The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Revolution on September 11, 2012, 12:31:51 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021316814
I debated not even posting this. Then again, I debated reaching through the screen, and BITCHSLAPPING every one of these treasonous tards. After realizing this wasn't possible, I decided to only bring the link over. I may bring a couple of the responses over when I calm down, but dammit, this is absolutely enraging. How these people think this way is beyond me. All of them need to have their brains donated for research when they die so that normal people may one day understand what makes them the way they are. SCUM BAGS!! :mad: :argh:
-
jillan (30,606 posts)
2. THIS bombshell just lost the election for Romney. This is worse then what they did to the economy..
They had US citizens willfully murdered.
The republican party is toast
**** off DUmmies.
-
I get really angry and unsettled this time of year because I lost several of my friends, including my very best friend since we were kids in 1976. He didn't die on 9/11, but he was killed in the war that followed in Afghanistan, we signed up together on the buddy program in '83. I hate the way that this has all been politicized and marginalized, fight it to win or GTFO!. The parasites at DU cannot even begin to understand what sacrifice means.
-
I get really angry and unsettled this time of year because I lost several of my friends, including my very best friend since we were kids in 1976. He didn't die on 9/11, but he was killed in the war that followed in Afghanistan, we signed up together on the buddy program in '83. I hate the way that this has all been politicized and marginalized, fight it to win or GTFO!. The parasites at DU cannot even begin to understand what sacrifice means.
To a DUmmie, "sacrifice" means having to buy one less bag of Cheetos this week because he donated to Barry's re-election. :censored:
These people are too stupid to remember to breathe.
-
The parasites at DU cannot even begin to understand what sacrifice means.
Yet they pnotificate on how useless the sacrifice of those who have served is.
Assclowns. :bird:
-
Oh, goody--the DUmp monkeys are howling and flinging shit over an OPINION piece from a newspaper which in their 9/11/01 edition, had this picture in it:
(http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/Ayerssucks.jpg)
-
I'll burn any issues I see. :censored:
-
Hey, Hey Jude,
You are not going to be around long if you keep pissing on their cheetoes like that.
Hey Jude (24 posts)
21. If Bush had not stolen the election
View profile
You can be assured that as early as May 2001, President Gore would have ordered that all Middle Eastern/Muslim men in the country be rounded up and detained for questioning and all aviation be grounded until bin Laden and Al Qaeda was searched out and destroyed.
This entire disaster could have been averted!
I assume this is sarcasm but sometimes it is difficult to tell with them.
-
I debated not even posting this. Then again, I debated reaching through the screen, and BITCHSLAPPING every one of these treasonous tards. After realizing this wasn't possible, I decided to only bring the link over. I may bring a couple of the responses over when I calm down, but dammit, this is absolutely enraging. How these people think this way is beyond me. All of them need to have their brains donated for research when they die so that normal people may one day understand what makes them the way they are. SCUM BAGS!! :mad: :argh:
Okay, Revolution, old pal, good friend of mine; very good friend of mine.
Calm down.
Today, as with holidays sacred to Christians and Jews, or commemorating the Great Sacrifices made by those who put themselves into dread peril so that we may live free, the primitives are going to do their best to show the world what they are.
Let them.
The blunt fact is, the least person who died on 9-11, or the soldiers who died in the wars following, did humanity a million times more good than all the primitives on Skins's island put together.
God compels us to be compassionate to assholes, but God at the same time reminds us--or at least reminds franksolich, if no one else--that compared with a primitive, a rectal aperture looks utterly unoffensive. And unlike the primitives, it at least serves a useful purpose.
The primitives can **** off, eat shit, and die.
-
AMEN! I'd rather stare at a wrinkly old, brown dounut all day than mosey on over to the DUmp on 9/11, and I'm done with them today. Absolutely done. If anyone else has the stomach to do it, by all means. Not me. As my old man use to say; These people wouldn't make a good pimple on a man's ass. 'Tis true.
I am going to let them pontificate, bloviate, and spew their general hatred (amped up by 100 times) today, but I refuse to be part of any more of it unless is it brought over by a decent, kind, caring, civilized human being.
As I said in the tread title....BASTARDS!
On Edit: What does the "fs" mean in my newly refurbished thread title, Frank?
-
On Edit: What does the "fs" mean in my newly refurbished thread title, Frank?
It's my initials, signifying to the other moderators that franksolich would like to keep this thread "stickied" up here until about this time tomorrow, Wednesday. Or it's my seal of approval. Or it's just a gimmick to attract readers. Who knows.
-
It's my initials, signifying to the other moderators that franksolich would like to keep this thread "stickied" up here until about this time tomorrow, Wednesday. Or it's my seal of approval. Or it's just a gimmick to attract readers. Who knows.
Should have thought about initials. :thatsright: Anyway, I'll go with the bold, and I thank you.
-
It's my initials, signifying to the other moderators that franksolich would like to keep this thread "stickied" up here until about this time tomorrow, Wednesday. Or it's my seal of approval. Or it's just a gimmick to attract readers. Who knows.
