This poll was "commissioned by the Republican State Committee." http://articles.philly.com/2012-09-21/news/33978421_1_dead-heat-gop-poll-new-poll
The fact that Obama's PA lead in all polls not commissioned by the Republican Party is larger is merely a coincidence.
Can you tell me what the poll got wrong, please? Thanks.You mean other than the poll didn't claim that Ron Paul was expected to be a come from behind, dark horse winnah, and that his victory in Pennsylvania would so
Can you tell me what the poll got wrong, please? Thanks.
Can you tell me what the poll got wrong, please? Thanks.
The pollster assumes that 2012 will be like 2004, as if pollsters were supposed to make such assumptions.
http://sprblog.wordpress.com/2012/09/24/why-our-recent-polling-is-accurate-and-shows-a-close-election-for-president-by-james-lee-president-of-spr/
The pollster assumes that 2012 will be like 2004, as if pollsters were supposed to make such assumptions.
http://sprblog.wordpress.com/2012/09/24/why-our-recent-polling-is-accurate-and-shows-a-close-election-for-president-by-james-lee-president-of-spr/
What should the assumption, be, o genious of polling data? :whatever:
What should the assumption, be, o genious of polling data? :whatever:
None. No assumptions. Pollsters shouldn't assume things.
On a different note, do you guys think Rasmussen is crazy? His poll released Friday has Obama up by 12% in PA. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/pennsylvania/election_2012_pennsylvania_president