The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: 5412 on September 19, 2012, 09:51:35 AM

Title: Obama judge strikes again! Scary stuff!
Post by: 5412 on September 19, 2012, 09:51:35 AM
Hi,

Remember when the law was signed that basically said the government could pick up a suspected terrorist and hold them indefinitely without charges?  Obama reluctantly signed it of course promising not to abuse the priviledge.  Of course the law does not jive with the little principal "Innocent until proven guilty"; kinda like unconstitutional perhaps??

Just got the following from a friend.


First, yesterday, all seemed bright and gay, as Hedges "won" his suit:

http://www.readersupportednews.org/off-site-opinion-section/54-54/13516-focus-challenging-the-ndaa-we-won-for-now

Then today, here come de hammer:

http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-lohier-ndaa-stay-414/

And who is Lohier? None other than Obama's selection to replace Sonia
Sotomayor on the 2nd Circuit.

After reading the two articles, a though occured to me.  One alluded to the fact that perhaps the government was getting ready to swoop in and nail a lot of folks.  Hmmm, I wonder if speaking out on the Conservative Cave might get us on a list?  I wonder if the timing might just have been planned for after the election?

This is some scary stuff as far as I am concerned.

regards,
5412


Title: Re: Obama judge strikes again! Scary stuff!
Post by: JohnnyReb on September 19, 2012, 09:56:31 AM
Well, if they were to "swoop" in right now, they might get me. But if I see others being "Swooped" first....well, it might be a "swoop and poop and swoop up the poop" operation. :-)
Title: Re: Obama judge strikes again! Scary stuff!
Post by: CG6468 on September 19, 2012, 10:25:26 AM
Well, if they were to "swoop" in right now, they might get me. But if I see others being "Swooped" first....well, it might be a "swoop and poop and swoop up the poop" operation. :-)

Regardless of some of our individual differences with some other posters, we all must stick together here. There's a much bigger thing at stake than just disagreeing amongst ourselves. I'm not, however, saying that we have to accept trolls and other troublemakers.