 AM
I can't get over that or the fact that so many of their positions are built upon transparent lies.   :mental:

Apparently, they aren't transparent to a lot of women. I've already asked friends of mine who believe this schtick what is wrong with asking them to prioritize a menial amount for birth control(for example) in the same way they prioritize their cell phone or a new pair of shoes. I hear a lot of stuttering, but no real explanation other then the obvious one: actual earned income is only for discretionary items not 'needs'. Everyone else should pay for 'needs'. Add that in with the whole "I'm a woman and not supposed to like Republicans' meme many women have been fed over the years and voila, there's your reason this gets bought--both out of willing necessity and the adherence to old lines of rhetoric.

I do think I've made some headway when I use the same argument wasp did above and ask why they are comfortable with the left reducing them to their genitalia. Asking if they are ok with a sexist line in order to advance a politician's campaign.