Or, it's "all of the above." :tongue:
-
I am confident that the Left would have fully supported a pre-emptive strike against UBL prior to 9/11. All Bush would have had to do was announce a strike had occured based on the Aug 8th PDB and the Left would have accept the frank and sober terms.
-
Sherman A1 (9,352 posts)
80. Agreed
And that the story is from the NYT it will be immediately discredited by the Republicans and those who will vote that way in November. Assuming the reporting and story is 110% accurate, it will make absolutely no difference to them.
Where does the stupid start and end here? Immediately discrediting something that you assume to be 100 nay, 110% correct?
Ummm..whaaaat?
krawhitham (2,428 posts)
64. Not funny
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/15_percent_of_ohio_gopers_credit_romney_with_bin_ladens_death/
62% are “not sure†whether Obama or Romney deserves more of the credit or flat out that Romney is “more responsible†for bin Laden’s death than Obama.
Now, THAT is hilarious. People with brains think Obinga had no more to do with it than Romney did, but.........
it's: Republicans believe Romney killed Bin Laden.
W. T. F. ?
-
Honeycombe8 (12,618 posts)
28. No. To the Republicans, this is ancient history. And they have never blamed Bush, & won't.nt
No. We don't. We put blame squarely where it should lay:
(http://acufenosblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/bill20clinton20vanity20fair.jpg)
Huh..yeah, I messed.....
-
No. We don't. We put blame squarely where it should lay:
(http://acufenosblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/bill20clinton20vanity20fair.jpg)
Huh..yeah, I messed.....
I think that the most telling thing about the Clenis' involvement was that he was telling anyone and everyone that he warned President Bush about OBL. Whether they asked him or not.
-
I think that the most telling thing about the Clenis' involvement was that he was telling anyone and everyone that he warned President Bush about OBL. Whether they asked him or not.
A sure sign.
-
This is nothing new. They howled that Bush didn't do enough prior to 9/11 then they howled even louder when he took measures to stop another attack.
-
Is Obama setting himself and us for another attack by blatantly ignoring national security?
The Government Accountability Institute examined President Obama’s schedule from the day he took office until mid-June 2012, to see how often he attended his Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) — the meeting at which he is briefed on the most critical intelligence threats to the country. During his first 1,225 days in office, Obama attended his PDB just 536 times — or 43.8 percent of the time.
During 2011 and the first half of 2012, his attendance became even less frequent — falling to just over 38 percent. By contrast, Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush almost never missed his daily intelligence meeting.
NRO (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/316422/obama-missing-daily-intelligence-meetings-regularly-katrina-trinko#)
-
I think that the most telling thing about the Clenis' involvement was that he was telling anyone and everyone that he warned President Bush about OBL. Whether they asked him or not.
The guilty dog barks.
-
No. We don't. We put blame squarely where it should lay:
(http://acufenosblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/bill20clinton20vanity20fair.jpg)
Huh..yeah, I messed.....
He has far more blood on his hands then what they claim Bush of ever having . I blame him for the deaths of not only the victims of 9/11 but of the 19 rangers during Somalia when he refused to give them the support they asked for.
-
This has been one of my most troubling trials and tribulations since I have been associated with the Army for my entire adulthood (30+ years). I have taken the oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies. I read this stuff and realize it's their free speech and too many of my buddies have given their life for. I know the DUmmies would just as soon as piss on Arlington and not give a damn on how their views are protected under our basic rights. I just don't know how people in the United States can be so f***ked up in the head to have this much hate and spite about the greatest country God ever created. :bird:
-
Sherman A1 (9,352 posts)
80. Agreed
And that the story is from the NYT it will be immediately discredited by the Republicans and those who will vote that way in November. Assuming the reporting and story is 110% accurate, it will make absolutely no difference to them.
Okay, shermy, I'll play your silly ass game and assume the story is 110% accurate. From what I read, the NYT is looking to dredge up bullshit on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 to splatter it against the GOP. Why do I say that? Very simply because the CIA was warning of the threat of an impending attack. Somewhere, somehow, bin laden and the gang was going to attack us.
Let me break that down for you, DUmbass, to the two most important words: Somewhere, somehow. What the author has failed to mention is the fact that the CIA had nothing better than somewhere and somehow. There was no definite intel on what was going to happen, where it was going to happen, and what method of delivery was being used - just somewhere, somehow. No leader is going to throw the entire country into chaos and lockdown over somewhere and somehow.
None; not even your precious algore.
What this walking cluster**** of journalism malpractice has that no one at the time did is history and hindsight. Funny how those two things will give even the most retarded among us the ability to connect a ton of dots that connect the somewhere, somehow. The kangaroo court of the 9/11 commission didn't find the first damn thing and neither has this ****ing idiot. So, calm yourself down and save your blood pressure for election night.
Yer gonna need it...
-
This has been one of my most troubling trials and tribulations since I have been associated with the Army for my entire adulthood (30+ years). I have taken the oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies. I read this stuff and realize it's their free speech and too many of my buddies have given their life for. I know the DUmmies would just as soon as piss on Arlington and not give a damn on how their views are protected under our basic rights. I just don't know how people in the United States can be so f***ked up in the head to have this much hate and spite about the greatest country God ever created. :bird:
^5
-
From that NY Times Link:
On Aug. 6, 2001, President George W. Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, Al Qaeda. That morning’s “presidential daily brief†— the top-secret document prepared by America’s intelligence agencies — featured the now-infamous heading: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.†A few weeks later, on 9/11, Al Qaeda accomplished that goal.
No mention of Monsoor Ijaz's assertion that Bill Clinton had a chance to get Bin Laden at least 4 times.
-
From the comments section at the NY Times:
Notably absent from the alleged memos that Eichenwald allegedly saw is any intelligence that said that terrorists planned to fly two airplanes into the World Trade Center and use others to attack Washington D.C.
So ... an "attack" was imminent, said the memos. OK, but what kind of attack? An attack on a Navy warship? An Army base? A football stadium? A baseball game? An airport? A train station? A government building? Los Angeles? New York? Washington DC? Seattle? Chicago? Philadelphia? Boston? Theses alleged briefs didn't tell us any of that. (If they did, I am sure Mr. Eichenwald would have told us.)
And while everyone seems to want to jump on President Bush on this, what did these briefs actually tell him to do? What were the recommendations for him? As far as what we've been told, there weren't any. What was Bush supposed to do, shut the country down until these non-specific "threats" went away?
Eichenwald's information is very interesting, but it fails to convince that Bush was at fault. Rather, the top levels of intelligence failed in grasping that a WTC/D.C. attack would happen with loaded airplanes on September 11.
-
Hi5 to Wasp
-
This is nothing new. They howled that Bush didn't do enough prior to 9/11 then they howled even louder when he took measures to stop another attack.
And some of them howled that 9/11 was an inside job masterminded by Bush.
-
So, the short of it is NYT has gone 'Troofer' - and the primitives thing that following suit is a winning strategery ?
Yeah, you do that, primitives.
-
I get really angry and unsettled this time of year because I lost several of my friends, including my very best friend since we were kids in 1976. He didn't die on 9/11, but he was killed in the war that followed in Afghanistan, we signed up together on the buddy program in '83. I hate the way that this has all been politicized and marginalized, fight it to win or GTFO!. The parasites at DU cannot even begin to understand what sacrifice means.
Very sorry to hear about the loss of your friend while he fought for our nation.
-
The parasites at DU cannot even begin to understand what sacrifice means.
The primitives don't understand sacrifice because they've never had to give up something themselves.
Instead, others have to sacrifice for them, so that the primitives can live in ease and comfort and idleness.
I think it's long past time we stopped giving them stuff; the more the primitives get, the more the primitives want, and they aren't grateful for it anyway.
-
The steps taken by the Bush administration (and Congress) post-9/11 to protect the U.S. from further attacks sent the Left into apoplectic fits, and this was after the fact of 3000 citizens dying on that day. If he had initiated even one-tenth of those policies based on nothing more substantial than "Bin Laden determined to attack the U.S." in an intel briefing, can you imagine how hysterical they would have become?
On top of that, every day after 9/11 that intel on further possible terrorist threats were made public they ridiculed the idea and mocked it with snark about "Terra! Terra! Terra! Fear! Fear! Fear!" and downplayed it all. Even their pig-god that they worship, Michael Moore, infamously claimed, "There is no terrorist threat!", and they clamored for our intelligence networks to be dismantled.
That is enough for any thinking human being to dismiss out of hand any and all opinions these fartsuckers have on the matter.
-
The steps taken by the Bush administration (and Congress) post-9/11 to protect the U.S. from further attacks sent the Left into apoplectic fits, and this was after the fact of 3000 citizens dying on that day. If he had initiated even one-tenth of those policies based on nothing more substantial than "Bin Laden determined to attack the U.S." in an intel briefing, can you imagine how hysterical they would have become?
On top of that, every day after 9/11 that intel on further possible terrorist threats were made public they ridiculed the idea and mocked it with snark about "Terra! Terra! Terra! Fear! Fear! Fear!" and downplayed it all. Even their pig-god that they worship, Michael Moore, infamously claimed, "There is no terrorist threat!", and they clamored for our intelligence networks to be dismantled.
That is enough for any thinking human being to dismiss out of hand any and all opinions these fartsuckers have on the matter.
+1 :hi5:
-
Barack Obama is still running his foreign policy under Bush guidelines because he has no idea what else to do. He's still carrying out drone strikes, phone surveillance, and incarceration at Guantanamo Bay.
The DUmmies' Golden Boy is worse than useless. He can only mimick the man that came before him... he has nothing original or intelligent to offer.
-
The steps taken by the Bush administration (and Congress) post-9/11 to protect the U.S. from further attacks sent the Left into apoplectic fits, and this was after the fact of 3000 citizens dying on that day. If he had initiated even one-tenth of those policies based on nothing more substantial than "Bin Laden determined to attack the U.S." in an intel briefing, can you imagine how hysterical they would have become?
No kidding. Even after young muslim men carried out the 9/11 attacks we still can't profile young muslim men at the airports. WTF do the DUmmies suggest Bush could/ should have done with the sketchy intel that would have prevented the 9/11 attacks?